Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

HuskyFan Podcast: Post Arizona, Pre Utah

HeretoBeatmyChest
HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
in Hardcore Husky Board
http://traffic.libsyn.com/huskyfanpodcast/Nov22015PostArizonaPreUtah.mp3

More of a subdued cast in the first half but we power through it.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,067 Founders Club
    Did I get called senile?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Can we pin this shit?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,463
    edited November 2015
    You guys get a load of pills in your trick or treat bag? If so can I PM you my address and you send me a few?

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,463
    edited November 2015
    I'm about half way through and you can tell the quaaludes are starting to wear off. Then you guys break into a greatest hits of husky blowout losses. I'm going to the bathroom and slitting my wrists.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,484 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Can we pin this shit?

    I always pin it the moment I first see it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    BlowItUp said:

    we should start a pool to guess the time jimmy starts bitching about going to bed

    When we begin to repeat ourselves repeatedly and start pining about yester dreck its time for bed.

    65 or 75 minutes is plenty of time spent on petey and Rich Rod
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    Swaye said:

    Can we pin this shit?

    I always pin it the moment I first see it
    I was just being an asshole. It's what I do best.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • droggins
    droggins Member Posts: 804
    Show was a dud. The QB should have stayed in bed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    You know you guys can totally do like 30 minutes if there isn't any material. Also what the fuck was going on when chest asked roaddog a question and then completely spazzed out when he answered?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    Thanks to the 3 of you again for doing this. A suggestion.....

    I don't think I'm asking a lot, but is there any chance we can get everyone on the podcast, with the primary topic about the previous game, to have actually watched the previous game? @Jesus_H_Christ, commenting on a game you didn't watch......
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited November 2015
    I'm worried this Saturday is going to be similar to this weeks podcast.

    Following up your best podcast game ever you guys really struggled on this one and came out flat. It's hard when you all chug a bottle of nightquill and take a lude or two. I know it's hard, just really hard in this Pat hill TUFF podcast conference. You guys were able to rally a bit in the 4th quarter when little jimmy ( @jecornel ) and @HeretoBeatmyChest started trolling each other over the predictions but it only made the score look closer than it really was on the field. If the podcast this week was an NFL team (lol...wtf??) you guys would have been the 49ers.

    I would still like to see @HeretoBeatmyChest answer the questions he pressed @jecornel and @RoadDawg55 to answer which were:

    Will Petersen win the pac12 while he is here?
    Will Petersen win the national championship while he is here?
    How many wins this year (including bowl game) to say season is a success?
    How many wins next year (including bowl game) to say season was success?

    Bonus question:
    What srs does Petersen need to finish, this year and next for Pete to keep your confidence?

    But seriously, considering this was the worst pood you guys have done and I was still entertained enough, thanks. My advanced metrics says your podcast is top 2 in podcasts on the hardcore husky radio network.

    Blah blah blah, I'm a dick and lucky you guys do the podcast at all.


    But seriously, thanks guys
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,659 Standard Supporter
    Get Jimmy some coffee!

    You guys sounded down considering 49-3.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Get Jimmy some coffee!

    You guys sounded down considering 49-3.

    Road DGAF anymore.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    HuskyInAZ said:

    Thanks to the 3 of you again for doing this. A suggestion.....

    I don't think I'm asking a lot, but is there any chance we can get everyone on the podcast, with the primary topic about the previous game, to have actually watched the previous game? @Jesus_H_Christ, commenting on a game you didn't watch......

    You're lucky we podcast at all :). The last two games have been the first games I haven't watched live since Hawaii 2011. One of us not watching a game isn't going to become the norm.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,216
    Started off entertaining with Little Jimmy getting butthurt about being Little Jimmy. Went downhill from there.

    Chest freaking out about the "small victory" response to not losing by 20 was amusing. What a fucking whoosh.

    "UW 49-3 over Arizona wasn't a small victory!!"

    Hahaha

    Regarding the game at LSU, I saw a LSU fan on reddit say that was the biggest mismatch against a P5 school he had ever seen at a Tiger homegame. Sark should have been fired after that game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Started off entertaining with Little Jimmy getting butthurt about being Little Jimmy. Went downhill from there.
    Chest freaking out about the "small victory" response to not losing by 20 was amusing. What a fucking whoosh.

    "UW 49-3 over Arizona wasn't a small victory!!"

    Hahaha

    Regarding the game at LSU, I saw a LSU fan on reddit say that was the biggest mismatch against a P5 school he had ever seen at a Tiger homegame. Sark should have been fired after that game.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    Thanks to the 3 of you again for doing this. A suggestion.....

    I don't think I'm asking a lot, but is there any chance we can get everyone on the podcast, with the primary topic about the previous game, to have actually watched the previous game? @Jesus_H_Christ, commenting on a game you didn't watch......

    You're lucky we podcast at all :). The last two games have been the first games I haven't watched live since Hawaii 2011. One of us not watching a game isn't going to become the norm.
    You are right. We all are lucky you all give up your time to do the podcast. It really is entertaining.

    But I can't imagine commenting on a game I have not watched. If it were me, I'd simply say I didn't watch the game, so I can't comment one way or the other.

    I don't mean to diminish the time you put into the podcast. Again, it is entertaining, and it's very much appreciated. I look forward to listening every week.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section_332
    section_332 Member Posts: 2,403
    The endings to these are so funny. THATS when the sexual tension comes out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Surprised no one mentioned JC recruiting for plugging talent holes at WR. I agree we need a gamechanger and don't have one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    UW rarely goes the JC route....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    Lots of free pub ... some of @jecornel's finest moments of this pod
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    jecornel said:

    UW rarely goes the JC route....

    Took 2 guys in the last year. Turner and that QB who will never play.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    jecornel said:

    UW rarely goes the JC route....

    Took 2 guys in the last year. Turner and that QB who will never play.
    So you are saying it's common?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • priapism
    priapism Member Posts: 2,305
    Gladstone said:

    Surprised no one mentioned JC recruiting for plugging talent holes at WR. I agree we need a gamechanger and don't have one.

    A strong fellow?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    jecornel said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    jecornel said:

    UW rarely goes the JC route....

    Took 2 guys in the last year. Turner and that QB who will never play.
    So you are saying it's common?
    No, only pointing out that while it is rare, they still may take a JC guy or two in each class.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Is there a Wr in the JC ranks worth pursuing?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Houhusky said:

    I'm worried this Saturday is going to be similar to this weeks podcast.

    Following up your best podcast game ever you guys really struggled on this one and came out flat. It's hard when you all chug a bottle of nightquill and take a lude or two. I know it's hard, just really hard in this Pat hill TUFF podcast conference. You guys were able to rally a bit in the 4th quarter when little jimmy ( @jecornel ) and @HeretoBeatmyChest started trolling each other over the predictions but it only made the score look closer than it really was on the field. If the podcast this week was an NFL team (lol...wtf??) you guys would have been the 49ers.

    I would still like to see @HeretoBeatmyChest answer the questions he pressed @jecornel and @RoadDawg55 to answer which were:

    Will Petersen win the pac12 while he is here?
    Will Petersen win the national championship while he is here?
    How many wins this year (including bowl game) to say season is a success?
    How many wins next year (including bowl game) to say season was success?

    Bonus question:
    What srs does Petersen need to finish, this year and next for Pete to keep your confidence?

    But seriously, considering this was the worst pood you guys have done and I was still entertained enough, thanks. My advanced metrics says your podcast is top 2 in podcasts on the hardcore husky radio network.

    Blah blah blah, I'm a dick and lucky you guys do the podcast at all.


    But seriously, thanks guys

    Yes, he will win the pac12 while he is here. Win a NC? Tough to say. I think he will compete for one and make the playoff at least a few times. I expect he will be the coach for up to 15 years so making a few playoffs is quite a reasonable expectation. I think 7 wins and the season is a success. Thing about bowl games is the better your season, the tougher your bowl game. Coming into the year, I was hoping for a top 50 SRS finish and 6-6 because of the deep rebuilding that had to be done. A top 40 finish is deserving of an "A" grade for the year.

    When top programs have their absolute worst seasons they tend to be close to 40. When they are successful in a rebuilding year, they can be around 20-30. USC was 6-6 in Carroll's first year but #26. Oklahoma the year before Stoops was #48, then Stoops in his first year went 7-5 but was #19. Ohio State the year before Tressell won the NC was #26. These 3 programs the year before they won NC (I guess 2 years in USC's case but the next year they finished #1 in SRS) were #19, #26 and #26. So if Petersen can finish in the top 40, in a deep rebuilding year, that is damn good.

    As far as next year I think 9+ wins. Next season I think winning the north is a reasonable expectation. I would be fairly disappointed if we don't win the north. Doesn't mean I will conclude Pete is not the guy.

    He inherited the #37 program at Boise in the previous 7 seasons. Over his 8 years there it was the #11 program. The 5 years before Pete was HC Boise averaged #32. Pete's first 5 years? He averaged #5. For context, UW was #42 under Sark. Pete has done well in a deep rebuilding year. He's recruiting fairly well. After a few 9-10 win seasons I suspect recruiting will go from 3.2-3.3 to 3.3-3.4 as it did for Oregon and Stanford. Then we'll be in position to compete nationally.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter