Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Going for it on 4th and 1

Baseman
Baseman Member Posts: 12,382
in Hardcore Husky Board
In response to Race's post: college teams who go for it on 4-1 convert 75% of the time. Analytics show going for it on 4&1 anywhere over midfield to the opponents 30 has a 4:1 payoff as opposed to punting. In short, Smith/Peterman are stupid and Tequilla doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    We used to make fun of TequillaFS at the old HHB. Seems like this place is trending towards resembling a different site. One where the doog is king.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Can't expect the boys in black, chrome, grey, and purple to compete on 4th and 1 with such a young O Line.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Nevadaduck
    Nevadaduck Member Posts: 193
    Well, in defense of the offensive line...
































    .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    We used to make fun of TequillaFS at the old HHB. Seems like this place is trending towards resembling a different site. One where the doog is king.

    I have thought this site resembled doogman before. And it can at times. Then I went and looked at doogman after the Cal game and saw that I was mostly wrong.
    Yeah, cuz all the doogs came over here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,553 Swaye's Wigwam
    I think a lot of posters actually supported this hire and can't bring themselves to admit just how bad Petersen has done. Many that didn't seem like Doogs a few years ago when Sark was coaching actually are. So we are seeing a lot of the same doogish shit we have read for years... Needs more time. Too young. Highlight individual players as if mediocre programs never have some good players. Blame Sark/Ty/Gilby/Neu.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I think a lot of posters actually supported this hire and can't bring themselves to admit just how bad Petersen has done. Many that didn't seem like Doogs a few years ago when Sark was coaching actually are. So we are seeing a lot of the same doogish shit we have read for years... Needs more time. Too young. Highlight individual players as if mediocre programs never have some good players. Blame Sark/Ty/Gilby/Neu.

    I supported the hire. I still think it was the hire with the best chance of success at the time, non Mora division.

    That said, he has sucked so far, no question. The only thing that separates him from the reign of dreck before him is he has at least eliminated the plunger from our vocabulary (at least until this Saturday). I know, Sark is better than Ty, yadda yadda yadda.

    He's not getting fired after this year, I think we all know that. He needs to get this shit figured out. I'd be a lot more confident he would if he had an AD that GAF about football.

    In conclusion, TSIFO, but I'm still barely in LIFPO mode on the hire. Uf we look like this this time next year I'll be the one registering www.FirePeterman.org.

    SoFuckingIrritating.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter