#FirePetersen
Comments
-
Do a quick google search ... you'll find your proofFremontTroll said:
We were never predicted to win 4 games this year.Tequilla said:I tend to be of the opinion that the fuckers in Vegas know what the fuck they are doing ...
They had UW pegged for 9 wins last year ... we had 8 and pissed away the Arizona game. Bottom line business says Petersen was -1 last year versus unbiased expectations.
They had UW pegged for 4 wins this year ... we already have 3. It's looking like Petersen will exceed expectations this year.
Now, if you want to be pissed off because Petersen isn't getting MORE out of the team, then go for it. But to act like he's run the program into the ground as a disaster ... then I suggest you go back to the days of having coaches like Gilby and Tyrone running the program. That's what a disaster looks like.
HTH. -
That was the only excuse left in the playbook needed for a DOOG BINGO!!Tequilla said:For those wanting to fire Pete, I'd recommend directing your ire to firing Pool Boy as not only do you have more ammo, but you wouldn't want Pool Boy making the next hire anyway.
Of course, for as bad as Pool Boy is, also important to at least consider that the next hire could be worse than Pool Boy (not trying to prop him up here ... just stating that that's a possible) ... and given new President ... not convinced that you wouldn't end up with the next generation version of Turner. -
Vegas set a line on the number of awful gambling analogies you're going to make this weekend:Tequilla said:
Do a quick google search ... you'll find your proofFremontTroll said:
We were never predicted to win 4 games this year.Tequilla said:I tend to be of the opinion that the fuckers in Vegas know what the fuck they are doing ...
They had UW pegged for 9 wins last year ... we had 8 and pissed away the Arizona game. Bottom line business says Petersen was -1 last year versus unbiased expectations.
They had UW pegged for 4 wins this year ... we already have 3. It's looking like Petersen will exceed expectations this year.
Now, if you want to be pissed off because Petersen isn't getting MORE out of the team, then go for it. But to act like he's run the program into the ground as a disaster ... then I suggest you go back to the days of having coaches like Gilby and Tyrone running the program. That's what a disaster looks like.
HTH.
o2 -250/u2 +200
Does that mean the bookies are predicting you to only make two dumb fucking gambling posts this weekend? -
Sark was always just a few plays away from being more than he was too.Tequilla said:Following the 4 win mark set by Vegas this year and echoed in seemingly every single preseason prediction that I saw, the expectation was that the talent on this team was somewhere between shitty and overly young. You don't get predictions of 4 wins without some sizable holes on the roster.
What those that are whining and crying right now about every single loss is doing is looking at the fact that the 3 losses that we've had have been by a grand total of 15 points and looking at that as an indication of how close we are to being 6-0 ... which if we were would absolutely earn Petersen pole position into the Coach of the Year race. Probably also true if he was 5-1.
But for those carrying the pitchforks, the difference between leading the Coach of the Year race and being a disaster is razor thin.
I could swear that I heard on a certain podcast before the season that the prediction was that if Petersen was the coach that we thought he was that there's no way that he'd have a losing record this year even though the path to 6 or 7 wins didn't look great and was going to require some stretch. He's on the path to do that and the goal posts are being moved.
In the unlikely event that UW beats Stanford this weekend, those that have been the loudest this week won't point to the great job by the team or the coaching staff in beating Stanford. Instead, they'll point to some combination of how they blew games earlier in the season to Boise, Cal, and Oregon or how Shaw/Stanford aren't as good as people think (see loss to Northwestern).
Shoulda, coulda, woulda...the calling card of a fucking loser.
Write as many essays as you want, but these are the same old excuses. -
Where do you get the "Best Defense in the PAC 12"? Maybe you should wait until the season is over before claiming that title.RoadDawg55 said:Freeme, I'm right there with you. We all know Petersen won't get fired. He's an upper campuses wet dream off the field, so we are stuck with him unless he has multiple losing seasons. It's pretty tough to be that shitty in this day and age with the schedules. If he is eventually an 8 win coach (I think that's much more likely than a championship one) he will stay as long as he wants.
He fucking sucks though and we can talk about youth all we want, but fucktarded coaching has cost us multiple games over the past two seasons. We lost to two mediocre teams at home just this season. Unacceptable. The fact that we have the best defense in the Pac 12 and Petersen's expertise is on the offensive side of the ball makes it even worse. -
Tequilla deserves a good ol fashioned 41-0 plunger this weekend
-
He was for Sark until the Arizona St gameRoadDawg55 said:
If that is your opinion, what did you ever have against Sark?Tequilla said:I tend to be of the opinion that the fuckers in Vegas know what the fuck they are doing ...
They had UW pegged for 9 wins last year ... we had 8 and pissed away the Arizona game. Bottom line business says Petersen was -1 last year versus unbiased expectations.
They had UW pegged for 4 wins this year ... we already have 3. It's looking like Petersen will exceed expectations this year.
Now, if you want to be pissed off because Petersen isn't getting MORE out of the team, then go for it. But to act like he's run the program into the ground as a disaster ... then I suggest you go back to the days of having coaches like Gilby and Tyrone running the program. That's what a disaster looks like. -
You called Tequilla? Let me tell you about failed expectations. I know about failed expectations.Tequilla said:I tend to be of the opinion that the fuckers in Vegas know what the fuck they are doing ...
They had UW pegged for 9 wins last year ... we had 8 and pissed away the Arizona game. Bottom line business says Petersen was -1 last year versus unbiased expectations.
They had UW pegged for 4 wins this year ... we already have 3. It's looking like Petersen will exceed expectations this year.
and Tyrone running the program. That's what a disaster looks like.
---Numero uno (i'm fluent in your tortilla speak)
You said yourself that Petersen underperformed last year. -1. So he did worse than expected.
---Adios Seniors
We are losing Littleton, Feeney, Clay and Tupou on defense which are all major contributors. We may take a step back this year, and while the defense looks good now..it could be the last bit of talent before we step into an unknown world.
---TacoBell#3 Combo
In 2013 we were #3 in the Pac 12 in recruiting. We're now in the 6-8 range. I don't care about his bs OKG motto or whatever. Bottom line is Petersen won 8 games with Sarks drunk recruiting...if he fails to recruit better than Sark we are hosed. Because if he can't win with top quarter Pac-12 classes for upper classmen. He isn't going to win with middle of the pack classes either. This isn't boise. This is a Power 5.
So what's he's show me is...
- He will perform below unbias expectations.
- We are graduating some of our biggest contributors to Kawasaki's defense this year.
- He's recruiting lower than what we had when he showed up.
That all leads me to believe he's going to make us worse than what Sark did. -
Awful analysis.TyronesGhost said:
You called Tequilla? Let me tell you about failed expectations. I know about failed expectations.Tequilla said:I tend to be of the opinion that the fuckers in Vegas know what the fuck they are doing ...
They had UW pegged for 9 wins last year ... we had 8 and pissed away the Arizona game. Bottom line business says Petersen was -1 last year versus unbiased expectations.
They had UW pegged for 4 wins this year ... we already have 3. It's looking like Petersen will exceed expectations this year.
and Tyrone running the program. That's what a disaster looks like.
---Numero uno (i'm fluent in your tortilla speak)
You said yourself that Petersen underperformed last year. -1. So he did worse than expected.
---Adios Seniors
We are losing Littleton, Feeney, Clay and Tupou on defense which are all major contributors. We may take a step back this year, and while the defense looks good now..it could be the last bit of talent before we step into an unknown world.
---TacoBell#3 Combo
In 2013 we were #3 in the Pac 12 in recruiting. We're now in the 6-8 range. I don't care about his bs OKG motto or whatever. Bottom line is Petersen won 8 games with Sarks drunk recruiting...if he fails to recruit better than Sark we are hosed. Because if he can't win with top quarter Pac-12 classes for upper classmen. He isn't going to win with middle of the pack classes either. This isn't boise. This is a Power 5.
So what's he's show me is...
- He will perform below unbias expectations.
- We are graduating some of our biggest contributors to Kawasaki's defense this year.
- He's recruiting lower than what we had when he showed up.
That all leads me to believe he's going to make us worse than what Sark did.
Littleton and Feeney are the big losses. Tupou and Clay are just guys who are easily replaceable. Its nice that they are contributing but nobody expected them to theyve just been coached up.
We lost far more talemt last year and the defense got better. DE/BUCK/OLB is where we have the most CP recruits in the pipeline so somebody will step up.
You're going to the Sark was a great recruiter well? Why because everybody says so? One of the primary reasons we didn't have depth last year and we are so young this year is because the 2012 class was a total bust filled with Sark washouts. It's already abundantly clear that CP will have a higher hit rate with the 2 and 3* guys.
There are many areas of concern but recruiting and the defense are not among them. -
Basically my exact thoughts as well. For me all my concerns are on offense, which is not good at all.FremontTroll said:
Awful analysis.TyronesGhost said:
You called Tequilla? Let me tell you about failed expectations. I know about failed expectations.Tequilla said:I tend to be of the opinion that the fuckers in Vegas know what the fuck they are doing ...
They had UW pegged for 9 wins last year ... we had 8 and pissed away the Arizona game. Bottom line business says Petersen was -1 last year versus unbiased expectations.
They had UW pegged for 4 wins this year ... we already have 3. It's looking like Petersen will exceed expectations this year.
and Tyrone running the program. That's what a disaster looks like.
---Numero uno (i'm fluent in your tortilla speak)
You said yourself that Petersen underperformed last year. -1. So he did worse than expected.
---Adios Seniors
We are losing Littleton, Feeney, Clay and Tupou on defense which are all major contributors. We may take a step back this year, and while the defense looks good now..it could be the last bit of talent before we step into an unknown world.
---TacoBell#3 Combo
In 2013 we were #3 in the Pac 12 in recruiting. We're now in the 6-8 range. I don't care about his bs OKG motto or whatever. Bottom line is Petersen won 8 games with Sarks drunk recruiting...if he fails to recruit better than Sark we are hosed. Because if he can't win with top quarter Pac-12 classes for upper classmen. He isn't going to win with middle of the pack classes either. This isn't boise. This is a Power 5.
So what's he's show me is...
- He will perform below unbias expectations.
- We are graduating some of our biggest contributors to Kawasaki's defense this year.
- He's recruiting lower than what we had when he showed up.
That all leads me to believe he's going to make us worse than what Sark did.
Littleton and Feeney are the big losses. Tupou and Clay are just guys who are easily replaceable. Its nice that they are contributing but nobody expected them to theyve just been coached up.
We lost far more talemt last year and the defense got better. DE/BUCK/OLB is where we have the most CP recruits in the pipeline so somebody will step up.
You're going to the Sark was a great recruiter well? Why because everybody says so? One of the primary reasons we didn't have depth last year and we are so young this year is because the 2012 class was a total bust filled with Sark washouts. It's already abundantly clear that CP will have a higher hit rate with the 2 and 3* guys.
There are many areas of concern but recruiting and the defense are not among them.
The defense is sound and being well coached, it is sustainable as evidenced by getting better after losing the top end talent they lost last year. Plus, the recruiting on defense is going very well.
The offense and everything about it is my main and (quite, honestly) only major concern right now. Recruiting does matter, but evaluation and development are what truly matter. Sark "recruited" well by stars, but his evaluation, especially on offense was pure shit. Couple that with losing 50% of a class within 2 years of entering school and you are fucked.
