Clinton promises manditory gun confiscation
Comments
-
Actually the facts fall right in line with my argument. Again, you can't see what's right in front of you.PurpleJ said:Hondo is able to show his doog colors without even talking football. Impressive.
#hatesfacts -
My words are destroying you.2001400ex said:
Race hates his own words.RaceBannon said:
The sound of Race showing you to be a lying sack of shit2001400ex said:
The sound of Race realizing he's stupid. And gullible.RaceBannon said:No you aren't. They confiscated guns asshole. Just like Hilary wants to
Fuck off
Fuck off -
It's actually sad how hard Honda is winning this thread.
Some of you should be embarrassed. -
-
It didn't work assfucker. Crime rose until the people figured out they needed guns to protect themselves from the bad guys. Now more people have guns today than before the confiscation. What do you think happened with crime fuctard?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
Disagree
-
Agreeallpurpleallgold said:Disagree
-
Do you think I fucking care? You're a fucking asshat liberalallpurpleallgold said:Disagree
-
The goal wasn't to confiscate all guns. The goal was to pay fair value for certain firearms and have a national registry, and reduced deaths from gun violence. Which all of the above has happened. Even the people saying this was fucked up showed stats that murders by guns declined from 32% to 13%.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It didn't work assfucker. Crime rose until the people figured out they needed guns to protect themselves from the bad guys. Now more people have guns today than before the confiscation. What do you think happened with crime fuctard?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
Reading is your friend, and if you use comprehension it works even better. Rather than your preconceived notions, which are false.
