Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

10 Reported Dead at a Roseburg JC

1468910

Comments

  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    Yeah. Let's ban 4 chan. But god forbid, please keep it easy as fuck for the mentally ill to have access to guns. The NRA appreciates that.

    And now the shooter will be immortalized by the media and Wikipedia instead of dying a depressed nobody due to suicide.

    Fucking christ, really difficult issue. There's pretty much no way to prevent these type of events from happening either.

    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    WE GUN CONTROL

    Oh wait... Oregon has that. Fuck. Now what?
    You already said that. Were you hoping for more uproots the 2nd time around?
    What laws do you propose (that don't aleady exist) that would have prevented this. Please be specific.
    I'll take a crack at answering your question, after you answer mine, since I asked first.
    What was your question?
    Since you can't read, there is no point in me taking the time to write out a long answer to your question.
    Fucking cop out. You have no answers or a clue.

    I see some incoherent sentence about an uproot. Is that the question? I don't know what that means. But sure. I want an uproot. Now answer my question or just admit you have no fucking idea about this.
    That was "upvote" (auto-correct changed it to uproot). Sorry if you were unable to decipher it.

    So, my question was, did you post your drivel twice, so that you could get more upvotes?



    Yes. I did it for a fucking upvote or whatever. There, I answered your question.

    Now give us your plan that would have prevented today besides "the NRA is bad"

    We are listening. Please be specific.

    Edit: all of the above. What legislation would you propose and what stronger background checks did NRA work to defeat that would have stopped today's shooting?
    Here you go smart guy:

    1. Make all laws federal/national, so that people can’t circumvent them by simply crossing state lines.

    2. Ban the NRA.

    3. Confiscate all privately owned guns (but still allow a well regulated militia as per the 2nd amendment). Go door to door to get them. Spare no one.. Bring in the UN if needed for the extra manpower. At the very least, we can probably allow the Canadian and Mexican police to volunteer to help. I"m sure they'd be happy to.

    4. Imprison anybody that interferes with 1, 2 & 3. (which includes Rush Limbaugh). Send them to camps to retrain them.

    5. Create a national, single payer, health care system that includes a national database of mental health issues for all US residents.

    6. Require people to obtain a license before they can have and raise kids. It is obviously way too hard for a significant portion of our population.

    If the above laws and actions had been enacted 25 years ago, that would have prevented today’s tragedy.






























    Now, am I in favor of this? no, but that isn’t what you asked.

    HTH

    (well, actually, I think #6 is a fucking great idea)
    Awesome. But I did ask what YOU would do?

    You have no practical answers. You just yap left MSNBC talikg points.

    You have nothing. Just move on.
    You asked what I'd propose that would have prevented today's events.

    I answered that. It would have prevented today's events. Though it may have also had other consequences.

    If, what you meant ask was, "what can we do in today's political climate in which the NRA and their shills prop up the 2nd amendment to thwart all reasonable attempts at making us safer from gun violence"... then that is the question you should have asked. Of course, the answer to that question is much more complicated.


  • DontCallMeShirley
    DontCallMeShirley Member Posts: 283
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    Yeah. Let's ban 4 chan. But god forbid, please keep it easy as fuck for the mentally ill to have access to guns. The NRA appreciates that.

    And now the shooter will be immortalized by the media and Wikipedia instead of dying a depressed nobody due to suicide.

    Fucking christ, really difficult issue. There's pretty much no way to prevent these type of events from happening either.

    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    WE GUN CONTROL

    Oh wait... Oregon has that. Fuck. Now what?
    You already said that. Were you hoping for more uproots the 2nd time around?
    What laws do you propose (that don't aleady exist) that would have prevented this. Please be specific.
    I'll take a crack at answering your question, after you answer mine, since I asked first.
    What was your question?
    Since you can't read, there is no point in me taking the time to write out a long answer to your question.
    Fucking cop out. You have no answers or a clue.

    I see some incoherent sentence about an uproot. Is that the question? I don't know what that means. But sure. I want an uproot. Now answer my question or just admit you have no fucking idea about this.
    That was "upvote" (auto-correct changed it to uproot). Sorry if you were unable to decipher it.

    So, my question was, did you post your drivel twice, so that you could get more upvotes?



    Yes. I did it for a fucking upvote or whatever. There, I answered your question.

    Now give us your plan that would have prevented today besides "the NRA is bad"

    We are listening. Please be specific.

    Edit: all of the above. What legislation would you propose and what stronger background checks did NRA work to defeat that would have stopped today's shooting?
    Here you go smart guy:

    1. Make all laws federal/national, so that people can’t circumvent them by simply crossing state lines.

    2. Ban the NRA.

    3. Confiscate all privately owned guns (but still allow a well regulated militia as per the 2nd amendment). Go door to door to get them. Spare no one.. Bring in the UN if needed for the extra manpower. At the very least, we can probably allow the Canadian and Mexican police to volunteer to help. I"m sure they'd be happy to.

    4. Imprison anybody that interferes with 1, 2 & 3. (which includes Rush Limbaugh). Send them to camps to retrain them.

    5. Create a national, single payer, health care system that includes a national database of mental health issues for all US residents.

    6. Require people to obtain a license before they can have and raise kids. It is obviously way too hard for a significant portion of our population.

    If the above laws and actions had been enacted 25 years ago, that would have prevented today’s tragedy.






























    Now, am I in favor of this? no, but that isn’t what you asked.

    HTH

    (well, actually, I think #6 is a fucking great idea)
    Awesome. But I did ask what YOU would do?

    You have no practical answers. You just yap left MSNBC talikg points.

    You have nothing. Just move on.
    You asked what I'd propose that would have prevented today's events.

    I answered that. It would have prevented today's events. Though it may have also had other consequences.

    If, what you meant ask was, "what can we do in today's political climate in which the NRA and their shills prop up the 2nd amendment to thwart all reasonable attempts at making us safer from gun violence"... then that is the question you should have asked. Of course, the answer to that question is much more complicated.


    You answered nothing. You gave bunch if totalitarian points then said you aren't in favor of them. You have nothing.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    fuck this got out of control quickly.

  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    Yeah. Let's ban 4 chan. But god forbid, please keep it easy as fuck for the mentally ill to have access to guns. The NRA appreciates that.

    And now the shooter will be immortalized by the media and Wikipedia instead of dying a depressed nobody due to suicide.

    Fucking christ, really difficult issue. There's pretty much no way to prevent these type of events from happening either.

    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    WE GUN CONTROL

    Oh wait... Oregon has that. Fuck. Now what?
    You already said that. Were you hoping for more uproots the 2nd time around?
    What laws do you propose (that don't aleady exist) that would have prevented this. Please be specific.
    I'll take a crack at answering your question, after you answer mine, since I asked first.
    What was your question?
    Since you can't read, there is no point in me taking the time to write out a long answer to your question.
    Fucking cop out. You have no answers or a clue.

    I see some incoherent sentence about an uproot. Is that the question? I don't know what that means. But sure. I want an uproot. Now answer my question or just admit you have no fucking idea about this.
    That was "upvote" (auto-correct changed it to uproot). Sorry if you were unable to decipher it.

    So, my question was, did you post your drivel twice, so that you could get more upvotes?



    Yes. I did it for a fucking upvote or whatever. There, I answered your question.

    Now give us your plan that would have prevented today besides "the NRA is bad"

    We are listening. Please be specific.

    Edit: all of the above. What legislation would you propose and what stronger background checks did NRA work to defeat that would have stopped today's shooting?
    Here you go smart guy:

    1. Make all laws federal/national, so that people can’t circumvent them by simply crossing state lines.

    2. Ban the NRA.

    3. Confiscate all privately owned guns (but still allow a well regulated militia as per the 2nd amendment). Go door to door to get them. Spare no one.. Bring in the UN if needed for the extra manpower. At the very least, we can probably allow the Canadian and Mexican police to volunteer to help. I"m sure they'd be happy to.

    4. Imprison anybody that interferes with 1, 2 & 3. (which includes Rush Limbaugh). Send them to camps to retrain them.

    5. Create a national, single payer, health care system that includes a national database of mental health issues for all US residents.

    6. Require people to obtain a license before they can have and raise kids. It is obviously way too hard for a significant portion of our population.

    If the above laws and actions had been enacted 25 years ago, that would have prevented today’s tragedy.






























    Now, am I in favor of this? no, but that isn’t what you asked.

    HTH

    (well, actually, I think #6 is a fucking great idea)
    Awesome. But I did ask what YOU would do?

    You have no practical answers. You just yap left MSNBC talikg points.

    You have nothing. Just move on.
    You asked what I'd propose that would have prevented today's events.

    I answered that. It would have prevented today's events. Though it may have also had other consequences.

    If, what you meant ask was, "what can we do in today's political climate in which the NRA and their shills prop up the 2nd amendment to thwart all reasonable attempts at making us safer from gun violence"... then that is the question you should have asked. Of course, the answer to that question is much more complicated.


    You answered nothing. You gave bunch if totalitarian points then said you aren't in favor of them. You have nothing.
    I answered the question related to today's tragedy. Which was what you asked.

    I'm not in favor of ALL of them, for reasons unrelated to today's tragedy.

    Are you capable of comprehending the difference?

    You've already admitted that your post was just an attempt to get upvotes, so whats the difference to you?
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    @OZONE entered @IMALOSER_ territory

    I don't know him. Is that a bad thing?

    Look, a bunch of fucktards tried to turn today's tragedy into a political statement.

    I then added to the thread, but took the opposite political stance of the others that were already trying to use it for political gain. .

    And now all you fucking nancy's are shaking and vomiting in outrage that I'm using it for political gain.

    Rich.

    I'm sure some will understand the rhetoric. Many won't. I'm sure OBK and his new handle of Don'tCallMeShirly won't.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    edited October 2015

    2001400ex said:

    Jesus Christ - I know shit wasn't that rosy in the day, but I really don't recall the mass shooting shit being nearly as frequent as it is now.

    WTF.

    You sir have succumbed to the 24 hours news hype machine.
    I don't know. 10 people picked off at a JC within 500 miles of here makes news in my little world.
    What difference does it make if it was 500, 1000, or 3000 miles from you. It not like you were there or even could have been there.
    fuck, I don't know. because I feel like it makes a difference? PNW and all that? how 'bout that?

    #dumbquestionsfor$500Alex

  • DontCallMeShirley
    DontCallMeShirley Member Posts: 283
    edited October 2015
    OZONE said:

    @OZONE entered @IMALOSER_ territory

    I don't know him. Is that a bad thing?

    Look, a bunch of fucktards tried to turn today's tragedy into a political statement.

    I then added to the thread, but took the opposite political stance of the others that were already trying to use it for political gain. .

    And now all you fucking nancy's are shaking and vomiting in outrage that I'm using it for political gain.

    Rich.

    I'm sure some will understand the rhetoric. Many won't. I'm sure OBK and his new handle of Don'tCallMeShirly won't.
    Now that we know you're a partisan hack who yaps about the NRA and other billshit non starters, we can ignore your dumbass and the noise you create. You didn't answer the question and still have zero answers.

    Rich
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282

    2001400ex said:

    Jesus Christ - I know shit wasn't that rosy in the day, but I really don't recall the mass shooting shit being nearly as frequent as it is now.

    WTF.

    You sir have succumbed to the 24 hours news hype machine.
    I don't know. 10 people picked off at a JC within 500 miles of here makes news in my little world.
    What difference does it make if it was 500, 1000, or 3000 miles from you. It not like you were there or even could have been there.
    fuck, I don't know. because I feel like it makes a difference? PNW and all that? how 'bout that?

    #dumbquestionsfor$500Alex
    The local connection? Christ.
    maybe I'm missing something basic here. certainly wouldn't be the first time, so don't get all puffed up in your pants if that's the case. i've been torched by better men.

    someone, I thought, was making the point that I was overreacting because news is immediate and recurring and hyperbolized today. my response was, well, something shitty happened in my general neck of the woods = news to me.

    it does not follow from that statement, by any application of logical reasoning, that it's less important if it happens 1,000 or 3,000 miles away.

    whatever. at any rate, with my second reply in place, we've now gone beyond the tight confines of my attention span boundaries. sorry.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:



    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    Yeah. Let's ban 4 chan. But god forbid, please keep it easy as fuck for the mentally ill to have access to guns. The NRA appreciates that.

    And now the shooter will be immortalized by the media and Wikipedia instead of dying a depressed nobody due to suicide.

    Fucking christ, really difficult issue. There's pretty much no way to prevent these type of events from happening either.

    And fuck 4chan. Just take that place off the internet already. And yes I support free speech and Internet anonymity and yadda yadda. But fuck 4chan

    WE GUN CONTROL

    Oh wait... Oregon has that. Fuck. Now what?
    You already said that. Were you hoping for more uproots the 2nd time around?
    What laws do you propose (that don't aleady exist) that would have prevented this. Please be specific.
    I'll take a crack at answering your question, after you answer mine, since I asked first.
    What was your question?
    Since you can't read, there is no point in me taking the time to write out a long answer to your question.
    Fucking cop out. You have no answers or a clue.

    I see some incoherent sentence about an uproot. Is that the question? I don't know what that means. But sure. I want an uproot. Now answer my question or just admit you have no fucking idea about this.
    That was "upvote" (auto-correct changed it to uproot). Sorry if you were unable to decipher it.

    So, my question was, did you post your drivel twice, so that you could get more upvotes?



    Yes. I did it for a fucking upvote or whatever. There, I answered your question.

    Now give us your plan that would have prevented today besides "the NRA is bad"

    We are listening. Please be specific.

    Edit: all of the above. What legislation would you propose and what stronger background checks did NRA work to defeat that would have stopped today's shooting?
    Here you go smart guy:

    1. Make all laws federal/national, so that people can’t circumvent them by simply crossing state lines.

    2. Ban the NRA.

    3. Confiscate all privately owned guns (but still allow a well regulated militia as per the 2nd amendment). Go door to door to get them. Spare no one.. Bring in the UN if needed for the extra manpower. At the very least, we can probably allow the Canadian and Mexican police to volunteer to help. I"m sure they'd be happy to.

    4. Imprison anybody that interferes with 1, 2 & 3. (which includes Rush Limbaugh). Send them to camps to retrain them.

    5. Create a national, single payer, health care system that includes a national database of mental health issues for all US residents.

    6. Require people to obtain a license before they can have and raise kids. It is obviously way too hard for a significant portion of our population.

    If the above laws and actions had been enacted 25 years ago, that would have prevented today’s tragedy.






























    Now, am I in favor of this? no, but that isn’t what you asked.

    HTH

    (well, actually, I think #6 is a fucking great idea)
    Awesome. But I did ask what YOU would do?

    You have no practical answers. You just yap left MSNBC talikg points.

    You have nothing. Just move on.
    You asked what I'd propose that would have prevented today's events.

    I answered that. It would have prevented today's events. Though it may have also had other consequences.

    If, what you meant ask was, "what can we do in today's political climate in which the NRA and their shills prop up the 2nd amendment to thwart all reasonable attempts at making us safer from gun violence"... then that is the question you should have asked. Of course, the answer to that question is much more complicated.


    Bullshit. Your gun law fantasy doesn't work in Chicago.

    I actually relish the thought of the UN trying to go door to door in the US for any reason