Clinton promises manditory gun confiscation
Wonder if this is the issue that will finally topple Bernie.
Comments
-
Fuck you are stupid. And gullible.
-
for believing what she says?
-
-
That's a good pointTierbsHsotBoobs said: -
REAL liberals love the 2nd amendment.
-
No, I wouldn't believe what she says. I'll give you that. But she didn't say that. So for that reason, you are still stupid. And gullible.sarktastic said:for believing what she says?
-
Sure, she did.
did you really miss it again? -
But how does Hondo suck Hillarys cock?
-
Where's the "can't have a link buttfucker...." quote when you need it?
-
Wait, I thought Obama already took our guns.
-
Time someone got serious about gun control!!
Doesn't anyone care for the victims of gun violence???
The nation is outraged and the people of this once great nation aren't going to take it anymore!!
-
They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
-
Just like the Brady bill was a slippery slope to confiscation, right?greenblood said:They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
-
The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't -
The Brady bill was the introduction of a background checking system. What does that have to do with this?2001400ex said:
Just like the Brady bill was a slippery slope to confiscation, right?greenblood said:They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
I'm also for even more strict background checks, as I've expressed on numerous occassions. The federal government is also wanting to restrict certain gun purchase from sane law abiding citizens, which I'm totally against. Don't throw Brady bill nonsense to confuse the argument. Most don't think so, but I tend to think you're better than that. -
Got a link, mate?RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
-
Down under.UWhuskytskeet said:
Got a link, mate?RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
Correction: October 17, 2015
Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article gave an incorrect description of an Australian gun buyback program. It was mandatory, not voluntary.
nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/16/hillary-clinton-calling-out-the-n-r-a-gets-a-quick-reply/ -
Sounds more like pandering to her audience than a promise to actually confiscate guns, but still more truth to the topic than I expected to see. Pretty dumb of her to even entertain the thought at this point. Thanks for the link.
-
I agree that it's probably pandering to a voting base, but I'm not ok voting for someone that probably didn't mean what he/she said in regards to gun ownership laws. This issue is such a big deal for me, that I'm not willing to take a chance on it.UWhuskytskeet said:Sounds more like pandering to her audience than a promise to actually confiscate guns, but still more truth to the topic than I expected to see. Pretty dumb of her to even entertain the thought at this point. Thanks for the link.
-
We're told 11,000,000 illegal aliens can't be found and deported by the same folks who believe we can outlaw and confiscate 330,000,000 guns
-
The Brady bill also limited sales of "assualt rifles" and the argument against it was the slippery slope argument. Hence why there was a 10 year time bomb on it. And it was not renewed after 10 years.greenblood said:
The Brady bill was the introduction of a background checking system. What does that have to do with this?2001400ex said:
Just like the Brady bill was a slippery slope to confiscation, right?greenblood said:They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
I'm also for even more strict background checks, as I've expressed on numerous occassions. The federal government is also wanting to restrict certain gun purchase from sane law abiding citizens, which I'm totally against. Don't throw Brady bill nonsense to confuse the argument. Most don't think so, but I tend to think you're better than that. -
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
I am glad I don't have to rely on you to protect my freedom.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
Serious question here. No bullshit. If the government shows up in a tank, what is any gun you own going to do to save you?Swaye said:
I am glad I don't have to rely on you to protect my freedom.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
In a @doogsinparadise administration only the bad guys will have guns. Everyone else will be issued a tank.
-
They didn't confiscate all guns just the guns of the law abiding citizens stupid enough to give them up when asked. Thanks for adding nothing to the discussion.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
You need to link your assertion because I've seen just the opposite. The criminals still have their guns -
I like to argue something I know nothing about. Cause that's what I like to do.RaceBannon said:
They didn't confiscate all guns just the guns of the law abiding citizens stupid enough to give them up when asked. Thanks for adding nothing to the discussion.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
You need to link your assertion because I've seen just the opposite. The criminals still have their guns
A common misconception is that firearms are illegal in Australia and that no individual may possess them. Although it is true that Australia has restrictive firearms laws, rifles and shotguns (both of which include semi-automatics), as well as handguns, are all legal within a narrow set of criteria.
As of 2015 about 815,000 people had a gun licence in Australia and there were around 3.5 to 5.5 million Registered Firearms in Australia. Most people own and use firearms for purposes such as hunting, controlling feral animals, collecting, security work, and target shooting.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Australia
You see... They only bought 650k assault style weapons. -
They will be illegal so bad guys can't have them either duh
-
Why the fuck does it matter to you what people buy with their own money?... is it simple jealousy?2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy. -
Idiot.2001400ex said:
First it's stupid of Hillary to suggest in any way that what worked in Australia is viable here.RaceBannon said:The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.
I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.
but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.
Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
That being said, they didn't confiscate all guns. They paid fair value for "assault weapons". And murder and suicide rates dropped drastically since.
Taking currently owned guns away from people won't happen in America. Our society is different than Australia, we have way more people that cling to guns. Being able to own 11 pistols isn't enough, they want to own the biggest gun they can buy.
smh.com.au/news/national/gun-laws-fall-short-in-war-on-crime/2005/10/28/1130400366681.html
