Clinton promises manditory gun confiscation
Comments
-
From your own link:Blackie said:
Idiot.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
smh.com.au/news/national/gun-laws-fall-short-in-war-on-crime/2005/10/28/1130400366681.html
There has been a fall in firearms murders (from 32 to 13 per cent)
HTH -
Just stating facts.sarktastic said:
Why the fuck does it matter to you what people buy with their own money?... is it simple jealousy?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
No you aren't. They confiscated guns asshole. Just like Hilary wants to
Fuck off -
crime
By Robert Wainwright
October 29, 2005
Page Tools
Related
A man of calibre
Gun ownership is rising and there is no definitive evidence that a decade of restrictive firearms laws has done anything to reduce weapon-related crime, according to NSW's top criminal statistician.
The latest figures show a renaissance in firearm ownership in the state - a 25 per cent increase in three years. And the head of the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Don Weatherburn, said falls in armed robberies and abductions in NSW in the past few years had more to do with the heroin drought and good policing than firearms legislation.
Even falls in the homicide rate, which have been steady, began long before the gun law debate provoked by the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.
Nationwide, the proportion of robberies involving weapons is the same as it was in 1996, while the proportion of abductions involving weapons is higher, the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics fiures reveal. They show a mixed result in firearms-related offences since the mid-1990s. There has been a fall in firearms murders (from 32 to 13 per cent) but a rise (19 to 23 per cent) in attempted murders involving guns.
Advertisement
Advertisement
"I would need to see more convincing evidence than there is to be able to say that gun laws have had any effect," Dr Weatherburn said. "The best that could be said for the tougher laws is there has been no other mass killing using firearms [since Port Arthur].
"There has been a drop in firearm-related crime, particularly in homicide, but it began long before the new laws and has continued on afterwards. I don't think anyone really understands why. A lot of people assume that the tougher laws did it, but I would need more specific, convincing evidence … -
The sound of Race realizing he's stupid. And gullible.RaceBannon said:No you aren't. They confiscated guns asshole. Just like Hilary wants to
Fuck off -
The sound of Race showing you to be a lying sack of shit2001400ex said:
The sound of Race realizing he's stupid. And gullible.RaceBannon said:No you aren't. They confiscated guns asshole. Just like Hilary wants to
Fuck off
Fuck off -
Race hates his own words.RaceBannon said:
The sound of Race showing you to be a lying sack of shit2001400ex said:
The sound of Race realizing he's stupid. And gullible.RaceBannon said:No you aren't. They confiscated guns asshole. Just like Hilary wants to
Fuck off
Fuck off -
Finish the sentence, idiot.2001400ex said:
From your own link:Blackie said:
Idiot.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
smh.com.au/news/national/gun-laws-fall-short-in-war-on-crime/2005/10/28/1130400366681.html
There has been a fall in firearms murders (from 32 to 13 per cent)
HTH
"...but a rise (19 to 23 per cent) in attempted murders involving guns."
Also:
"I would need to see more convincing evidence than there is to be able to say that gun laws have had any effect," Dr Weatherburn said. " -
So is your argument, that murders deceased from 32% to 13%, but attempted murders went up 19 to 23%? Because here is a question. How many of those attempted murders would have been actual murders if they had better weapons?Blackie said:
Finish the sentence, idiot.2001400ex said:
From your own link:Blackie said:
Idiot.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
smh.com.au/news/national/gun-laws-fall-short-in-war-on-crime/2005/10/28/1130400366681.html
There has been a fall in firearms murders (from 32 to 13 per cent)
HTH
"...but a rise (19 to 23 per cent) in attempted murders involving guns."
Also:
"I would need to see more convincing evidence than there is to be able to say that gun laws have had any effect," Dr Weatherburn said. "
Just sayin. -
Hondo is able to show his doog colors without even talking football. Impressive.
#hatesfacts -
Actually the facts fall right in line with my argument. Again, you can't see what's right in front of you.PurpleJ said:Hondo is able to show his doog colors without even talking football. Impressive.
#hatesfacts -
My words are destroying you.2001400ex said:
Race hates his own words.RaceBannon said:
The sound of Race showing you to be a lying sack of shit2001400ex said:
The sound of Race realizing he's stupid. And gullible.RaceBannon said:No you aren't. They confiscated guns asshole. Just like Hilary wants to
Fuck off
Fuck off -
It's actually sad how hard Honda is winning this thread.
Some of you should be embarrassed. -
-
It didn't work assfucker. Crime rose until the people figured out they needed guns to protect themselves from the bad guys. Now more people have guns today than before the confiscation. What do you think happened with crime fuctard?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
Disagree
-
Agreeallpurpleallgold said:Disagree
-
Do you think I fucking care? You're a fucking asshat liberalallpurpleallgold said:Disagree
-
The goal wasn't to confiscate all guns. The goal was to pay fair value for certain firearms and have a national registry, and reduced deaths from gun violence. Which all of the above has happened. Even the people saying this was fucked up showed stats that murders by guns declined from 32% to 13%.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It didn't work assfucker. Crime rose until the people figured out they needed guns to protect themselves from the bad guys. Now more people have guns today than before the confiscation. What do you think happened with crime fuctard?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
Reading is your friend, and if you use comprehension it works even better. Rather than your preconceived notions, which are false. -
I wasn't talking to you.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Do you think I fucking care? You're a fucking asshat liberalallpurpleallgold said:Disagree
-
"fair value" LOL2001400ex said:
The goal wasn't to confiscate all guns. The goal was to pay fair value for certain firearms and have a national registry, and reduced deaths from gun violence. Which all of the above has happened. Even the people saying this was fucked up showed stats that murders by guns declined from 32% to 13%.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It didn't work assfucker. Crime rose until the people figured out they needed guns to protect themselves from the bad guys. Now more people have guns today than before the confiscation. What do you think happened with crime fuctard?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
Reading is your friend, and if you use comprehension it works even better. Rather than your preconceived notions, which are false.
