Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Roof Think Browning Should Start

178101213

Comments

  • RavennaDawg
    RavennaDawg Member Posts: 846

    TTJ said:

    There is a mountain of evidence that playing true frosh is fool's gold. (At any position, much less QB.) And zero evidence that redshirting somehow retards a player's development.

    This is so astonishingly uncomplicated.

    [citation needed]
    Since he made it up, he will have difficulty finding a citation.

    I remember watching Kaufman in 1992, thinking "Wow, he is really good. Think how much better he would be if he had spent last year sitting on the bench and this was his first year playing. And I would feel more comfortable with Bruener if he had not caught that td in the Rose Bowl last year."

    Do people sincerely think Tui learned nothing from 1997 that he could have learned simply from watching from the sideline? Are Baker and Dissly are less prepared for 2015 because they played last year?

    Playing prepares you for playing.

  • seatownfunk
    seatownfunk Member Posts: 807
    What if Mario and Orlando redshirted???? 1992 could have been special.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    What if Mario and Orlando redshirted???? 1992 could have been special.

    Orlando sucked. HTH.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    edited July 2015

    TTJ said:

    There is a mountain of evidence that playing true frosh is fool's gold. (At any position, much less QB.) And zero evidence that redshirting somehow retards a player's development.

    This is so astonishingly uncomplicated.

    [citation needed]
    If you need citations to understand that true frosh suck as a general rule, I cannot help you. Re-watching the past twenty years of Husky football would be a good start. Or perhaps re-reading this thread.
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,733
    In the perfect world, in order of importance.....

    1. Redshirt all OL and DL
    2. Redshirt QBs
    3. Redshirt everyone else

    At the end of the day, best players play.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    TTJ said:

    TTJ said:

    There is a mountain of evidence that playing true frosh is fool's gold. (At any position, much less QB.) And zero evidence that redshirting somehow retards a player's development.

    This is so astonishingly uncomplicated.

    [citation needed]
    If you need citations to understand that true frosh suck as a general rule, I cannot help you. Re-watching the past twenty years of Husky football would be a good start. Or perhaps re-reading this thread.
    That's some dark shit man. You have me wondering if I even want to keep poasting here.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    dnc said:

    That's some dark shit man. You have me wondering if I even want to keep poasting here.

    @dnc is right. I owe boobs an apology. I shouldn't wish something like that on anybody.

    I will start another thread comprehensively listing every Husky who truly excelled as a true frosh over the past 25 years.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,473 Founders Club

    HuskyInAZ said:

    In the perfect world, in order of importance.....

    1. Redshirt all OL and DL
    2. Redshirt QBs
    3. Redshirt everyone else

    At the end of the day, best players play.

    Exactly how I feel.

    You guys are dooging so hard for Browning it's unsettling.
    Because of the potential shitshow passing offense we might see this year if it's not him.