UW vs OR metrics
Comments
-
No see, that wasn't a mix up. If you watch again, Pellum drew up a beautiful coverage scheme where our defensive lineman (Buckner) drops back into one on one coverage with a slot receiver. I have no idea how Utah was able to foil that one.BlowItUp said:watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)
but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.
http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen -
LOL. That's the worst defensive call I've seen in yearsgreenblood said:
No see, that wasn't a mix up. If you watch again, Pellum drew up a beautiful coverage scheme where our defensive lineman (Buckner) drops back into one on one coverage with a slot receiver. I have no idea how Utah was able to foil that one.BlowItUp said:watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)
but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.
http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen -
That ups me, because I've never seen worse. This is the mastermind that Browning is going up against.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
LOL. That's the worst defensive call I've seen in yearsgreenblood said:
No see, that wasn't a mix up. If you watch again, Pellum drew up a beautiful coverage scheme where our defensive lineman (Buckner) drops back into one on one coverage with a slot receiver. I have no idea how Utah was able to foil that one.BlowItUp said:watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)
but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.
http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen -
-
BlowItUp said:
watch this whole thing for secondary fails 101 (this is travis fucking wilson after all)
but skip to 2:00 and watch the miscommunication in the redzone. brutal.
http://pac-12.com/videos/highlights-no-18-utah-dominates-no-13-oregon-autzen
Hall will easily pass for 5 TDs against this secondary.
The punt at 2:13 = LOL -
I hope so, but Pete loves trickery, motion based bullshit more than anyone. We have all figured that out by now, right?WilburHooksHands said:
That's because Pete had a playcard hth.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
just FYI... Babushka ran the same formation and run set 14 times against USC. It worked nearly every time (Sample at true TE, with RB flanked to Browning).TMacDawg said:
As a fucktarded OC, I endorse this post. There's a tendency to not repeat successful plays because you assume the D is expecting it, so you drift away from it with the intention of drifting back. By the time you drift back, you've punted 3 times and Sarked away the game.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Babushka, like all other fucktarded ex-QB offensive coordinators, thinks that passing is the offense and that running is just something you do so you can be tricky with play-action.
Babushka, like all other fucktarded ex-QB offensive coordinators, thinks that out-scheming his opponent means drawing up a million different play combinations so that he has them set up for his amazing imaginary series once they are so confused from seeing all the looks the D has been given.
The problem with all these fucktarded OCs is that they don't give a shit about what works and using their talent to its best advantage. They play faggy mind-chess and try to show how fucking clever they are by out-thinking the opponent and dialing up a game-plan that shows their genius.
Any time we've had success under Babushka, he completely over-schemes out of what has had success into his faggy mind-chess world and kills our offense.
For the first time I could remember he actually stuck with something that was working.
