Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.
I'm pretty much as white as it gets, but TLC was one of my earliest NTD, BB adventures. Crazy sexy cool for the win.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
Now Left Eye, there was a smash your face in OC.
The crackers on this bored have severely underawesome'd this poast.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
I know Babushka's gonna have it his way or nothing at all.
Doogs! Two weeks ago Dwarsh was horse shit, now you're crowning him....#revisonist #Griswold
I've been a posi DWash from the start. I was the one telling everyone to quit NTD, BB'ing over Gaskin after the Ballsack (lol!) State game.
Washington is a lot like WASHINGTON, dammit. Very good at times, very flawed at others, and yet the best we have.
This.
Been saying the same thing since last year: DWarsh is flawed but good. A major asset. Would thrive behind a decent line, in tandem with a strong second back of contrasting style. Time will tell if Gaskin can be that guy.
Maybe he'd thrive if we (WE???) actually ran the fucking football.
DWarsh is not a natural tailback, not to mention his well-documented fumbling problems.
Good point. Just stick to the WR screens and jet sweeps that we're used to.
I know Babushka's gonna have it his way or nothing at all.
Comments
Awesome!
YVBE
Sometime's DWarsh gets moving too fast.