Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Petersen's post game comments...

PurpleBaze
PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,309 Founders Club
I don't give a shit about his presser, but this is probably how it's going to go.

"Stanford is the best team in the conference, no question and Palo Alto is a tough place to play, no question. No excuses on how we played. We just need to execute better. No question that McCaffrey is an amazing player, but we should have maybe keyed on him a little more. But then, you open yourself up to Hogan getting yards with his passing and running. Maybe we should have handed off the ball to Gaskin a few more times, but we felt that we had a good game plan on offense. We just have to execute the plays better. You have to realize that it's really hard to win a game with your starting quarterback being out. KJ just didn't get enough reps during the week to prepare for one of the best teams in the country."

Fuck! I'm sick of excuses, especially since the coaches' fucktardedness is painfully obvious.
«1

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Not enough "it's really hard."
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,600 Standard Supporter
    Yeah I don't really give a shit. Sark's excuse clichés were amusing to a degree. I just want to fucking win and have some pride in this program. It does feel like it will never happen sometimes.
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter

    Unless Petersen kicks things off with, "Jonathan Smith is no longer the offensive coordinator" I don't want to hear any of it.

    Better yet: "I have decided to step down as the head coach of the Washington Huskies football team. I just dismissed Jonathan Smith as the offensive coordinator. It's painfully obvious to me that I'm in over my head. I appreciate the opportunity that was given to me almost two years ago. But, as an honorable man, and for the good of the long-term success of this program, I must step down. That's all I have to say."

    He gets up and leaves the presser.
    That would be amazing.

    Hell, at this point I'd even settle if his pressers didn't include the words "youth", "hard", "difficult", or anything that praises the opposing coaching staff or players.
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,309 Founders Club

    Unless Petersen kicks things off with, "Jonathan Smith is no longer the offensive coordinator" I don't want to hear any of it.

    Better yet: "I have decided to step down as the head coach of the Washington Huskies football team. I just dismissed Jonathan Smith as the offensive coordinator. It's painfully obvious to me that I'm in over my head. I appreciate the opportunity that was given to me almost two years ago. But, as an honorable man, and for the good of the long-term success of this program, I must step down. That's all I have to say."

    He gets up and leaves the presser.
    That would be amazing.

    Hell, at this point I'd even settle if his pressers didn't include the words "youth", "hard", "difficult", or anything that praises the opposing coaching staff or players.
    No shit! I just want this grown-ass man to take responsibility as head coach. But then again, he knows his audience is a bunch of doogs and they'll buy all that shit.

    Actually, @Haid_D_Salaami just put up a scathing post on Facebook about Petersen. Of course, one of his doog friends jumps in there and talks about how this team lost a bunch of players to the NFL, etc.

    Typical fucking doog... "I feel some of your frustration. But I'm not going to give up on Peterson just yet. We lost some quality players to the NFL after last season. Including underclassmen. And honestly, I look at the success the Cougs are having this season and all they have gone through. Peterson's going to turn this program around. I love my Dawgs and will continue to follow and support them. And yeah, we kick ass when it comes to Crew!!!"
  • Dawgtona
    Dawgtona Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 707 Founders Club

    He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.

    Shit! De Soto should have come to Washington. Who knew the fountain of youth was in Montlake
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,600 Standard Supporter

    He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.

    that sounds way too much like ty....or maybe gilblob
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.

    CCP vs. Shaw

    4th and 3 vs. 4th and 14 inches.

    Ready. Go.




  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652

    He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.

    Has this team, and coaching staff - allegedly - reached the training wheels stage? This is exasperating.
  • Hippopeteamus
    Hippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958

    I don't give a shit about his presser, but this is probably how it's going to go.

    "Stanford is the best team in the conference, no question and Palo Alto is a tough place to play, no question. No excuses on how we played. We just need to execute better. No question that McCaffrey is an amazing player, but we should have maybe keyed on him a little more. But then, you open yourself up to Hogan getting yards with his passing and running. Maybe we should have handed off the ball to Gaskin a few more times, but we felt that we had a good game plan on offense. We just have to execute the plays better. You have to realize that it's really hard to win a game with your starting quarterback being out. KJ just didn't get enough reps during the week to prepare for one of the best teams in the country."

    Fuck! I'm sick of excuses, especially since the coaches' fucktardedness is painfully obvious.

    Will he say the same thing when we lose to Utah, WSU, and OSU? They call can't be the best teams in the conference.
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    edited October 2015
    Utah best in the South. WSU wannabe best in the North. OSU who gives shit, except if we lose?
  • DugtheDoog
    DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180

    Unless Petersen kicks things off with, "Jonathan Smith is no longer the offensive coordinator" I don't want to hear any of it.

    Better yet: "I have decided to step down as the head coach of the Washington Huskies football team. I just dismissed Jonathan Smith as the offensive coordinator. It's painfully obvious to me that I'm in over my head. I appreciate the opportunity that was given to me almost two years ago. But, as an honorable man, and for the good of the long-term success of this program, I must step down. That's all I have to say."

    He gets up and leaves the presser.
    But...but...who would you hire that's better? Huh? I'd like to see you be AD
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,309 Founders Club

    Race and Fremont and whoever else might be right. I'm just not going to invest a lot of time worrying about this stupid fucking team like I used to from Sunday through Friday. He's getting a few years unless he's caught with a little kid or strippers, and neither one of those scenarios is likely. I've already let this one go for the most part. Most (Some?) were wise enough to see through the 4-1 start in '06, 5-1 in 2011 after that loss to N, and 4-0 in 2013. Pick whatever third tier program you want - Kal, Arizona, Minnesota, Oregon State - that's us. Our peak is about 9-3 and a Sun Bowel. El Paso is special. We might be ranked 16th someday!!!!

    You mention strippers like it's a bad thing. I think most of us, especially @Swaye, would have a lot more respect for Peterman if he was taint lickin' a bunch of strippers.
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    Swaye said:

    TheGlove said:

    I hate you fucking fucks

  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,627 Founders Club
    What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.

    Sounds like you need perspective. LEAVE!
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.

    Although I agree with your premise, you are cherry picking numbers to fit your narrative. We had a pretty good run from '89-'92. Coaches poll finishes at 20, 5, 1, 10. And yes, I'm cherry picking numbers to fit the contrary narrative.

    At the end of the day, though, the entitled, impetulant crowd has a clouded their view of our place in college football. I love their passion, but their expectations, especially this year, are misguided.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    HuskyInAZ said:

    What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.

    Although I agree with your premise, you are cherry picking numbers to fit your narrative. We had a pretty good run from '89-'92. Coaches poll finishes at 20, 5, 1, 10. And yes, I'm cherry picking numbers to fit the contrary narrative.

    At the end of the day, though, the entitled, impetulant crowd has a clouded their view of our place in college football. I love their passion, but their expectations, especially from 2004 - 2015, are misguided.
    lather rinse repeat

    doogs gotta doog

    die in a fire

    LEAVE
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    He blamed the loss on youth and Stanford being a heck of a football team. It did not feel like he has the bar set high for his football team.

    Noone outside a handful of Doogs here and what's left of the posters on Dawgtran did either.
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,627 Founders Club

    HuskyInAZ said:

    What program have you all been watching, well, forever. This has never been the national program you all crave for. The closest we have ever been for more than three years would be from '77 - '84. '65-'76 was average to bad. '85-'89, very 8-4. '93-'99, average at best. If Peterman was able to deliver a top twenty program every year with a team that could compete for the P-12 every 3-4 I would love my family and myself again.

    Although I agree with your premise, you are cherry picking numbers to fit your narrative. We had a pretty good run from '89-'92. Coaches poll finishes at 20, 5, 1, 10. And yes, I'm cherry picking numbers to fit the contrary narrative.

    At the end of the day, though, the entitled, impetulant crowd has a clouded their view of our place in college football. I love their passion, but their expectations, especially from 2004 - 2015, are misguided.
    lather rinse repeat

    doogs gotta doog

    die in a fire

    LEAVE