Dwayne Washington
Comments
-
And that is why we(?) are 2-2.
-
-
-
You clearly aren't smart enough to win a medal. Look to the right.topdawgnc said: -
-
I thought this thread was going to be about taint licking.
-
#MyChico
-
It's not?PurpleBaze said:I thought this thread was going to be about taint licking.
-
He is a great player that is rarely used correctly against teams with a pulse.
His line and WR's also suck at blocking -
that space is saved for you2001400ex said: -
HurtfulRaceBannon said: -
Back to the original topic. I like Washington and I'll give him props. As the o-line develops, Washington will be more successful. He has the size, strength and speed. Just needs some holes. I'll even credit Smith for recognizing he's one of better tools on offense and finding a way to get him the ball. That said, after a great drive where he fucking marched us down the entire field for a TD, Smith goes away from him.
I mean, look at this fucking guy. Show me a RB we've had built like that who is also fast. Let's find a way to open some holes and give him the fucking rock and continue with the screens as well.
This picture is good news for our strength program but not good news for Boner Popper because clearly he's not tucked it away well.
Pic of him less than a year ago:
-
FUCK!! is all I can say about that fumble. The defender swatted at it with one hand and the fucking ball shot out 5 yards.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Back to the original topic. I like Washington and I'll give him props. As the o-line develops, Washington will be more successful. He has the size, strength and speed. Just needs some holes. I'll even credit Smith for recognizing he's one of better tools on offense and finding a way to get him the ball. That said, after a great drive where he fucking marched us down the entire field for a TD, Smith goes away from him.
I mean, look at this fucking guy. Show me a RB we've had built like that who is also fast. Let's find a way to open some holes and give him the fucking rock and continue with the screens as well.
This picture is good news for our strength program but not good news for Boner Popper because clearly he's not tucked it away well. -
Dwarsh runs hard sometimes.
When he runs hard, he can do pretty well in a straight line. Unless the sun is in his eyes or he fumbles.
But, when the sun's not in his eyes and he's not fumbling and he's running hard (which is about a third of the time) through an open hole where he didn't have to deviate from his preset course, he's pretty fucking good. -
Two gifs of DWarsh running:
-
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
-
The point wasn't to crown him. It was merely stating a fact that he has been the best playmaker on the team.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
-
It looked like he kicked the ball as it fell out of his grip.PurpleBaze said:
FUCK!! is all I can say about that fumble. The defender swatted at it with one hand and the fucking ball shot out 5 yards.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Back to the original topic. I like Washington and I'll give him props. As the o-line develops, Washington will be more successful. He has the size, strength and speed. Just needs some holes. I'll even credit Smith for recognizing he's one of better tools on offense and finding a way to get him the ball. That said, after a great drive where he fucking marched us down the entire field for a TD, Smith goes away from him.
I mean, look at this fucking guy. Show me a RB we've had built like that who is also fast. Let's find a way to open some holes and give him the fucking rock and continue with the screens as well.
This picture is good news for our strength program but not good news for Boner Popper because clearly he's not tucked it away well.
I'm surprised anyone is surprised that DWarsh fumbled here considering his well-documented fumbling problems. -
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have. -
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy. -
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy. -
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy. -
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy. -
Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.ThomasFremont said:
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
-
I was worried nobody would get that.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.ThomasFremont said:
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Awesome! -
I'm pretty much as white as it gets, but TLC was one of my earliest NTD, BB adventures. Crazy sexy cool for the win.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.ThomasFremont said:
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy. -
The crackers on this bored have severely underawesome'd this poast.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.ThomasFremont said:
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
YVBE -
I know Babushka's gonna have it his way or nothing at all.ThomasFremont said:
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Sometime's DWarsh gets moving too fast. -
LOLdnc said:
I know Babushka's gonna have it his way or nothing at all.ThomasFremont said:
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.GrundleStiltzkin said:
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.ThomasFremont said:
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.TTJ said:
This.dnc said:
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.Baseman said:Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Sometime's DWarsh gets moving too fast. -
Andre Rison's mansion weeps at this thread.
