A few positives in the midst of that dreck

greenblood said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.

True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.

Hippopeteamus said:

greenblood said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

greenblood said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.

True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.

Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.

Ok, I'm wrong. ...

Three possessions inside the 30 and they get 6 points. UW didn't have a scoring drive longer than about 15 yards. They have the talent, but the coaching on the offensive side of the ball is terrible.

But I don't know what I'm talking about.

If they make that kick late, would you have any faith that they'd score a TD in overtime?

If so then, you are a massive doog. Because the offense showed nothing tonight. It should be unacceptable.

You're better than this.

Better or worse than oregon's offense 2009 at Boise?

Hippopeteamus said:

Gladstone said:

Hippopeteamus said:

greenblood said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

greenblood said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.

True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.

Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.

Ok, I'm wrong. ...

Three possessions inside the 30 and they get 6 points. UW didn't have a scoring drive longer than about 15 yards. They have the talent, but the coaching on the offensive side of the ball is terrible.

But I don't know what I'm talking about.

If they make that kick late, would you have any faith that they'd score a TD in overtime?

If so then, you are a massive doog. Because the offense showed nothing tonight. It should be unacceptable.

You're better than this.

Better or worse than oregon's offense 2009 at Boise?

lol chip kelly vs jonathan fucking smith

heaven to hell comparison

I mean, granted, that Boise team went undefeated and won the fiesta bowl, but still:
Passing: Jeremiah Masoli 14/27 121 4.5 0 1
Rushing: 17att 31yds 1.8avg 1TD 17LG
Total Yards: 152