Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A few positives in the midst of that dreck

dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
in Hardcore Husky Board
1. JoJo Mathis is a fucking man.
2. Defense really turned it around after halftime. Very impressive performance after getting their shit pushed in all first half.
3. We play damn good special teams, missed FG aside. This is probably the thing I like the most about Petersen at this point.
4. Browning might be good one day. He sucks right now though. I think (hope) he'll improve significantly as the year goes on.
5. The team showed grit and fight.

Negatives are too many to list and it's 1 am here so I'm going to bed. #FireSmith
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • doogvilledoogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,220 Swaye's Wigwam
    Chill out with the rah rah for a minute. We fuckng lost to an average mid major. We are below average to average for another year.

    Fuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    doogville said:

    Chill out with the rah rah for a minute. We fuckng lost to an average mid major. We are below average to average for another year.

    Fuck.

    Negatives are too many to list and it's 1 am here so I'm going to bed. #FireSmith
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,428
    As I said a month ago, Dwayne Washington (and the rest of the running game) would be the deciding factor in this game. Our workhorse RB getting like 19 yards on 12 carries is the reason we lost, pure and simple.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    bananasnblondes said:

    As I said a month ago, Dwayne Washington (and the rest of the running game) would be the deciding factor in this game. Our workhorse RB getting like 19 yards on 12 carries is the reason we lost, pure and simple.

    14 yards on 8 carries*
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    bananasnblondes said:

    As I said a month ago, Dwayne Washington (and the rest of the running game) would be the deciding factor in this game. Our workhorse RB getting like 19 yards on 12 carries is the reason we lost, pure and simple.

    Yeah I don't see that at all. Washington didn't do anything special, but the OL didn't open up much of anything for him or the other backs either. I'm not excited about Washington's performance but I'd probably not even put him in the top 10 of people to blame.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    dnc said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    As I said a month ago, Dwayne Washington (and the rest of the running game) would be the deciding factor in this game. Our workhorse RB getting like 19 yards on 12 carries is the reason we lost, pure and simple.

    Yeah I don't see that at all. Washington didn't do anything special, but the OL didn't open up much of anything for him or the other backs either. I'm not excited about Washington's performance but I'd probably not even put him in the top 10 of people to blame.
    I'd put the total inability to run as #1 on the list. Puts even more pressure on a freshmen QB and babushka.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    BallSacked said:

    dnc said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    As I said a month ago, Dwayne Washington (and the rest of the running game) would be the deciding factor in this game. Our workhorse RB getting like 19 yards on 12 carries is the reason we lost, pure and simple.

    Yeah I don't see that at all. Washington didn't do anything special, but the OL didn't open up much of anything for him or the other backs either. I'm not excited about Washington's performance but I'd probably not even put him in the top 10 of people to blame.
    I'd put the total inability to run as #1 on the list. Puts even more pressure on a freshmen QB and babushka.
    I agree with that, but I don't put the inability to run on Washington. He's a below average back, but he can run when he has a hole. The OL didn't produce more than one or two all night. So that's 5 bigger culprits right there. Then add Petersen and Smith and Mickens and the list is expanding pretty quickly. Maybe D Wash comes in #9 or 10, but no higher. And that depends on where you put Daniels, Browning, Durkee and Van Tinkle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,530
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

    I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

    I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.
    Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    If the game goes to OT, I like UW's chances to win
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HippopeteamusHippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958
    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

    I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.
    Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.
    Ok, I'm wrong. ...

    Three possessions inside the 30 and they get 6 points. UW didn't have a scoring drive longer than about 15 yards. They have the talent, but the coaching on the offensive side of the ball is terrible.

    But I don't know what I'm talking about.

    If they make that kick late, would you have any faith that they'd score a TD in overtime?

    If so then, you are a massive doog. Because the offense showed nothing tonight. It should be unacceptable.

    You're better than this.
    Better or worse than oregon's offense 2009 at Boise?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Hippopeteamus said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

    I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.
    Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.
    Ok, I'm wrong. ...

    Three possessions inside the 30 and they get 6 points. UW didn't have a scoring drive longer than about 15 yards. They have the talent, but the coaching on the offensive side of the ball is terrible.

    But I don't know what I'm talking about.

    If they make that kick late, would you have any faith that they'd score a TD in overtime?

    If so then, you are a massive doog. Because the offense showed nothing tonight. It should be unacceptable.

    You're better than this.
    Better or worse than oregon's offense 2009 at Boise?
    lol chip kelly vs jonathan fucking smith

    heaven to hell comparison
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HippopeteamusHippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958
    edited September 2015
    Gladstone said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

    I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.
    Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.
    Ok, I'm wrong. ...

    Three possessions inside the 30 and they get 6 points. UW didn't have a scoring drive longer than about 15 yards. They have the talent, but the coaching on the offensive side of the ball is terrible.

    But I don't know what I'm talking about.

    If they make that kick late, would you have any faith that they'd score a TD in overtime?

    If so then, you are a massive doog. Because the offense showed nothing tonight. It should be unacceptable.

    You're better than this.
    Better or worse than oregon's offense 2009 at Boise?
    lol chip kelly vs jonathan fucking smith

    heaven to hell comparison
    I mean, granted, that Boise team went undefeated and won the fiesta bowl, but still:
    Passing: Jeremiah Masoli 14/27 121 4.5 0 1
    Rushing: 17att 31yds 1.8avg 1TD 17LG
    Total Yards: 152
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,778
    Hippopeteamus said:

    Gladstone said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    greenblood said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    They are still pussies, but they are a lot tougher than Sark's teams. They didn't fold and fought back to get in the game.

    The negative was that the game was very similar to our close losses from last year.

    We weren't down by 16 on the road to anyone last year with a chance to win it or tie it at the end.
    True, but none of those teams last year tried to give the game away either.

    I understand that the defense and special teams were bright spots. But the offense is so bad, it makes the team a loser. Let's face it, there was not one thing positive about this offense. UW can't win with this offense, simple as that.
    Seriously fuck off. You have no idea what you are talking about.
    Ok, I'm wrong. ...

    Three possessions inside the 30 and they get 6 points. UW didn't have a scoring drive longer than about 15 yards. They have the talent, but the coaching on the offensive side of the ball is terrible.

    But I don't know what I'm talking about.

    If they make that kick late, would you have any faith that they'd score a TD in overtime?

    If so then, you are a massive doog. Because the offense showed nothing tonight. It should be unacceptable.

    You're better than this.
    Better or worse than oregon's offense 2009 at Boise?
    lol chip kelly vs jonathan fucking smith

    heaven to hell comparison
    I mean, granted, that Boise team went undefeated and won the fiesta bowl, but still:
    Passing: Jeremiah Masoli 14/27 121 4.5 0 1
    Rushing: 17att 31yds 1.8avg 1TD 17LG
    Total Yards: 152
    Are you really?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.