MyGaskin
Keith B. will still have Washington and will add speed-merchant McGrew in 2016. Would like to get a thumper for the 2017 class since DW will gone and Coleman will be a RS-SR.
seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/freshman-running-back-myles-gaskin-getting-comfortable-with-expanded-role-in-huskies-offense/
Comments
-
Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
-
I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
-
Da-fuq?!?! Peterman will run the freaking ball!
.
.
.
.
.
at least once every 3 drives, of maybe 2 drives if our RB goes for 70+ on a run.Dardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
-
"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
-
FUCK!RoadDawg55 said:"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
-
Why do you hate Johnie Kirton?RoadDawg55 said:I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
-
This is where Peterman probably misses an AD who gets it.
If UW had an AD who:
A) Was straight
Cared about winning
C) Understood football
He would be pushing Peterman ... not accepting his bullshit.
It's like when I go into a conversation with an IT director. The fucker will talk me in circles, unless I go in with some asshole who speaks that geek shit. Then the IT director knows he is fucked and has to do what I am wanting.
-
Yeah, but where are you going to find a straight guy who cares about winning and knows football these days?
-
-
I actually agree with him in general. Assuming you have a competent passing game, it might be best to attack certain defenses with the pass more than the run.RoadDawg55 said:"Running the ball isn't always the best way to attack a defense. It's really hard to run the ball. Maybe we could have been a little more stubborn in the run game. We still are figuring things out, but once these guys are seniors, they will have the necessary experience to best attack a defense."
But we don't have a competent passing game. So it ends up being ridiculous.
It is one thing to realize Oregon has weaknesses in the secondary. That is what a good coach would do. But to create an entire gameplan around your non-existant passing game is asinine. And then defending it after you have seen the results of your idiocy is even worse.
-
POTYDardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
-
Bubble screens, slow offense, and shitty clock management are the hallmarks of a winner.Dardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
What's this "running game" you speak of??? -
It's the thing you're supposed to use when you have 4th and 1 at your opponent's 39 yard line.ThomasFremont said:
Bubble screens, slow offense, and shitty clock management are the hallmarks of a winner.Dardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
What's this "running game" you speak of??? -
If you can't see the 4th and 1 QB punt is the wave of the future I can't help you.Dardanus said:
It's the thing you're supposed to use when you have 4th and 1 at your opponent's 39 yard line.ThomasFremont said:
Bubble screens, slow offense, and shitty clock management are the hallmarks of a winner.Dardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
What's this "running game" you speak of???
Peterman is just ahead of his tim. -
Have you ever coached D-1 football??? Didn't think so.Dardanus said:
It's the thing you're supposed to use when you have 4th and 1 at your opponent's 39 yard line.ThomasFremont said:
Bubble screens, slow offense, and shitty clock management are the hallmarks of a winner.Dardanus said:Yes, that would be great. Then we could watch Peterman continue to not run the ball with even better RBs.
What's this "running game" you speak of???
How dare you question the strategy of the Boise Jr College guru! -
I know it's confirmation bias, but I only remember the times Petersen has been wrong. I can think of quite a few scenarios. When has he been right in a coaching situation?
-
at UW? I don't know.RoadDawg55 said:I know it's confirmation bias, but I only remember the times Petersen has been wrong. I can think of quite a few scenarios. When has he been right in a coaching situation?
At Boise? Uh, hello...have you forgotten about this?
-
And this...
-
Going to the obvious Marvin Hall double pass from the 35 after Sark said they need to watch out for the trick play from the 35 that week. Candy from a baby.RoadDawg55 said:I know it's confirmation bias, but I only remember the times Petersen has been wrong. I can think of quite a few scenarios. When has he been right in a coaching situation?
-
By thumper, I don't mean a guy who is 220-240 lbs but isn't fast or not a natural runner.
For 2017, this Cali RB is what I'm talking about but will be 99.69696969696969696969696969% impossible to flip him from Alabama:
https://rivals.yahoo.com/washington/football/recruiting/player-Najee-Harris-165648RoadDawg55 said:I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
-
Jeezus dude.HFNY said:By thumper, I don't mean a guy who is 220-240 lbs but isn't fast or not a natural runner.
For 2017, this Cali RB is what I'm talking about but will be 99.69696969696969696969696969% impossible to flip him from Alabama:
https://rivals.yahoo.com/washington/football/recruiting/player-Najee-Harris-165648RoadDawg55 said:I hate the cliche of needing a thumper. Bishop Sankey never needed to come out of the game and he wasn't a "thumper." Dalvin Cook on FSU isn't either. Just get some good fucking RB's. Gaskin is one.
-
Small RBs off the top of my head:
Justin Forsett
Jahvid Best
Shane Vereen
LaMichael James
DAT
Jaquizz Rodgers
Nic Grigsby
Keola Antolin
Darren Sproles
Maurice Jones-Drew
Steve Slaton
etc.
Are we done here, or do I need to keep going??? -
You should just get stoned with them. It's perfectly acceptable business practice in the tech world. That and keep a fifth of Makers in your desk drawer.topdawgnc said:This is where Peterman probably misses an AD who gets it.
If UW had an AD who:
A) Was straight Cared about winning
C) Understood football
He would be pushing Peterman ... not accepting his bullshit.
It's like when I go into a conversation with an IT director. The fucker will talk me in circles, unless I go in with some asshole who speaks that geek shit. Then the IT director knows he is fucked and has to do what I am wanting. -
NipNap you motherfucker!ThomasFremont said:Small RBs off the top of my head:
Justin Forsett
Jahvid Best
Shane Vereen
LaMichael James
DAT
Jaquizz Rodgers
Nic Grigsby
Keola Antolin
Darren Sproles
Maurice Jones-Drew
Steve Slaton
etc.
Are we done here, or do I need to keep going??? -
So we? DO need to keep going...it that what you're saying?dnc said:
NipNap you motherfucker!ThomasFremont said:Small RBs off the top of my head:
Justin Forsett
Jahvid Best
Shane Vereen
LaMichael James
DAT
Jaquizz Rodgers
Nic Grigsby
Keola Antolin
Darren Sproles
Maurice Jones-Drew
Steve Slaton
etc.
Are we done here, or do I need to keep going??? -
ewwAZDuck said:
You should just get stoned with them. It's perfectly acceptable business practice in the tech world. That and keep a fifth of Makers in your desk drawer.topdawgnc said:This is where Peterman probably misses an AD who gets it.
If UW had an AD who:
A) Was straight Cared about winning
C) Understood football
He would be pushing Peterman ... not accepting his bullshit.
It's like when I go into a conversation with an IT director. The fucker will talk me in circles, unless I go in with some asshole who speaks that geek shit. Then the IT director knows he is fucked and has to do what I am wanting. -
Seriously, we are better than that.TommySQC said:
ewwAZDuck said:
You should just get stoned with them. It's perfectly acceptable business practice in the tech world. That and keep a fifth of Makers in your desk drawer.topdawgnc said:This is where Peterman probably misses an AD who gets it.
If UW had an AD who:
A) Was straight Cared about winning
C) Understood football
He would be pushing Peterman ... not accepting his bullshit.
It's like when I go into a conversation with an IT director. The fucker will talk me in circles, unless I go in with some asshole who speaks that geek shit. Then the IT director knows he is fucked and has to do what I am wanting. -
So what's your point? Some big Pac-10 / Pac-12 backs:
Chris Polk
Toby Gerhart
Royce Freeman
Corey Dillon
Greg Lewis
Steven Jackson
LenDale White
DeShaun Foster
Jonathan Stewart
Buck Allen
LeGarrette Blount
etc etc etc
In an ideal world, you have both thunder and lightning like LenDale White and Reggie Bush.ThomasFremont said:Small RBs off the top of my head:
Justin Forsett
Jahvid Best
Shane Vereen
LaMichael James
DAT
Jaquizz Rodgers
Nic Grigsby
Keola Antolin
Darren Sproles
Maurice Jones-Drew
Steve Slaton
etc.
Are we done here, or do I need to keep going??? -
My point is you're a stupid doog if you think Gaskin getting bigger makes any fucking difference. Actually, you've proven your doog status time and time again. But I'' help you out since you still don't "get it"...HFNY said:So what's your point? Some big Pac-10 / Pac-12 backs:
Chris Polk
Toby Gerhart
Royce Freeman
Corey Dillon
Greg Lewis
Steven Jackson
LenDale White
DeShaun Foster
Jonathan Stewart
Buck Allen
LeGarrette Blount
etc etc etc
In an ideal world, you have both thunder and lightning like LenDale White and Reggie Bush.ThomasFremont said:Small RBs off the top of my head:
Justin Forsett
Jahvid Best
Shane Vereen
LaMichael James
DAT
Jaquizz Rodgers
Nic Grigsby
Keola Antolin
Darren Sproles
Maurice Jones-Drew
Steve Slaton
etc.
Are we done here, or do I need to keep going???
Small RBs have had huge amounts of success in this league. So have big ones.
The difference is they tend to get some fucking carries.
But go ahead and think of some more little details or "tweaks" that will fix this mess.
tl;dr
FUCK.OFF. -
Stop being a whiny little cunt...only your blood soaked panties can try to turn a good article about Gaskin stepping up as a true frosh and me looking forward to him getting stronger into throwing around the term "Doog" like it's going out of style.
And never did I say some more little details or tweaks will fix anything. WTF.
You must feel cooler by making straw-men arguments and then attacking them because there isn't any rational explanation for your rivers of cuntiness.ThomasFremont said:
My point is you're a stupid doog if you think Gaskin getting bigger makes any fucking difference. Actually, you've proven your doog status time and time again. But I'' help you out since you still don't "get it"...HFNY said:So what's your point? Some big Pac-10 / Pac-12 backs:
Chris Polk
Toby Gerhart
Royce Freeman
Corey Dillon
Greg Lewis
Steven Jackson
LenDale White
DeShaun Foster
Jonathan Stewart
Buck Allen
LeGarrette Blount
etc etc etc
In an ideal world, you have both thunder and lightning like LenDale White and Reggie Bush.ThomasFremont said:Small RBs off the top of my head:
Justin Forsett
Jahvid Best
Shane Vereen
LaMichael James
DAT
Jaquizz Rodgers
Nic Grigsby
Keola Antolin
Darren Sproles
Maurice Jones-Drew
Steve Slaton
etc.
Are we done here, or do I need to keep going???
Small RBs have had huge amounts of success in this league. So have big ones.
The difference is they tend to get some fucking carries.
But go ahead and think of some more little details or "tweaks" that will fix this mess.
tl;dr
FUCK.OFF.
