PM to PLSS

Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.
Again.

Comments
-
-
Christ.
-
Time to nut up Puppy. You remember the story of the little boy who cried wolf?
The moral of the story is never cry shitwolf - Officer Lahey
-
So it's different if you whine to him "openly" in here about me?ThomasFremont said:Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.
Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.
Again.
Please take your own advice, POS.
I'm talking to you, muther fucker. -
This thread has been moved to the Gulag.
-
-
Your honor, please mark this thread as exhibit 23,786 of d2d's complete lack of getting it.
-
Was this thread supposed to be funny, or was it about Tommy being a whining little bitch?TheGlove said:Your honor, please mark this thread as exhibit 23,786 of d2d's complete lack of getting it.
Please explain your logic? -
Coming on strong, its like he thinks everyone forgot about him being a fake war hero and fake lawyer or something
-
Things Libtards do to Avoid Having an Honest Debate:AZDuck said:Coming on strong, its like he thinks everyone forgot about him being a fake war hero and fake lawyer or something
1. Ad Hominem (Name-Calling aka alleged fake war hero, alleged fake attorney; with no proof of the allegation.) BULLYING...BULLYING. Interesting. Take out the BUL and you're just plain Lying.
2. Distracting (aka “Pivoting” aka “Changing the Subject”)
"Sometimes, arguing with radicals seems like an exercise in futility. But remember, you’re not always arguing to change their minds, but the minds of rational people who are observing the debate, but are too timid to enter the discussion for fear of the Libtard attack tactics."
Derek doesn't like it when people hijack the thread, which you have done in this case. The subject is:"Is Tommy a POS for bullying Puppy and then whining when Derek calls him out on it."
Tommy has not provided any evidence that Derek received a complaint from Puppy. He could have re-posted Derek's PM. Why didn't he? Instead, he just hung the allegation in the air with no supporting evidence. If he was an attorney, a judge would hand him his lunch for doing that. But what do I know? I'm just an alleged fake attorney, which you too provided no evidence.
A lot of that going around in here. -
Proof ???ThomasFremont said:Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.
Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.
Again. -
Jesus
-
Actually, if you read the thread about your shitposting and potential banning, I said crying to Derek about banning people was bullshit.d2d said:
So it's different if you whine to him "openly" in here about me?ThomasFremont said:Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.
Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.
Again.
Please take your own advice, POS.
I'm talking to you, muther fucker.
It's easier to keep the facts straight when you're not a compulsive liar.
Try it sometime. -
ThomasFremont said:
Actually, if you read the thread about your shitposting and potential banning, I said crying to Derek about banning people was bullshit.d2d said:
So it's different if you whine to him "openly" in here about me?ThomasFremont said:Got another warning from Stalin in my inbox.
Apparently I have been going too hard on poor little Sugar Steve, so he ran crying to Derek.
Again.
Please take your own advice, POS.
I'm talking to you, muther fucker.
It's easier to keep the facts straight when you're not a compulsive liar.
Try it sometime. -
This thread. It sucks.
-
It now includes pussy so it can't suck that badSwaye said:This thread. It sucks.
-
If that was the case d2d threads would never suck.*FreeChavez said:
It now includes pussy so it can't suck that badSwaye said:This thread. It sucks.
*note to d2d, yes, that was name-calling.
-
-
dflea said:
-
MisterEm said: