Kam's couch back in living room
TSISO
Comments
-
Just in time for the mighty bears. Thank Allah
-
Link?
-
Can't post a link when he saw it on KOMO passing by buttfuck.
-
I like to call him Skam Chancellor
El Oh El -
Actually The Score App ... KOMO is so 1999RaceBannon said:Can't post a link when he saw it on KOMO passing by buttfuck.
-
If we are going to bash Dr. Laura following the Husky football games then I am out.topdawgnc said:
Actually The Score App ... KOMO is so 1999RaceBannon said:Can't post a link when he saw it on KOMO passing by buttfuck.
-
That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
-
Can't expect to beat the Bears without Kam.
-
The defense is absolutely a problem.SteveInShelton said:That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other
-
I like how everyone is shocked that the running game looks worse than expected even though they lost 2 interior lineman, traded for a non blocking tight end and Lynch is a year older.
-
Agreed. 2 months to prepare for not having Kam also.SteveInShelton said:That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
-
You have a point there, the Rams game was a dreckfest. However, giving up 24 (not counting the last FG after the stupid INT late in the game) to the Packers on the road is good.dhdawg said:
The defense is absolutely a problem.SteveInShelton said:That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other -
For the average team, 24 wasn't bad. For the Seahawks it sucks.SteveInShelton said:
You have a point there, the Rams game was a dreckfest. However, giving up 24 (not counting the last FG after the stupid INT late in the game) to the Packers on the road is good.dhdawg said:
The defense is absolutely a problem.SteveInShelton said:That's all fine and good but their problem isn't strong safety, it's the offense. They have to figure out how to play with an even worse offensive line than last year and a possibly declining Lynch. Also, they had all off season to scheme Graham into the offense and it seems so far they have no idea how to do that.
34 points against the rams..I know it's Rodgers but they gave up the game winning drive in that one as well.
It's abundance. Doesn't have to be one or the other -
-
His couch may be back but it's missing a whole lotta change from between the cushions.
-
I would be the Hawks are making nice with him ... bet this was a net net for him.sarktastic said:His couch may be back but it's missing a whole lotta change from between the cushions.
-
Russell may have to learn how to execute the play as it is designed. That would help graham and everyone else.
