Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dwayne Washington

13

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    TTJ said:

    dnc said:

    Baseman said:

    Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold

    I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.

    Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
    This.

    Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
    Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    TTJ said:

    dnc said:

    Baseman said:

    Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold

    I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.

    Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
    This.

    Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
    Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
    DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
    Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    TTJ said:

    dnc said:

    Baseman said:

    Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold

    I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.

    Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
    This.

    Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
    Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
    DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
    Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
    Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.
    image
    I was worried nobody would get that.

    Awesome!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    TTJ said:

    dnc said:

    Baseman said:

    Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold

    I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.

    Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
    This.

    Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
    Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
    DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
    Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
    Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.
    image
    The crackers on this bored have severely underawesome'd this poast.

    YVBE
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,365 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    TTJ said:

    dnc said:

    Baseman said:

    Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold

    I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.

    Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
    This.

    Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
    Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
    DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
    Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
    I know Babushka's gonna have it his way or nothing at all.

    Sometime's DWarsh gets moving too fast.
    LOL
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter