Agreed. Sarkisian invariably won his home games while being strongly favored against a less talented opponent (but then he'd go on the road and lose to WSU or Oregon State).
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
If he has nothing to work with on offense after 18 months of development, he probably sucks.
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
If he has nothing to work with on offense after 18 months of development, he probably sucks.
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
If he has nothing to work with on offense after 18 months of development, he probably sucks.
Hope this helps.
Ossai's don't grow on trees, you know.
So we need to wait until 2019 to have a competent OL?
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
If he has nothing to work with on offense after 18 months of development, he probably sucks.
Hope this helps.
Ossai's don't grow on trees, you know.
So we need to wait until 2019 to have a competent OL?
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
If he has nothing to work with on offense after 18 months of development, he probably sucks.
Hope this helps.
Ossai's don't grow on trees, you know.
So we need to wait until 2019 to have a competent OL?
Nah, but I think the first real (Pac-12) game those guys have played is too soon. They should get better through the year, or else FYFMFE.
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
If he has nothing to work with on offense after 18 months of development, he probably sucks.
Hope this helps.
Ossai's don't grow on trees, you know.
So we need to wait until 2019 to have a competent OL?
Nah, but I think the first real (Pac-12) game those guys have played is too soon. They should get better through the year, or else FYFMFE.
Expecting them to get more than 17 points against FUCKING Cal at home is too much apparently.
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
4 years of bad offense for Petersen. Time to open your eyes. It wasn't youth that made the coaches abandon the running game against Cal. It wasn't youth last year either.
Youth would likely prevent the offense from being really good. It isn't the reason they have been the worst in the PAC 12.
I know. Water is wet. But listening to the pods was really depressing. I'm feeling depressed.
I see stubbornness getting in the way. The signs are there. The. hart is stubborn. The lack of change and progression on offense is stubborn. I think the stubbornness is making him delusional. He says the offense is progressing. But last week was the worst performance of his tenure as UW coach.
The pod talked about James when he made a change? When will that be for Petersen? What will it take? A boatrace? An assplunger? Will it be too late?
I hope the defense doesn't give up. They pass the eye test. They look more and more like a Husky Defense each week.. They are progressing each game. The defense at this point is acceptable. I did not expect the worst offense in the conference from Petersen.
The sizzle is gone.
Droggins welcome to HH, now t a ke your retarted giner back outta here. Dipshits like yourself epitomize the dawgman poster. You know zero what you speak spanky
I know. Water is wet. But listening to the pods was really depressing. I'm feeling depressed.
I see stubbornness getting in the way. The signs are there. The. hart is stubborn. The lack of change and progression on offense is stubborn. I think the stubbornness is making him delusional. He says the offense is progressing. But last week was the worst performance of his tenure as UW coach.
The pod talked about James when he made a change? When will that be for Petersen? What will it take? A boatrace? An assplunger? Will it be too late?
I hope the defense doesn't give up. They pass the eye test. They look more and more like a Husky Defense each week.. They are progressing each game. The defense at this point is acceptable. I did not expect the worst offense in the conference from Petersen.
The sizzle is gone.
Droggins welcome to HH, now t a ke your retarted giner back outta here. Dipshits like yourself epitomize the dawgman poster. You know zero what you speak spanky
I know. Water is wet. But listening to the pods was really depressing. I'm feeling depressed.
I see stubbornness getting in the way. The signs are there. The. hart is stubborn. The lack of change and progression on offense is stubborn. I think the stubbornness is making him delusional. He says the offense is progressing. But last week was the worst performance of his tenure as UW coach.
The pod talked about James when he made a change? When will that be for Petersen? What will it take? A boatrace? An assplunger? Will it be too late?
I hope the defense doesn't give up. They pass the eye test. They look more and more like a Husky Defense each week.. They are progressing each game. The defense at this point is acceptable. I did not expect the worst offense in the conference from Petersen.
The sizzle is gone.
Droggins welcome to HH, now t a ke your retarted giner back outta here. Dipshits like yourself epitomize the dawgman poster. You know zero what you speak spanky
Off the meds Friday. Buckle up
Boobs welcome to HH, now t a ke your retarted giner back outta here. Dipshits like yourself epitomize the dawgman poster. You know zero what you speak spanky
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
4 years of bad offense for Petersen. Time to open your eyes. It wasn't youth that made the coaches abandon the running game against Cal. It wasn't youth last year either.
Youth would likely prevent the offense from being really good. It isn't the reason they have been the worst in the PAC 12.
This offense is the biggest shit sandwich since Willingham, I agree. Smith is playcalling shit that needs diverse skills from his OL, it's an all around circus shitshow. But look at that depth chart...it's full of true and RS frosh starting and/or that are almost as good as the SR talent today. I'm just sayin'. I've never seen anything like it on a roster.
We will literally losing nothing on offense. Zero. Nada. Not a single quality player. I might be dooging, but I'm excited for the future Renfro, McC, Moontlake Jake, and Gaskin and OL with more experience.
WR 8 Pettis, Dante SO 18 Renfro, Isaiah FR WR 4 Mickens, Jaydon SR/3 13 McClatcher, Chico FR WR 81 Lenius, Brayden SO 16 Hall, Marvin SR/3 LT 72 Adams, Trey FR 73 Kirkland, Andrew SO LG 79 Shelton, Coleman SO 52 Eldrenkamp, Jake JR OC 65 Tufunga, Siosifa SR/3 67 Kneip, Michael JR RG 75 Sosebee, Jesse RS FR 60 Brostek, Shane JR RT 58 McGary, Kaleb RS FR 71 James, Matt RS FR TE 82 Perkins, Joshua SR/3 15 Daniels, Darrell JR QB 3 Browning, Jake FR 5 Lindquist, Jeff JR RB 12 Washington, Dwayne JR 9 Gaskin, Myles FR
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
4 years of bad offense for Petersen. Time to open your eyes. It wasn't youth that made the coaches abandon the running game against Cal. It wasn't youth last year either.
Youth would likely prevent the offense from being really good. It isn't the reason they have been the worst in the PAC 12.
This offense is the biggest shit sandwich since Willingham, I agree. Smith is playcalling shit that needs diverse skills from his OL, it's an all around circus shitshow. But look at that depth chart...it's full of true and RS frosh starting and/or that are almost as good as the SR talent today. I'm just sayin'. I've never seen anything like it on a roster.
We will literally losing nothing on offense. Zero. Nada. Not a single quality player. I might be dooging, but I'm excited for the future Renfro, McC, Moontlake Jake, and Gaskin and OL with more experience.
WR 8 Pettis, Dante SO 18 Renfro, Isaiah FR WR 4 Mickens, Jaydon SR/3 13 McClatcher, Chico FR WR 81 Lenius, Brayden SO 16 Hall, Marvin SR/3 LT 72 Adams, Trey FR 73 Kirkland, Andrew SO LG 79 Shelton, Coleman SO 52 Eldrenkamp, Jake JR OC 65 Tufunga, Siosifa SR/3 67 Kneip, Michael JR RG 75 Sosebee, Jesse RS FR 60 Brostek, Shane JR RT 58 McGary, Kaleb RS FR 71 James, Matt RS FR TE 82 Perkins, Joshua SR/3 15 Daniels, Darrell JR QB 3 Browning, Jake FR 5 Lindquist, Jeff JR RB 12 Washington, Dwayne JR 9 Gaskin, Myles FR
You are correct. The personnel on offense is very green and at this stage not good. Its near the bottom of the league. However, is it worse than OSU, Colorado and WSU's? The offense is the worst in the conference by most stats and that is unacceptable. It shouldn't be too much to expect it to finish 9th or 10th in the conference. The concern as Roadie points out (I like to call him Roadie) is Pete's offense wasnt good at the end of his tenure at Boise and nothing has changed so far here. There is no identity.
The offense should improve and develop as the year goes on. Mike Monan told me that after 5 weeks the new OL group should be better because thats how long it takes a new group to gel. Thats in 3 more weeks which leaves them those last 5 winnable games. Pettis is an all-league caliber returner, Lenius has size and good hands, Dwayne Washington is a big play threat who if used correctly would be an all-league guy. Daniels is a very good receiver and matchup problem. Browning should only improve. The OL will get better as it gels.
Problem is, there isn't any indication that the offense will improve as it should. They bungled the Cal game. They have no identity. Its unreasonable to expect it to be good this year but it should be near average in the second half of the year which puts it in position to take another step next season. If it doesn't show improvement from here until the end of the season than why can anyone reasonably expect it to improve next year?
2012: 53rd in scoring at BSU (with BSU's D ranking 6th in points allowed)
2013: 17th in scoring at BSU (Washington with the high powered brah was 19th and BSU's D slipped to 38th in scoring).
2014: 55th in scoring (while inheriting Miley Cyrus, his former team with all his players at BSU was 9th in scoring).
2015: 77th in scoring (while starting a true frosh and 7 underclassmen total on offense, his former team is 34th in scoring with 8 upperclassmen starting).
Look, I'm frustrated as well but some people are going a little overboard. With so many young players enduring a steep learning curve on offense, I believe the offense will get better especially since Browning has already flashed and and the unit that needs the most work (OL) is manned by the offense's best coach (Strausser).
Anyone who expected 8 wins is FS and even 7 wins was being optimistic. I expected 6 wins and a bowel game and with the team playing well in 2 of 3 facets of the game, the team is probably still on track. Now if we were starting older players (Lindquist, Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Hall) and still 2-2 with the offense looking bad, I wouldn't have much hope since the offense would be starting 8 upperclassmen but Petersen decided to go with a true frosh at QB and he / Strausser had seen enough of the older OL so they went young on the OL too.
I don't think you can judge Boises offense on a metric like total scoring. That metric will be dominated by points against shit teams. I believe it also includes all the defensive and ST TDs UW had last year.
FEI for CCP from 2010 to 2014 went: 17th, 23rd, 52nd, 49th, 98th
I'm not really sure where all of this pessimism is coming from...maybe I'm the worst doog in the world but he literally has nothing to work with on O. This is not the usual youth excuse: A true frosh QB that looks too young for Sandusky and a line that might not be the best in the WIAA this year. Geez.
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
4 years of bad offense for Petersen. Time to open your eyes. It wasn't youth that made the coaches abandon the running game against Cal. It wasn't youth last year either.
Youth would likely prevent the offense from being really good. It isn't the reason they have been the worst in the PAC 12.
This offense is the biggest shit sandwich since Willingham, I agree. Smith is playcalling shit that needs diverse skills from his OL, it's an all around circus shitshow. But look at that depth chart...it's full of true and RS frosh starting and/or that are almost as good as the SR talent today. I'm just sayin'. I've never seen anything like it on a roster.
We will literally losing nothing on offense. Zero. Nada. Not a single quality player. I might be dooging, but I'm excited for the future Renfro, McC, Moontlake Jake, and Gaskin and OL with more experience.
WR 8 Pettis, Dante SO 18 Renfro, Isaiah FR WR 4 Mickens, Jaydon SR/3 13 McClatcher, Chico FR WR 81 Lenius, Brayden SO 16 Hall, Marvin SR/3 LT 72 Adams, Trey FR 73 Kirkland, Andrew SO LG 79 Shelton, Coleman SO 52 Eldrenkamp, Jake JR OC 65 Tufunga, Siosifa SR/3 67 Kneip, Michael JR RG 75 Sosebee, Jesse RS FR 60 Brostek, Shane JR RT 58 McGary, Kaleb RS FR 71 James, Matt RS FR TE 82 Perkins, Joshua SR/3 15 Daniels, Darrell JR QB 3 Browning, Jake FR 5 Lindquist, Jeff JR RB 12 Washington, Dwayne JR 9 Gaskin, Myles FR
I know. Water is wet. But listening to the pods was really depressing. I'm feeling depressed.
I see stubbornness getting in the way. The signs are there. The Chart is stubborn. The lack of change and progression on offense is stubborn. I think the stubbornness is making him delusional. He says the offense is progressing. But last week was the worst performance of his tenure as UW coach.
The pod talked about James when he made a change? When will that be for Petersen? What will it take? A boatrace? An assplunger? Will it be too late?
I hope the defense doesn't give up. They pass the eye test. They look more and more like a Husky Defense each week.. They are progressing each game. The defense at this point is acceptable. I did not expect the worst offense in the conference from Petersen.
The sizzle is gone.
This is the best looking defense we've had here in almost TWENTY YEARS. Tough up front, linebackers (at least the two sophomores) flow to ball, hit hard, and stop ballcarriers at point of contact. Corners who can cover one vs one and be left on the island.
This will all come down to his ability to get the offense to be above average. It doesn't have to be lights out with what we have on defense, but it has to be upper 1/2 of conference.
2012: 53rd in scoring at BSU (with BSU's D ranking 6th in points allowed)
2013: 17th in scoring at BSU (Washington with the high powered brah was 19th and BSU's D slipped to 38th in scoring).
2014: 55th in scoring (while inheriting Miley Cyrus, his former team with all his players at BSU was 9th in scoring).
2015: 77th in scoring (while starting a true frosh and 7 underclassmen total on offense, his former team is 34th in scoring with 8 upperclassmen starting).
Look, I'm frustrated as well but some people are going a little overboard. With so many young players enduring a steep learning curve on offense, I believe the offense will get better especially since Browning has already flashed and and the unit that needs the most work (OL) is manned by the offense's best coach (Strausser).
Anyone who expected 8 wins is FS and even 7 wins was being optimistic. I expected 6 wins and a bowel game and with the team playing well in 2 of 3 facets of the game, the team is probably still on track. Now if we were starting older players (Lindquist, Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Hall) and still 2-2 with the offense looking bad, I wouldn't have much hope since the offense would be starting 8 upperclassmen but Petersen decided to go with a true frosh at QB and he / Strausser had seen enough of the older OL so they went young on the OL too.
This Summer I went back and watched the 2013 game against UW. They were borderline loaded (multiple NFL players and a senior QB) and scored 6 points.
Comments
The D was already deep and has remained that way, and Kwat has been incredible. Pesky Pete wasn't hired to recruit, he was hired to develop, and 18 months in you guys are all panties in a bunch. LIFPO.
I'm going back to Dawgman unless you guys invite me to STAY.
Hope this helps.
Youth would likely prevent the offense from being really good. It isn't the reason they have been the worst in the PAC 12.
We will literally losing nothing on offense. Zero. Nada. Not a single quality player. I might be dooging, but I'm excited for the future Renfro, McC, Moontlake Jake, and Gaskin and OL with more experience.
WR 8 Pettis, Dante SO 18 Renfro, Isaiah FR
WR 4 Mickens, Jaydon SR/3 13 McClatcher, Chico FR
WR 81 Lenius, Brayden SO 16 Hall, Marvin SR/3
LT 72 Adams, Trey FR 73 Kirkland, Andrew SO
LG 79 Shelton, Coleman SO 52 Eldrenkamp, Jake JR
OC 65 Tufunga, Siosifa SR/3 67 Kneip, Michael JR
RG 75 Sosebee, Jesse RS FR 60 Brostek, Shane JR
RT 58 McGary, Kaleb RS FR 71 James, Matt RS FR
TE 82 Perkins, Joshua SR/3 15 Daniels, Darrell JR
QB 3 Browning, Jake FR 5 Lindquist, Jeff JR
RB 12 Washington, Dwayne JR 9 Gaskin, Myles FR
You are correct. The personnel on offense is very green and at this stage not good. Its near the bottom of the league. However, is it worse than OSU, Colorado and WSU's? The offense is the worst in the conference by most stats and that is unacceptable. It shouldn't be too much to expect it to finish 9th or 10th in the conference. The concern as Roadie points out (I like to call him Roadie) is Pete's offense wasnt good at the end of his tenure at Boise and nothing has changed so far here. There is no identity.
The offense should improve and develop as the year goes on. Mike Monan told me that after 5 weeks the new OL group should be better because thats how long it takes a new group to gel. Thats in 3 more weeks which leaves them those last 5 winnable games. Pettis is an all-league caliber returner, Lenius has size and good hands, Dwayne Washington is a big play threat who if used correctly would be an all-league guy. Daniels is a very good receiver and matchup problem. Browning should only improve. The OL will get better as it gels.
Problem is, there isn't any indication that the offense will improve as it should. They bungled the Cal game. They have no identity. Its unreasonable to expect it to be good this year but it should be near average in the second half of the year which puts it in position to take another step next season. If it doesn't show improvement from here until the end of the season than why can anyone reasonably expect it to improve next year?
2012: 53rd in scoring at BSU (with BSU's D ranking 6th in points allowed)
2013: 17th in scoring at BSU (Washington with the high powered brah was 19th and BSU's D slipped to 38th in scoring).
2014: 55th in scoring (while inheriting Miley Cyrus, his former team with all his players at BSU was 9th in scoring).
2015: 77th in scoring (while starting a true frosh and 7 underclassmen total on offense, his former team is 34th in scoring with 8 upperclassmen starting).
Look, I'm frustrated as well but some people are going a little overboard. With so many young players enduring a steep learning curve on offense, I believe the offense will get better especially since Browning has already flashed and and the unit that needs the most work (OL) is manned by the offense's best coach (Strausser).
Anyone who expected 8 wins is FS and even 7 wins was being optimistic. I expected 6 wins and a bowel game and with the team playing well in 2 of 3 facets of the game, the team is probably still on track. Now if we were starting older players (Lindquist, Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Hall) and still 2-2 with the offense looking bad, I wouldn't have much hope since the offense would be starting 8 upperclassmen but Petersen decided to go with a true frosh at QB and he / Strausser had seen enough of the older OL so they went young on the OL too.
FEI for CCP from 2010 to 2014 went: 17th, 23rd, 52nd, 49th, 98th
Disagree, That offense moved the rock against #10 Ohio State
I actually lol'ed at @Tequilla's joke.