Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

One thing for us to keep in mind

1235

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,658
    Dardanus said:

    PGOS - you have received the Gilby/Fleenor double awesome! Congrats!
    You're two thirds of the way to a lemon party...keep up the great poasting!

    image

    not a dry eye in the PGOS harem
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,784 Founders Club
    FremontTroll said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    This 4 wins stuff is ridiculous. We are going to suck, but should we really suck more than we have in year's past? I can understand maybe a 6 win o/u, but 4? Fuck me runnin Cocker!

    How many times do I have to post that the over under is not fucking 4 and never fucking was 4 before you fucksticks that failed out of remedial high school fucking maths fucking get it. Fuck!
    @NotEvenMoneyDawg is available.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Dardanus said:

    PGOS - you have received the Gilby/Fleenor double awesome! Congrats!
    You're two thirds of the way to a lemon party...keep up the great poasting!

    image

    not a dry eye in the PGOS harem
    I don't get this. He wins some award for saying nobody reads my posts. But if that is true, then why does he win an award since he would have to read my posts in order to say nobody reads my posts.

    Also, people need to stop with the excuse of so-and-so's players on the team are the problem. All that does is create a bunch of fucking message board posts. It's right in there with "team is young".... also somebody pointed out that the OL changed blocking schemes, and that was the cause of problems. BULL-FUCKING-SHIT. Those dudes , for one thing, are ready to rumble in any scheme... also a guy who has played at this level knows what the hell the different scheme is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,658
    ApostleofGrief said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Dardanus said:

    PGOS - you have received the Gilby/Fleenor double awesome! Congrats!
    You're two thirds of the way to a lemon party...keep up the great poasting!

    image

    not a dry eye in the PGOS harem
    I don't get this. He wins some award for saying nobody reads my posts. But if that is true, then why does he win an award since he would have to read my posts in order to say nobody reads my posts.

    Also, people need to stop with the excuse of so-and-so's players on the team are the problem. All that does is create a bunch of fucking message board posts. It's right in there with "team is young".... also somebody pointed out that the OL changed blocking schemes, and that was the cause of problems. BULL-FUCKING-SHIT. Those dudes , for one thing, are ready to rumble in any scheme... also a guy who has played at this level knows what the hell the different scheme is.
    uhhh
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    well, even if the prestitious fleenor-sweetman award is prestigious, I still don't see how PGOS is going to make room in his mom's basement for a harem. It's also still an unexplained mystery to me how he says nobody reads my posts, yet he seems to downvote and troll virtually all of my posts. So under that reasoning, when he says "nobody" he is in fact referring to himself. Nobody.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,688 Founders Club
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    A big key and indicator for future success for me this year will be watching closely the true sophmores and RS-Freshmen. If we really start to see those guys flash and make plays it will be a huge indicator going forward.

    Specifically, players like Jojo McIntosh, Darren Gardenhire, Jaylen Johnson (String), Greg Gaines, Virta Vea (if he is healthy), Lenius, Dotson, etc.; those types of players. If we see a bunch of those types of players playing well it will really give me hope heading into 2016, and overall for the program because I'll feel a lot better about recruiting evaluations.

    And then if there is the "Andrew Hudson" effect on some older Sark recruits that would be another terrific sign of player development.

    I know there was talk the other day about needing to be #3 in the conference behind USC, UCLA in recruiting to have a chance. I agree with that to an extent, but not fully. I think if we can never fall below #5 in the conference we can compete and win. If Petersen can bring in the players he has been bringing in, and also supplement that with the evaluations that he was famous for at Boise we will be just fine at that level. That is why I will be watching his players so closely this fall.

    If his players start developing like crazy this year I will be doogin' pretty hard for 2016.

    I always thought you looked closely because of their well-developed hips and bulging thighs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited July 2015
    DerekJohnson said:

    MisterEm said:

    bananasnblondes said:


    If UW can get a RB to step up and perform at a high level, it will make a world of difference.

    Disagree.

    Give me consistent OL and competent QB play and the RB will take care of itself.

    A world class RB on the other hand, will not mask the play of a mediocre line and/or QB.

    Marshawn Lynch has been masking a mediocre Seahawks line for years
    So Russell Wilson is Cyler Miles?

    Even Tarvaris could throw a 25 yard fade.

    Way to adress only the part of the argument that suits your comment. Next. ;)

    EDIT: The Seahawks "mediocre" line includes the individual awards given out to the likes of Unger (former) and Okung. Correct?

    Atoe, Tufunga, Criste, et al...couldn't sniff an individual award in 4+ years.

    If the Seahawks line is mediocre, the Huskies line is/was DIII, at best. But still...

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter