Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The excitement of Petersen has diminished significantly.

245

Comments

  • HuskiesADW
    HuskiesADW Member Posts: 141
    There are some positives going on here. Player development on defense and special teams is evident. I also like how the staff identifies talent while recruiting.

    I am a firm believer in giving most coaches three years to turn the program around and with Peterson I will stick to that.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Let's see how they look tomorrow and circle back and dig down on this topic.

    Bye is tough.
    It's the 2 year missions they send their linemen on.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    In other words doesn't matter who coaches this dumpster fire of a program.
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    ...and if we somehow find a way to beat USC, the dooging will go right back through the roof and Petersen will be the guy again.

    You must have forgotten thescript.gif.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,551 Swaye's Wigwam

    ...and if we somehow find a way to beat USC, the dooging will go right back through the roof and Petersen will be the guy again.

    I will take Pipe Dreams for $500, Alex.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,841
    I stand by my belief you give a coach three years.

    By the end of year three you know what you have.

    The signs are there that we know what we have in half that time ... but I will take Doog for $500 and give him the benefit he is cleaning up a mess.

  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,587
    Man, you just said in 4 sentences what I've been trying to sum up in 4 pages

    image
    AEB said:

    I'm still in denial. How can the D and Special Teams and player development and recruiting all show obvious advances and the offense still suck as bad as it does? I'm not ready to can him; I think this is fixable. There's too much good going on for this to be happening.