Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

new Sagarin rankings are out... lol

sarktastic
sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
edited September 2015 in College Football Forum
Composite of all teams. (pre-flagged for posting a fucked-up meaningless nerd model)

It appears we compete in the Pac-7 conference.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Muttzen said:

    Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?

    I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,808 Founders Club
    BallSacked said:

    Muttzen said:

    Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?

    I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.
    The talent at SC is ridiculous. I'm going to need your Broons to choke to Sark this season. That program needs at least one more year of his damage. It would really suck to see a double canning of Sark and Haden and have some competent asshole come in and make a good hire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sagarin keeps prior year data in the model at a decreasing rate until around week 6. That's why under the BCS model with computers, they wouldn't announce rankings until that point.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Doogles said:

    BallSacked said:

    Muttzen said:

    Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?

    I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.
    The talent at SC is ridiculous. I'm going to need your Broons to choke to Sark this season. That program needs at least one more year of his damage. It would really suck to see a double canning of Sark and Haden and have some competent asshole come in and make a good hire.
    My guess right now is SC is 8-3 entering that game and UCLA is 9-2. Winner takes the loaded south.

    8-4 with a loss to UCLA and Sark could be done, or fired at any moment in 2016.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,808 Founders Club
    BallSacked said:

    Doogles said:

    BallSacked said:

    Muttzen said:

    Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?

    I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.
    The talent at SC is ridiculous. I'm going to need your Broons to choke to Sark this season. That program needs at least one more year of his damage. It would really suck to see a double canning of Sark and Haden and have some competent asshole come in and make a good hire.
    My guess right now is SC is 8-3 entering that game and UCLA is 9-2. Winner takes the loaded south.

    8-4 with a loss to UCLA and Sark could be done, or fired at any moment in 2016.
    A lot riding on the ASU game for SC. A potential 4 game skid awaits with a loss there, especially if UW handles Cal. A confident two weeks prepped Petersen Husky team beats a Sark team with the wheels falling off.

    A victory straightens the ship, they probably beat UW like they should, and then have confidence going into a game against an overrated ND they crushed last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    dnc said:

    In defense of Sagarin ratings, they aren't designed to mean shit after 3 games. Objective measures require data, and with most everyone having beaten up on a couple cupcakes there's just nowhere near enough relevant data to matter at this point. Computer rankings don't matter until early November.







    All that said, Southern Cal is still TOO HIGH!

    so... when we see more data... Where will Colorado, Washington State and Oregon State end up do you suppose?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,765 Founders Club
    So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.

    So we have that going for us which is nice
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter