Eklund's practice report said Lind quiet looked like shit - overthrowing wide open receivers, etc. He said Magna Carta looked much more solid (minus the one INT)
From reading Petersen's quotes, he sounds high on Dwayne Washington. Feeney at Buck is good shit too. He's always been a missle when he blitzes. I'm not sure he has any pass rushing moves, but with his speed, that might not be all that important.
Eklund's practice report said Lind quiet looked like shit - overthrowing wide open receivers, etc. He said Magna Carta looked much more solid (minus the one INT)
Wide open receivers? Code for the secondary is shit.
Eklund's practice report said Lind quiet looked like shit - overthrowing wide open receivers, etc. He said Magna Carta looked much more solid (minus the one INT)
Wide open receivers? Code for the secondary is shit.
Based on last year, I'd bet no. Young group but they looked solid last year. Receivers do get open from time to time. It's one of their jobs, along with catch the ball, and run.
Well, the one thing I will say about things is that our players improved last year. If DWash improves, if Feeney improves (I am loathe to admit the existence of Littleton), if Sid Jones and Budda improve like people did last year, they could all be very good players. DWash just has no instincts for running. Obviously if they can use him well, though, he is very dangerous.
Comments
It appeared no one was thrilled to be there....
First quarter slow starts here we come!
Probably will again.