#MyChico in the Long Jump!

Built like a mini tank!
Comments
-
PagingWeAreATrackSchool...
-
You call that a mini tank? That's no mini tank m8. Now this, this is a mini tank:
-
He looks more like Maurice jones drew than I expected.
-
I can see how Joel got his offer from Mississippi State!UWerentThereMan said:You call that a mini tank? That's no mini tank m8. Now this, this is a mini tank:
Also, on Chico... if you can jump 23' and you're 5'6, you're explosive. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
I can see how Joel got his offer from Mississippi State!UWerentThereMan said:You call that a mini tank? That's no mini tank m8. Now this, this is a mini tank:
Also, on Chico... if you can jump 23' and you're 5'6, you're explosive.
My thoughts exactly. That kid is an explosive athlete. Should be fun to watch. -
This kid is going to add some muscle too.... looks like a kick return or two is in his future.
-
Great hips
-
Travelled farther than any of Miles' throws last year.
-
considering there are only 4 scholarship WR on the roster, one has to assume he will Play. Mickens 5-10. Hall 5-9. Pettis 5-11 and Chico 5-7. Fuck
-
Hopefully Smith is FS enough to convert Daniels back to WR so he can play him and the other tight ends at the same timePenace said:considering there are only 4 scholarship WR on the roster, one has to assume he will Play. Mickens 5-10. Hall 5-9. Pettis 5-11 and Chico 5-7. Fuck
-
Is Chico playing WR or RB?
-
He's listed at WR.RoadDawg55 said:Is Chico playing WR or RB?
I'm slowly realizing that I have faith in Smith to butt fuck our offense and nothing else. -
This thing might be even funnier after seeing it 23 times. Good chit!UWerentThereMan said:You call that a mini tank? That's no mini tank m8. Now this, this is a mini tank:
-
Is there a difference in this offense between bubble screen WR and running back
-
Running back. Maurice Drew is the valid comparison.
-
Chico will probably line up in the slot most of the time, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him in motion a lot, moving him to the backfield and taking hand-offs from whoever our QB is or doing fly-sweeps.
-
Ill admit he is alot thicker than I imagined. With a 23.5 jump he does have some serious explosion. This guy might be better than I thought. We will find out as both and another incoming freshman (Probably renfro...unless we put another sub 6 footer in) will see time at WR this season
-
Actually reminds me of NatePenace said:Ill admit he is alot thicker than I imagined. With a 23.5 jump he does have some serious explosion. This guy might be better than I thought. We will find out as both and another incoming freshman (Probably renfro...unless we put another sub 6 footer in) will see time at WR this season
-
Doesn't appear to have Nate's wingspan, but that kid looks like a serious athlete. Just get him the ball in space and let him make opposing defenses look silly trying to catch him.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Actually reminds me of NatePenace said:Ill admit he is alot thicker than I imagined. With a 23.5 jump he does have some serious explosion. This guy might be better than I thought. We will find out as both and another incoming freshman (Probably renfro...unless we put another sub 6 footer in) will see time at WR this season
Way too early to tell, but it sure appears that Peterson is recruiting better than I think most expected, certainly way better than KJV is desperately spinning the situation. Shart left some serious brown streaks behind, Peterman has been in clorox mode. Significant talent gaps are being filled in positions that matter. Coach em up and we'll see the Huskies become a serious threat. This is something he needs to pay real attention to. I haven't heard an excuse or complaint from Peterman yet, and don't expect to, but he has to hold his staff accountable. Kawasaki and Socha seem to be doing good jobs, but Smith looked like crap last year. That needs to be corrected, by oversight, mentoring or replacement, or Peterman won't be the guy who turns this thing around. -
I hate our midget wide outs. 1 or 2 on the roster is fine but this many is a waste. I see Chico more likely as a doog legend to finish his career at central or eastern.
I am going to assume Oregon would have been all over him if they thought he was anything close to the mamba. That's my analysis. And that's why I don't pay my 10.95 a month to dawgman. -
My bullshit analysis would be that Chico will likely get lost at WR. He'll make a couple of big plays, but will mostly be a non-descript midget receiver. At RB, he might have a shot if he can get bulk up enough.
-
MJD got up to nearly 210 pounds with 4.5 speed by the time he left UCLA. They may be the same height, but Chico has to be at least 20 or 30 pounds lighter, and he's already kind of muscular. Crazy explosive though, I see someone closer in use to DAT than MJD at the pac12 level.chuck said:Running back. Maurice Drew is the valid comparison.
-
My bullshit anal is let him return kicks and take a few bubble screens. For the guys more in the know with Washington high school football, is he better than Gaskin at RB? If not let h him take over the hamster slot position.
-
The Christiansen guy from UDR said Chico was the most explosive player in the state. I believe he said he liked Chico more than Gaskin, but don't hold me to that.Doogles said:My bullshit anal is let him return kicks and take a few bubble screens. For the guys more in the know with Washington high school football, is he better than Gaskin at RB? If not let h him take over the hamster slot position.
-
Where does Joyner fall into this equation? Cuz Gaskin, Chico and Joyner (in special packages) could all see time at RB in their careers.RoadDawg55 said:
The Christiansen guy from UDR said Chico was the most explosive player in the state. I believe he said he liked Chico more than Gaskin, but don't hold me to that.Doogles said:My bullshit anal is let him return kicks and take a few bubble screens. For the guys more in the know with Washington high school football, is he better than Gaskin at RB? If not let h him take over the hamster slot position.
-
My RB order for those three:whatshouldicareabout said:
Where does Joyner fall into this equation? Cuz Gaskin, Chico and Joyner (in special packages) could all see time at RB in their careers.RoadDawg55 said:
The Christiansen guy from UDR said Chico was the most explosive player in the state. I believe he said he liked Chico more than Gaskin, but don't hold me to that.Doogles said:My bullshit anal is let him return kicks and take a few bubble screens. For the guys more in the know with Washington high school football, is he better than Gaskin at RB? If not let h him take over the hamster slot position.
Joyner
Gaskin
Chico
I love Joyner at RB, luckily Gaskin is good enough that he can play DB. -
I thought Joyner wanted to play safety? Either way, I'm down with setting if any new guy can carry the rock because our options all have big question marks.
-
He wants to play DB and I think he'll be a really good safety. Between him and Gaskin I like our RB options a lot.
DONT SLEEP ON GASKIN, PEOPLE!!!1 -
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
He wants to play DB and I think he'll be a really good safety. Between him and Gaskin I like our RB options a lot.
DONT SLEEPONWITH GASKIN, PEOPLE!!!1