USC Best Offense; UW Best Defense in PAC12 so far

Comments

• 79smoothdawg Member Posts: 721

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  RaceBannon said:

  MisterEm said:

  CAL had two spies on the Tejas QB.

  Bad angles

  They weren't bad angles. You still can't read. It was the QBs speed that gave him the ability to beat angles.
  
  Dumbf***

  Reading that, I surmise that they took bad angles.
  

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,479

  September 2015

  Speed is directly related to angles.
  
  

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 79smoothdawg Member Posts: 721

  September 2015

  If the QB is fast, you have to adjust.

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  RaceBannon said:

  MisterEm said:

  CAL had two spies on the Tejas QB.

  Bad angles

  They weren't bad angles. You still can't read. It was the QBs speed that gave him the ability to beat angles.
  
  Dumbf***

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vqb9uC31Bk#t=1m11s

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

  September 2015

  Flagged for thinking UW and USC have played teams that are worth a shit.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• FrankBear21 Member Posts: 31

  September 2015

  Suck me. 50-20 cal
  
  #Drop50

  -2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 79smoothdawg Member Posts: 721

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  Suck me. 50-20 cal
  
  #Drop50

  
  If they are going to drop fifty I hope they figured this out.
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

  September 2015 edited September 2015

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  Flagged for thinking UW and USC have played teams that are worth a shit.

  See Boobs, I don't think you get the analytics thing yet. Nobody is "thinking" anything. This is not some Doog/Trooj saying "UW and SC are good because..." These are cold, emotionless numbers saying, "of all the plays that have happened this year, these teams are the best when the formulas are applied." Everybody in the country has played dreck to this point. SC's offense and UW's defense happen to have been the most effective against dreck when you run the numbers. HTH.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  Suck me. 50-20 cal
  
  #Drop50

  

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

  September 2015

  WilburHooksHands said:

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  Flagged for thinking UW and USC have played teams that are worth a shit.

  See Boobs, I don't think you get the analytics thing yet. Nobody is "thinking" anything. This is not some Doog/Trooj saying "UW and SC are good because..." These are cold, emotionless numbers saying, "of all the plays that have happened this year, these teams are the best when the formulas are applied." Everybody in the country has played dreck to this point. SC's offense and UW's defense happen to have been the most effective against dreck when you run the numbers. HTH.

  I get the analytics thing.
  
  I get that the analytics doesn't work when you are playing dreck and the sample sizes are very small.
  
  LIPO.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,479

  September 2015

  @FrankBear21
  
  

  10 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

  September 2015

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  WilburHooksHands said:

  TierbsHsotBoobs said:

  Flagged for thinking UW and USC have played teams that are worth a shit.

  See Boobs, I don't think you get the analytics thing yet. Nobody is "thinking" anything. This is not some Doog/Trooj saying "UW and SC are good because..." These are cold, emotionless numbers saying, "of all the plays that have happened this year, these teams are the best when the formulas are applied." Everybody in the country has played dreck to this point. SC's offense and UW's defense happen to have been the most effective against dreck when you run the numbers. HTH.

  I get the analytics thing.
  
  I get that the analytics doesn't work when you are playing dreck and the sample sizes are very small.
  
  LIPO.

  That's a fair enough response.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• SpoogeDawg Member Posts: 379

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  Suck me. 50-20 cal
  
  #Drop50

  Please motherfucker

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleReign Member Posts: 5,479

  September 2015

  We have to go down to Tejas and win before we can pop off.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• FrankBear21 Member Posts: 31

  September 2015

  PurpleReign said:

  We have to go down to Tejas and win before we can pop off.

  No. Just Boise St with a coach who knows all their players.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,347

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  RaceBannon said:

  MisterEm said:

  CAL had two spies on the Tejas QB.

  Bad angles

  They weren't bad angles. You still can't read. It was the QBs speed that gave him the ability to beat angles.
  
  Dumbf***

  *dumbfuck

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  September 2015

  I care about one defensive stat: How many points did we give up?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

  September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  PurpleReign said:

  We have to go down to Tejas and win before we can pop off.

  No. Just Boise St with a coach who knows all their players.

  Sounds like you care.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  September 2015 edited September 2015

  FrankBear21 said:

  Suck me. 50-20 cal
  
  #Drop50

  Theirs no way Cal drops 50 this week.
  
  More like 17.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

  September 2015

  PurpleJ said:

  FrankBear21 said:

  Suck me. 50-20 cal
  
  #Drop50

  Theirs no way Cal drops 50 this week.

  (as long as DJ doesn't start the game thread)

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter