new Sagarin rankings are out... lol

It appears we compete in the Pac-7 conference.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
Comments
-
Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
-
In defense of Sagarin ratings, they aren't designed to mean shit after 3 games. Objective measures require data, and with most everyone having beaten up on a couple cupcakes there's just nowhere near enough relevant data to matter at this point. Computer rankings don't matter until early November.
All that said, Southern Cal is still TOO HIGH! -
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
-
The talent at SC is ridiculous. I'm going to need your Broons to choke to Sark this season. That program needs at least one more year of his damage. It would really suck to see a double canning of Sark and Haden and have some competent asshole come in and make a good hire.BallSacked said:
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
-
Sagarin keeps prior year data in the model at a decreasing rate until around week 6. That's why under the BCS model with computers, they wouldn't announce rankings until that point.
-
My guess right now is SC is 8-3 entering that game and UCLA is 9-2. Winner takes the loaded south.Doogles said:
The talent at SC is ridiculous. I'm going to need your Broons to choke to Sark this season. That program needs at least one more year of his damage. It would really suck to see a double canning of Sark and Haden and have some competent asshole come in and make a good hire.BallSacked said:
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
8-4 with a loss to UCLA and Sark could be done, or fired at any moment in 2016.
-
A lot riding on the ASU game for SC. A potential 4 game skid awaits with a loss there, especially if UW handles Cal. A confident two weeks prepped Petersen Husky team beats a Sark team with the wheels falling off.BallSacked said:
My guess right now is SC is 8-3 entering that game and UCLA is 9-2. Winner takes the loaded south.Doogles said:
The talent at SC is ridiculous. I'm going to need your Broons to choke to Sark this season. That program needs at least one more year of his damage. It would really suck to see a double canning of Sark and Haden and have some competent asshole come in and make a good hire.BallSacked said:
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
8-4 with a loss to UCLA and Sark could be done, or fired at any moment in 2016.
A victory straightens the ship, they probably beat UW like they should, and then have confidence going into a game against an overrated ND they crushed last year. -
so... when we see more data... Where will Colorado, Washington State and Oregon State end up do you suppose?dnc said:In defense of Sagarin ratings, they aren't designed to mean shit after 3 games. Objective measures require data, and with most everyone having beaten up on a couple cupcakes there's just nowhere near enough relevant data to matter at this point. Computer rankings don't matter until early November.
All that said, Southern Cal is still TOO HIGH! -
In the Big Skysarktastic said:
so... when we see more data... Where will Colorado, Washington State and Oregon State end up do you suppose?dnc said:In defense of Sagarin ratings, they aren't designed to mean shit after 3 games. Objective measures require data, and with most everyone having beaten up on a couple cupcakes there's just nowhere near enough relevant data to matter at this point. Computer rankings don't matter until early November.
All that said, Southern Cal is still TOO HIGH!
-
So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice -
We were both 5-1 when we played each other in Eugene last yearRaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice -
Really? We were 5-1?whatshouldicareabout said:
We were both 5-1 when we played each other in Eugene last yearRaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice -
Hawaii, Eastern, Illinois, Georgia State and Cal. One loss was Stanford with Peterman's fake punt.RaceBannon said:
Really? We were 5-1?whatshouldicareabout said:
We were both 5-1 when we played each other in Eugene last yearRaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice
Oregon beat South Dakota, Michigan State, Wyoming, Wazzu and UCLA. One loss was to Arizona. -
It's good to have a minion again
-
In the off season we were always undefeated going into the Oregon game with Sark
-
Race so quickly forgets 2000RaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice -
That I did not forget. Oregon gave us our first loss. I was there at unremodeled Autzen ArenaTequilla said:
Race so quickly forgets 2000RaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice -
(race forgets alot of things. most of us just smile and nod)
-
UW was 0-1 at that point last year.whatshouldicareabout said:
We were both 5-1 when we played each other in Eugene last yearRaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice
The five scrimmages don't count. -
Sagarin does, SRS does not. The maximum for blowouts in SRS is 24 or 28 points.BallSacked said:
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
-
How do you know stuff like this?HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Sagarin does, SRS does not. The maximum for blowouts in SRS is 24 or 28 points.BallSacked said:
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
Did you invent SRS? -
SRS Superiority Guy doesn't even know how SRS works?HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Sagarin does, SRS does not. The maximum for blowouts in SRS is 24 or 28 points.BallSacked said:
I've always suspected Sagarin and SRS overvalue blowouts in scrimmages. Probably the case here, only other explanation is TBS rankings are an input.Muttzen said:Wtf, USC still at 6? Does Yogi Roth run this model?
-
Did you get raped?RaceBanno said:
That I did not forget. Oregon gave us our first loss. I was there at unremodeled Autzen ArenaTequilla said:
Race so quickly forgets 2000RaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice -
Swaye said:
Did you get raped?RaceBanno said:
That I did not forget. Oregon gave us our first loss. I was there at unremodeled Autzen ArenaTequilla said:
Race so quickly forgets 2000RaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice
Kidnapped. The Stockholm Syndrome runs strong in that one. -
It was impliedSwaye said:
Did you get raped?RaceBanno said:
That I did not forget. Oregon gave us our first loss. I was there at unremodeled Autzen ArenaTequilla said:
Race so quickly forgets 2000RaceBannon said:So UW and OU are both 2-1. Might be the latest in the year we've been tied since 1999.
So we have that going for us which is nice