Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW vs OR metrics

I know Chest hit on it in the last podcast, but here are the adv stats ranking between the two teams about half way thru the year.

we are better

S&P+ UW 23, OR 64
FEI UW 35, OR 45
F/+ (blended between two above stats) UW 31, UO 55
FPI (still has SC #4 FWIW) UW 38, UO, 42
SRS UW 30, UO 75

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    BlowItUp said:



    Any time he has to go past 20 yards he is completely inaccurate and any time the pocket breaks down he shits the bed (esp if it's an important down).

    FMFYFE.

    you mean like that 3rd down at the goal line in the Utah St game? ;)
    Fucking shit. I knew some fucktard would bring that up.

    Okay, for the short-bus Broooogs, how about an important down when we were even or behind against a decent team? Because I can name about 20 downs that MATTERED where he shit the bed.
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,284
    Myles Gaskin is gonna skullfuck those guys.
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,320 Founders Club
    HuskyJW said:

    Myles Gaskin is gonna skullfuck those guys.

    He will if they commit to handing the ball off to him 20-25 times.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    wobidbus said:

    I agree with everything but he is capable of hitting those throws he fucked up on against SC

    DWarsh TD2
    image

    Strike to Mickens
    image


    Y,BS...
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    wobidbus said:

    I agree with everything but he is capable of hitting those throws he fucked up on against SC

    DWarsh TD2
    image

    Strike to Mickens
    image


    Keep in mind, two of those deep passes (the two underthrown ones to Perkins) were broken up by USC defenders.

    Against Oregon's secondary, those go for TDs.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560

    I actually believe we have to throw in this game. The secondary for Oregon truly is terrible. Bubble screens might even work, there were several times that I've seen UO and the corners are 12 yards off with no LB in support for a bubble screen. It's a free 8-10 yards.

    If we can't throw the ball against Oregon we should just set ourselves on fire.

    At this point, if you lose to Oregon you might as well move to the Big Sky.
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)

    but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.

    http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    BlowItUp said:

    watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)

    but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.

    http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen

    No see, that wasn't a mix up. If you watch again, Pellum drew up a beautiful coverage scheme where our defensive lineman (Buckner) drops back into one on one coverage with a slot receiver. I have no idea how Utah was able to foil that one.
    LOL. That's the worst defensive call I've seen in years
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited October 2015

    BlowItUp said:

    watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)

    but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.

    http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen

    No see, that wasn't a mix up. If you watch again, Pellum drew up a beautiful coverage scheme where our defensive lineman (Buckner) drops back into one on one coverage with a slot receiver. I have no idea how Utah was able to foil that one.
    LOL. That's the worst defensive call I've seen in years
    That ups me, because I've never seen worse. This is the mastermind that Browning is going up against.
  • priapism
    priapism Member Posts: 2,305
    BlowItUp said:

    watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)

    but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.

    http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen


    Hall will easily pass for 5 TDs against this secondary.

    The punt at 2:13 = LOL
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,142

    TMacDawg said:



    Babushka, like all other fucktarded ex-QB offensive coordinators, thinks that passing is the offense and that running is just something you do so you can be tricky with play-action.

    Babushka, like all other fucktarded ex-QB offensive coordinators, thinks that out-scheming his opponent means drawing up a million different play combinations so that he has them set up for his amazing imaginary series once they are so confused from seeing all the looks the D has been given.

    The problem with all these fucktarded OCs is that they don't give a shit about what works and using their talent to its best advantage. They play faggy mind-chess and try to show how fucking clever they are by out-thinking the opponent and dialing up a game-plan that shows their genius.

    Any time we've had success under Babushka, he completely over-schemes out of what has had success into his faggy mind-chess world and kills our offense.

    As a fucktarded OC, I endorse this post. There's a tendency to not repeat successful plays because you assume the D is expecting it, so you drift away from it with the intention of drifting back. By the time you drift back, you've punted 3 times and Sarked away the game.
    just FYI... Babushka ran the same formation and run set 14 times against USC. It worked nearly every time (Sample at true TE, with RB flanked to Browning).

    For the first time I could remember he actually stuck with something that was working.
    That's because Pete had a playcard hth.
    I hope so, but Pete loves trickery, motion based bullshit more than anyone. We have all figured that out by now, right?