Fetters getting smacked around by former Ballard HS coach
" />
" />
" /> Comments
-
-
As for Bryan Bdub, it's possible for him to care less if a kid plays at Bellevue.
-
Looks like your friend needs to charge his phone.DerekJohnson said:These came from a friend of mine; I haven't seen the rest of this thread.
" />" />" /> -
And that Derek needs to learn how to post pics w/o the image and " /> things everywhere.TommySQC said:
Looks like your friend needs to charge his phone.DerekJohnson said:These came from a friend of mine; I haven't seen the rest of this thread.
" />" />" /> -
Looks like I had a relapsewhatshouldicareabout said:
And that Derek needs to learn how to post pics w/o the image and " /> things everywhere.TommySQC said:
Looks like your friend needs to charge his phone.DerekJohnson said:These came from a friend of mine; I haven't seen the rest of this thread.
" />" />" /> -
Fetters posted that 11 page "response" by a Bellevue assistant coach that reads like a 6th grader's essay where the requirement was 11 pages. Fetters posted something like "now what do you guys think".
The funny thing is, more posters sided against the dawgman company line after he posted it, including this little tidbit.
Poster A (Bellevue player):Also ask yourself this--What do Kim, Chris and Scott have to gain by standing up for Bellevue in this Seattle Times onslaught?
Poster B: I would get banned for stating the reason. I was banned last week for it.
and also this:
Poster C: I don't care if a majority of people "want Bellevue to fall no matter what" (nor do I care enough to argue the legitimacy of that sweeping statement of yours). I'm not one of them, and I have no axe to grind with Bellevue. But these are very serious allegations coming from a very prominent newspaper. You and the Dawgman staff are fighting tooth and nail to try to convince people to disregard everything that is being reported, but most reasonable people are not so easily convinced.
As for your question of what do the Dawgman staff here have to gain by defending Bellevue? That's quite easy to determine. Their ability to get access to high school athletes and programs is an integral driver of their revenue; subscriptions from members who want reports on those athletes and programs. Bellevue just so happens to be the most successful program in the state with the highest number of high profile college football recruits. Not only do the staff have relationships with the people being accused of wrongdoings, but they also want to continue to building those relationships and continue to get better access to the players and coaches. The self interests here are not hard to identify, and I'm sure the folks at Bellevue are going to be grateful for the defense the Dawgman staff has mounted for them, whether it's justified or not. -
your fren is on the sauce, hard
-
I don't really agree. I think you are making a $10 argument for a 10 cent problem. They know the Bellevue guys and the Bellevue guys were nice to them over the years; they look up to the BHS guys. It's not really about business, it's just about validation.bananasnblondes said:Fetters posted that 11 page "response" by a Bellevue assistant coach that reads like a 6th grader's essay where the requirement was 11 pages. Fetters posted something like "now what do you guys think".
The funny thing is, more posters sided against the dawgman company line after he posted it, including this little tidbit.
Poster A (Bellevue player):Also ask yourself this--What do Kim, Chris and Scott have to gain by standing up for Bellevue in this Seattle Times onslaught?
Poster B: I would get banned for stating the reason. I was banned last week for it.
and also this:
Poster C: I don't care if a majority of people "want Bellevue to fall no matter what" (nor do I care enough to argue the legitimacy of that sweeping statement of yours). I'm not one of them, and I have no axe to grind with Bellevue. But these are very serious allegations coming from a very prominent newspaper. You and the Dawgman staff are fighting tooth and nail to try to convince people to disregard everything that is being reported, but most reasonable people are not so easily convinced.
As for your question of what do the Dawgman staff here have to gain by defending Bellevue? That's quite easy to determine. Their ability to get access to high school athletes and programs is an integral driver of their revenue; subscriptions from members who want reports on those athletes and programs. Bellevue just so happens to be the most successful program in the state with the highest number of high profile college football recruits. Not only do the staff have relationships with the people being accused of wrongdoings, but they also want to continue to building those relationships and continue to get better access to the players and coaches. The self interests here are not hard to identify, and I'm sure the folks at Bellevue are going to be grateful for the defense the Dawgman staff has mounted for them, whether it's justified or not.
If they were that shrewd about business, HH wouldn't have existed in the first place and dm.c would be amazing.
Bellevue can't tell them anything they won't already know. They don't need BHS for anything at all. Everyone knows everything within 2 minutes of it happening now anyways. They aren't really shrewdly self-interested in the business sense; they're just defending people that were nice to them for no reason beyond that. -
Flagged for giving Doogman way too much credit.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I don't really agree. I think you are making a $10 argument for a 10 cent problem. They know the Bellevue guys and the Bellevue guys were nice to them over the years; they look up to the BHS guys. It's not really about business, it's just about validation.bananasnblondes said:Fetters posted that 11 page "response" by a Bellevue assistant coach that reads like a 6th grader's essay where the requirement was 11 pages. Fetters posted something like "now what do you guys think".
The funny thing is, more posters sided against the dawgman company line after he posted it, including this little tidbit.
Poster A (Bellevue player):Also ask yourself this--What do Kim, Chris and Scott have to gain by standing up for Bellevue in this Seattle Times onslaught?
Poster B: I would get banned for stating the reason. I was banned last week for it.
and also this:
Poster C: I don't care if a majority of people "want Bellevue to fall no matter what" (nor do I care enough to argue the legitimacy of that sweeping statement of yours). I'm not one of them, and I have no axe to grind with Bellevue. But these are very serious allegations coming from a very prominent newspaper. You and the Dawgman staff are fighting tooth and nail to try to convince people to disregard everything that is being reported, but most reasonable people are not so easily convinced.
As for your question of what do the Dawgman staff here have to gain by defending Bellevue? That's quite easy to determine. Their ability to get access to high school athletes and programs is an integral driver of their revenue; subscriptions from members who want reports on those athletes and programs. Bellevue just so happens to be the most successful program in the state with the highest number of high profile college football recruits. Not only do the staff have relationships with the people being accused of wrongdoings, but they also want to continue to building those relationships and continue to get better access to the players and coaches. The self interests here are not hard to identify, and I'm sure the folks at Bellevue are going to be grateful for the defense the Dawgman staff has mounted for them, whether it's justified or not.
If they were that shrewd about business, HH wouldn't have existed in the first place and dm.c would be amazing.
Bellevue can't tell them anything they won't already know. They don't need BHS for anything at all. Everyone knows everything within 2 minutes of it happening now anyways. They aren't really shrewdly self-interested in the business sense; they're just defending people that were nice to them for no reason beyond that. -
Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
-
Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
-
Fixed by adding HS in front of coaches.Dennis_DeYoung said:
HS Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
It constantly amazes me how much fucking attention is paid to 16, 17, 18 your old kids that quite frankly haven't done shit yet. So what if you are the fucking shit in your high school. Happens all over the place ... go watch Friday Night Lights if that's your thing.
The only people that should really give a shit about HS athletics are those that are playing in them and to a lesser degree those that are currently in school. If you are a parent, it's nice to see your kids win but more important that they are continuing to develop both as a person, student, and athlete. As a coach, your job is to do the same. The whole concept of winning at all costs in HS is so fucking wrong ... HS sports is about the scum of the earth at this point. -
Fuck ESPN.Tequilla said:
Fixed by adding HS in front of coaches.Dennis_DeYoung said:
HS Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
It constantly amazes me how much fucking attention is paid to 16, 17, 18 your old kids that quite frankly haven't done shit yet. So what if you are the fucking shit in your high school. Happens all over the place ... go watch Friday Night Lights if that's your thing.
The only people that should really give a shit about HS athletics are those that are playing in them and to a lesser degree those that are currently in school. If you are a parent, it's nice to see your kids win but more important that they are continuing to develop both as a person, student, and athlete. As a coach, your job is to do the same. The whole concept of winning at all costs in HS is so fucking wrong ... HS sports is about the scum of the earth at this point. -
Yet you/we all still watch ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fuck ESPN.Tequilla said:
Fixed by adding HS in front of coaches.Dennis_DeYoung said:
HS Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
It constantly amazes me how much fucking attention is paid to 16, 17, 18 your old kids that quite frankly haven't done shit yet. So what if you are the fucking shit in your high school. Happens all over the place ... go watch Friday Night Lights if that's your thing.
The only people that should really give a shit about HS athletics are those that are playing in them and to a lesser degree those that are currently in school. If you are a parent, it's nice to see your kids win but more important that they are continuing to develop both as a person, student, and athlete. As a coach, your job is to do the same. The whole concept of winning at all costs in HS is so fucking wrong ... HS sports is about the scum of the earth at this point.
ESPN's propping up of HS sports has everything to do with Disney, low rights fees, over zealous portions of our country (notably SEC!!! land) and profits. -
FixedTequilla said:
Yet you/we all still watch ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fuck ESPN.Tequilla said:
Fixed by adding HS in front of coaches.Dennis_DeYoung said:
HS Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
It constantly amazes me how much fucking attention is paid to 16, 17, 18 your old kids that quite frankly haven't done shit yet. So what if you are the fucking shit in your high school. Happens all over the place ... go watch Friday Night Lights if that's your thing.
The only people that should really give a shit about HS athletics are those that are playing in them and to a lesser degree those that are currently in school. If you are a parent, it's nice to see your kids win but more important that they are continuing to develop both as a person, student, and athlete. As a coach, your job is to do the same. The whole concept of winning at all costs in HS is so fucking wrong ... HS sports is about the scum of the earth at this point.
ESPN's propping up of HS sports has everything to do with Disney, low rights fees, over zealous portions of our country (notably the HH teen boy stocking bored) and profits. -
Teq, I never understood that shit either. The Razores getting boners over Bellevue winning and donating hundreds of thousands of dollars for their fucking high school to do so is fucking pathetic.
My brother in law walked on at wazzu and now coaches at my alma mater because it's the closest HS to where they lived and he likes coaching. I ask him about the team every once in a while, is there any players going D1, etc. Maybe once a season I'll check how they're doing. But ardently following a high school team 10, 20 years after you went there is beyond pathetic. -
I lost interest in ESPN when I became old rich and white. I enjoyed it for the first 20 years or so. Whether ESPN changed or I did, I find it unwatchable except for college football which I have to watch. Just the games.
-
RaceBannon said:
I lost interest in ESPN when I became old rich and white. I enjoyed it for the first 20 years or so. Whether ESPN changed or I did, I find it unwatchable except for college football which I have to watch. Just the games.
-
Nail. Hammer. Head.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I don't really agree. I think you are making a $10 argument for a 10 cent problem. They know the Bellevue guys and the Bellevue guys were nice to them over the years; they look up to the BHS guys. It's not really about business, it's just about validation.bananasnblondes said:Fetters posted that 11 page "response" by a Bellevue assistant coach that reads like a 6th grader's essay where the requirement was 11 pages. Fetters posted something like "now what do you guys think".
The funny thing is, more posters sided against the dawgman company line after he posted it, including this little tidbit.
Poster A (Bellevue player):Also ask yourself this--What do Kim, Chris and Scott have to gain by standing up for Bellevue in this Seattle Times onslaught?
Poster B: I would get banned for stating the reason. I was banned last week for it.
and also this:
Poster C: I don't care if a majority of people "want Bellevue to fall no matter what" (nor do I care enough to argue the legitimacy of that sweeping statement of yours). I'm not one of them, and I have no axe to grind with Bellevue. But these are very serious allegations coming from a very prominent newspaper. You and the Dawgman staff are fighting tooth and nail to try to convince people to disregard everything that is being reported, but most reasonable people are not so easily convinced.
As for your question of what do the Dawgman staff here have to gain by defending Bellevue? That's quite easy to determine. Their ability to get access to high school athletes and programs is an integral driver of their revenue; subscriptions from members who want reports on those athletes and programs. Bellevue just so happens to be the most successful program in the state with the highest number of high profile college football recruits. Not only do the staff have relationships with the people being accused of wrongdoings, but they also want to continue to building those relationships and continue to get better access to the players and coaches. The self interests here are not hard to identify, and I'm sure the folks at Bellevue are going to be grateful for the defense the Dawgman staff has mounted for them, whether it's justified or not.
If they were that shrewd about business, HH wouldn't have existed in the first place and dm.c would be amazing.
Bellevue can't tell them anything they won't already know. They don't need BHS for anything at all. Everyone knows everything within 2 minutes of it happening now anyways. They aren't really shrewdly self-interested in the business sense; they're just defending people that were nice to them for no reason beyond that.
The only thing bigger than that football, is the CEO's ego. It must be defended at all cost. -
Those are some serious charges.DerekJohnson said:RaceBannon said:I lost interest in ESPN when I became old rich and white. I enjoyed it for the first 20 years or so. Whether ESPN changed or I did, I find it unwatchable except for college football which I have to watch. Just the games.
#Rapeculture
-
I kind of agree, but Bellevue did develop the kids into college football players. Guys like the LPT, ESPN, and other ardent TBSers are the real scum. There is nothing wrong with winning. I'm sure Bellevue develops the kids better than most high school football programs.Tequilla said:
Fixed by adding HS in front of coaches.Dennis_DeYoung said:
HS Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
It constantly amazes me how much fucking attention is paid to 16, 17, 18 your old kids that quite frankly haven't done shit yet. So what if you are the fucking shit in your high school. Happens all over the place ... go watch Friday Night Lights if that's your thing.
The only people that should really give a shit about HS athletics are those that are playing in them and to a lesser degree those that are currently in school. If you are a parent, it's nice to see your kids win but more important that they are continuing to develop both as a person, student, and athlete. As a coach, your job is to do the same. The whole concept of winning at all costs in HS is so fucking wrong ... HS sports is about the scum of the earth at this point. -
Most people don't watch high school football (the fucktarded national games). Well, on this bored, who knows...but most sports fans that aren't TBSers don't bother. Every real game is on a channel owned by a gigantic conglomerate...pretty much impossible to avoid these days.Tequilla said:
Yet you/we all still watch ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fuck ESPN.Tequilla said:
Fixed by adding HS in front of coaches.Dennis_DeYoung said:
HS Coaches vs. online sports media in a facebook comment fight is basically as low as humanity can sink.Tequilla said:Any time you reference JCDuck and cite his integrity (keep in mind that this is the same individual that once sent me his phone number so that we could rumble over the phone) as a comp against anybody, notably the Lemon Party, that's when you know you should re-evaluate your position.
It constantly amazes me how much fucking attention is paid to 16, 17, 18 your old kids that quite frankly haven't done shit yet. So what if you are the fucking shit in your high school. Happens all over the place ... go watch Friday Night Lights if that's your thing.
The only people that should really give a shit about HS athletics are those that are playing in them and to a lesser degree those that are currently in school. If you are a parent, it's nice to see your kids win but more important that they are continuing to develop both as a person, student, and athlete. As a coach, your job is to do the same. The whole concept of winning at all costs in HS is so fucking wrong ... HS sports is about the scum of the earth at this point.
ESPN's propping up of HS sports has everything to do with Disney, low rights fees, over zealous portions of our country (notably SEC!!! land) and profits. -
tierbs hsot boobs?Penace said:your fren is on the sauce, hard
-
If you think fetters and the other 2 stooges aren't enjoying this extra attention, you are thinking wrong. This is the perfect time for them to say "see, we don't cater to anybody. We stick to our guns, regardless." What they won't tell you is if this was the current Ballard coach, they wouldn't be anywhere near a comment board fight. This just shows you that their only loyalty is to who ever can help their media presence.
