My Biggest Petersen Concern
I thought we were hiring a guy that
would make that subtle positive difference
that turns a 50-50 game into a positive
result. I have him at 0 for 5 now in either
way games. UA, ASU, and Stanford last year.
Boise and Cal this year. That is not a closer
in my eyes. Gotta wonder if he has lost some
of his chops.
Comments
-
UW WP %
Sark 55%
Peterman 55%
-
This entire program is a mess from the top to the bottom. Woody has done nothing to change the expectations and thus, 15 years later, we are not worth the effort hard core fans put forth. Sadly for DJ, I have to say that I'm done with spending money for a long time on the Dogs, and it will impact some people like him. Sorry dude.
-
God maybe I was spoiled by watching
Boise beat Oklahoma in that bowl game,
but he gave me the distinct impression of a coach
who could pull something out of his ass to win a
close game. Now all I see is a deer in the headlights
afraid to lose type of attitude. Coaching scared
in my view. -
Hated the hire before we saw 15 games of this dreck offensive strategy.
Wish I... we were all wrong.
-
The most concerning is that glaring turd burger called the offense. This is Peterman's team, and that is his supposed expertise, but he has @TheGlove coaching his QB's and coordinating his offense. I see improvement in other areas, but he needs to go if he doesn't get the offense fixed.
-
100% with you. Who kidnappedSoutherndawg said:The most concerning is that glaring turd burger called the offense. This is Peterman's team, and that is his supposed expertise, but he has @TheGlove coaching his QB's and coordinating his offense. I see improvement in other areas, but he needs to go if he doesn't get the offense fixed.
the Boise St. Petersen? He joined the
Pac 12 and instantly became a puckered
up version of himself. Fuck, bring back
some of that creativity we were all expecting
when UW made the hire. -
15 games is the standard by which people know if the coach is the guy or not
not looking good -
Michigan, Stanford and the 49ers agreeGladstone said:15 games is the standard by which people know if the coach is the guy or not
not looking good -
At Boise he was in a total of about 4 or 5 50/50 games. If you thought you were getting a coach that could push a team over the top to get a win other coaches wouldn't. You didn't. Ts and Ps though.whuggy said:Not getting it done in crunch time.
I thought we were hiring a guy that
would make that subtle positive difference
that turns a 50-50 game into a positive
result. I have him at 0 for 5 now in either
way games. UA, ASU, and Stanford last year.
Boise and Cal this year. That is not a closer
in my eyes. Gotta wonder if he has lost some
of his chops. -
once a generation coachNeGgaPlEaSe said:
Michigan, Stanford and the 49ers agreeGladstone said:15 games is the standard by which people know if the coach is the guy or not
not looking good
also Stanford knocked off #1 USC as a 41 pt underdog year 1
they by year 2 could run the ball and had an identity as a physical, borderline dirty team
keep saying Petersen is harbaugh though -
You know Coog you might just be right.salemcoog said:
At Boise he was in a total of about 4 or 5 50/50 games. If you thought you were getting a coach that could push a team over the top to get a win other coaches wouldn't. You didn't. Ts and Ps though.whuggy said:Not getting it done in crunch time.
I thought we were hiring a guy that
would make that subtle positive difference
that turns a 50-50 game into a positive
result. I have him at 0 for 5 now in either
way games. UA, ASU, and Stanford last year.
Boise and Cal this year. That is not a closer
in my eyes. Gotta wonder if he has lost some
of his chops.
Did a little research of Petersen against
comparable or better opponents.
2006-W-Oklahoma
2007-L-East Carolina L-Washington L-Hawaii
2008-W-Oregon L-TCU
2009-W-Oregon W-TCU
2010-W-Va Tech L-Nevada W-Utah
2011-W-Georgia L-TCU W-ASU
2012-L-Mich. St. W-Wash.
2013-L-Wash. L-Fresno St. L-Oregon St.
Pretty quick looking up the facts and I
don't guarantee accuracy but nothing special
about those results. We might have just gone and
hired ourselves a .500 coach. -
As a Power 5 coach.... he sucks.
He'll get more time but that doesn't refute what has been shown thus far.
Me - Di - Ocre -
MisterEm said:
As a Power 5 coach.... he sucks.
He'll get more time but that doesn't refute what has been shown thus far.
Me - Di - Ocre
-
It's extremely annoying he is letting this guy learn on the job. The PAC12 should not be your first stop as an OC.
-
It's not his first stop as an OC.PurpleReign said:It's extremely annoying he is letting this guy learn on the job. The PAC12 should not be your first stop as an OC.
-
PurpleReign said:
It's so fucking irritating he is letting this guy learn on the job. The PAC12 should not be your first stop as an OC.
-
Ok stop! You don't realize the damage you're doing to recruiting. Recruits read our boreds ....many out here can never be happy, most like to bitch, others not so much .....step away fro the keyboard for a while, take a walk, take a dump, pour a glass of wine. We don't want to give you a timeout".....but we will
Wine of the week:April 2015 strawberry Boones farm. Aroma of piss tickles the nose, with a smooth lingering scope finish. My new favorite -
Peterman went 92-12.
Got there by walking into a program that has massive support and was already established.
I think we just need to calm down and realize we have to give Peterman the same patience that VA Tech gave Frank Beamer.
A seven year plan to win the Independence Bowl is something we can all be proud of.
