So we know Saudi Arabia is backing the Islamic State, and are pretty sure

...that they were the PRIMARY backers of the 9/11 terrorists...
...tell me again with Iran is our big fucking concern?
Comments
-
I know you're being sarcastic but Iran referred Jonathan Smith to Chris Peterman.
-
nukes are waaaaaaaaay overrated.
War is kool when there's a level playing field. -
Did you hear the Eagles released Tebow?
-
did it level the playing feeeld?
-
You like to oversimplify geopolitics, that's what you like to do.
-
I think you overestimate Tebow's roll in geopolitics.
-
I just want to watch televised Afghan Sheep Polo in peace.
-
Jet fuel can't melt steel
-
A limp noodle will hold up a meatball just as good as a melted noodle will.JaWarrenJaHooker said:Jet fuel can't melt steel
-
It isn't an oversimplification at all. It is clarity.doogsinparadise said:You like to oversimplify geopolitics, that's what you like to do.
The Israel lobby and the Saudi lobby both want us to hate Iran.
The religious right think it is their moral obligation to support god's chosen people and thus do whatever Israel wants; and the power brokers of the imported oil dependent economy think we need to do what the Saudis want, because "they are our friends".
With friends like the Saudis (backers of 9/11 and of IS)... who the fuck needs enemies?
The "issue" of Iran is just to distract the sheople. -
In 20 years Iran will be an ally of the US. It is a country with huge potential in the decades to come. It has excellent demographics and the young people are modernized, educated and very pro West. The old nutjobs there don't like the US because it overthrew their government and installed a tyrant. The young people have no recollection of that. In another decade or two the old nutjobs will be gone.
-
If you want to make accusations out here, take responsibility for them. Sign your real name to them. If not, that's what gets deleted. Always have, always will. You don't get to trash people out here anonymously. Use your real name or don't do it.
-
I'm sorry, but Saudi supports Jaish not IS because IS could metastasize within the kingdom and lead to internal revolt as is currently happening in Egypt.OZONE said:
It isn't an oversimplification at all. It is clarity.doogsinparadise said:You like to oversimplify geopolitics, that's what you like to do.
The Israel lobby and the Saudi lobby both want us to hate Iran.
The religious right think it is their moral obligation to support god's chosen people and thus do whatever Israel wants; and the power brokers of the imported oil dependent economy think we need to do what the Saudis want, because "they are our friends".
With friends like the Saudis (backers of 9/11 and of IS)... who the fuck needs enemies?
The "issue" of Iran is just to distract the sheople. -
Iran has been the only thing propping up the genocidal Assad regime for the last 18 months, so good luck telling Syrian Sunnis who have fled the country that Iran is a paper tiger.
-
You must not have heard of Russia.doogsinparadise said:Iran has been the only thing propping up the genocidal Assad regime for the last 18 months.
-
Jaish is the new player that Saudi is propping up now. Before them, they were supporting IS, if not the official Kingdom, then wealthy Saudi citizens that live under the protection of the monarchy -- just like the wealthy Saudi supporters of 9/11. These wealthy citizens are still supporting the IS terrorists. But Iran is what the sheople worry about.doogsinparadise said:
Saudi supports Jaish not ISOZONE said:
It isn't an oversimplification at all. It is clarity.doogsinparadise said:You like to oversimplify geopolitics, that's what you like to do.
The Israel lobby and the Saudi lobby both want us to hate Iran.
The religious right think it is their moral obligation to support god's chosen people and thus do whatever Israel wants; and the power brokers of the imported oil dependent economy think we need to do what the Saudis want, because "they are our friends".
With friends like the Saudis (backers of 9/11 and of IS)... who the fuck needs enemies?
The "issue" of Iran is just to distract the sheople.
Saudi Arabia has always been a monarchy (tyranny) -- while Iran had a democracy (before the US oil fear mongers overthrew it).
Iran is not the enemy. Saudi Arabia is. -
Fresh blood to throw into the hungry maw of battle is what counts, and until this week that role has been filled solely by Iran and Hizbullah. Weapons and money are nice, but then again Assad has always outgunned the opposition so that isn't the issue. You claim to find the Saudi monarchy problematic but have no issue with the theocrats in Iran? I tend to find more common ground with the average Persian, but common cultural ground shouldn't be the basis of a foreign policy.
-
I couldn't agree more but until the younger generation can wrest the power from the ayatollahs , they will remain a huge threat to the region and the world with a nuke.HeretoBeatmyChest said:In 20 years Iran will be an ally of the US. It is a country with huge potential in the decades to come. It has excellent demographics and the young people are modernized, educated and very pro West. The old nutjobs there don't like the US because it overthrew their government and installed a tyrant. The young people have no recollection of that. In another decade or two the old nutjobs will be gone.
-
Iran is an enemy irregardless of Saudi Arabia.
-
Can't we all just get along?RaceBannon said:Iran is an enemy irregardless of Saudi Arabia.
-
Spoiler: No.2001400ex said:
Can't we all just get along?RaceBannon said:Iran is an enemy irregardless of Saudi Arabia.
-
That theocracy is only there because it is all that Iran had in it's arsenal to overthrow the dictator (shah) that the US and UK installed after we overthrew their democratically elected leader. It is a process there now. I'm optimistic they will get to a democracy again... as long as the US/UK don't stand in the way... and allow the Kingdom of Saudi and Israel to dictate our policies.doogsinparadise said:You claim to find the Saudi monarchy problematic but have no issue with the theocrats in Iran?
-
Oppressive regimes don't usually just give up, as an example look at what happened in Egypt post-2011, or in Syria. The mullahs still have time and money on their side, and the anti-west line remains a pretty useful tool for rallying support. It's a big stretch to see Iranian behavior in Syria and Lebanon as likely to change much over the next few years, and so to say that we should give up nearly a century of support for the al-Saud family for more chaos and uncertainty doesn't strike me as a good choice.OZONE said:
That theocracy is only there because it is all that Iran had in it's arsenal to overthrow the dictator (shah) that the US and UK installed after we overthrew their democratically elected leader. It is a process there now. I'm optimistic they will get to a democracy again... as long as the US/UK don't stand in the way... and allow the Kingdom of Saudi and Israel to dictate our policies.doogsinparadise said:You claim to find the Saudi monarchy problematic but have no issue with the theocrats in Iran?
-
-
I know you are being sarcastic, but that would be ground zero sea, not ocean.Swaye said: -
You don't know anything about Bernie except you've heard he's a communist
-
Yes. When it becomes clear that the Saudis supported the 9/11 terrorists, and support IS, we should stop considering them our friends.doogsinparadise said:
so to say that we should give up nearly a century of support for the al-Saud family for more chaos and uncertainty doesn't strike me as a good choice.OZONE said:
That theocracy is only there because it is all that Iran had in it's arsenal to overthrow the dictator (shah) that the US and UK installed after we overthrew their democratically elected leader. It is a process there now. I'm optimistic they will get to a democracy again... as long as the US/UK don't stand in the way... and allow the Kingdom of Saudi and Israel to dictate our policies.doogsinparadise said:You claim to find the Saudi monarchy problematic but have no issue with the theocrats in Iran?
-
Taking over our embassy is cool though
-
When you overthrow a country's elected president and install a dictator, you're lucky when all they do in response is take over your embassy.RaceBannon said:Taking over our embassy is cool though
-
I'm sure the Saudis have a reason too then.OZONE said:
When you overthrow a country's elected president and install a dictator, you're lucky when all they do in response is take over your embassy.RaceBannon said:Taking over our embassy is cool though
Your logic fails. You should read a history book