KG and Fatters on Browning
Comments
-
That I don't charge you $10.95/month is but yet another blessing from Pat Haden, holy be His name.insinceredawg said:Both guyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyys from dawgman dot com are trying to save face by saying Browning is a different player from who they saw in fall camp. They are still standing by their opinion that Lindy was the clear frontrunner and Browning must have pulled away during the closed practices. That goes against what my source told me in that Browning was the top QB after the first couple practices and continued to distance himself throughout camp. But my sources don't charge $10.95/month so they must not know anything.
-
Some serious revisionist history right here.Tequilla said:It was obvious in the Spring Browning was the guy ... anybody that couldn't see it was either @GrandpaSankey or didn't know shit about sports.
-
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Anytime they try to backpedal on Browning someone should post this on dm.c:
http://www.scout.com/college/washington/story/1565058-dawgman-com-daily-check-in-7-20
"All but cements in stone that Browning will redshirt"
Nice hatchet job. Kim's words were twisted against him. Everything was taken out of context.
-
Do I need to go back to the Spring and provide the post where I said that Browning was the guy?TTJ said:
Some serious revisionist history right here.Tequilla said:It was obvious in the Spring Browning was the guy ... anybody that couldn't see it was either @GrandpaSankey or didn't know shit about sports.
-
Browning looked like the best QB in Spring. Only reason I thought it might be someone else at QB to start was to ease him in and start him around the 3rd game. I still had no idea why they thought he wouldn't play this year, let alone why they thought he would redshirt.
It's especially true because they saw him WAY more than anyone else did since they could go to every spring and fall practice. -
You are assuming they have an ounce of legit football knowledge ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Browning looked like the best QB in Spring. Only reason I thought it might be someone else at QB to start was to ease him in and start him around the 3rd game. I still had no idea why they thought he wouldn't play this year, let alone why they thought he would redshirt.
It's especially true because they saw him WAY more than anyone else did since they could go to every spring and fall practice.
You know better than that -
It was obvious to me in December, but i'm just here to beat my chest.
-
I laughed at the fact that you posted this.TTJ said:
Some serious revisionist history right here.Tequilla said:It was obvious in the Spring Browning was the guy ... anybody that couldn't see it was either @GrandpaSankey or didn't know shit about sports.
-
Fire Elise Again.Hippopeteamus said:
Here is Elise's interview of him. He answers her questions in a similar fashion:SpoogeDawg said:During the interview I watched from the ST's after the game when a couple fuckos were asking Jake questions Kim was so trying to weasel his way into his good graces with his TBS man crush gay fucking love NTTIATWWT type questions like he does will guys like Will Conroy and the other handful of guys he thinks he's "boys" with.
Kim needs to get nuked from UW, he makes my skin crawl because he was shitting on Jake for not going to a camp and is now on FULL Backpedal Mode wanting to slurp any success the Pete guys achieve while deep down pining for Sark and is soft minded players like LOZ.
Fuck
My favorite part: Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah -
Kim and @Tequilla are the only two people left that think Lockner was a good quarterback.CuntWaffle said:I love that video of Kim. Looks so disheveled like he is just coming out of a 48 hour bender. He had to make sure to show off his Jack Lockner signed jersey too.
