Ken Griswold has a change of heart

It appears that Griswold has had a change of heart in this matter. After a new poster compared Coach Petersen's leadership to "watching the sinking of the Titanic" and that Petersen"forcing Miles out" and "not utilizing Kasen" showed a real "lack of integrity". To quote the poster, a "good coach would have built on the foundation left by the previous staff".
At first, the post seemed destined to sink as most disregarded it. Then the CEO chose to bump the post by responding "Let's see who bites on this".
After a few people voiced their agitation, this appeared signaling that Griswold has changed his mind regarding freedom of speech on his boards:
"Ignoring stuff is more effective than engaging, getting pissed, and complaining to the mods. There's always going to be those who have fun engaging. Recognize stuff for what it is. "
Kim Grinolds
Unfortunately,when some of us chose to "have fun engaging" in the past, were no longer allowed to "engage"
Comments
-
I don't give a flying fuck what that cunt thinks. The question is why so many here do? I'm sure that faggit likes the attention more than an actual brb blonde.
-
If Kent Griswold had any balls at all, he'd lift all IP bans.
Until that he is just talking shit and not smoking weed like Lane Kiffen.
-
Do the mathCPA_Dawg said:I don't give a flying fuck what that cunt thinks. The question is why so many here do? I'm sure that faggit likes the attention more than an actual brb blonde.
-
He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
I believe bananasnblondes had tongue firmly planted in cheekCheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
How many times have there been first time posters complaining about Petersen since the jacket-in-the-office incident?
I'm guessing 81.
FTFYCheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark hewould have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.wouldn't have created a new account and made the post to begin with.
You guys know better. -
One of the older KimismsCheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guysknoware better than that.<----- Faggoty ($75K) Wink
-
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
Beezle is grinolds
COOK IT! -
Someone here has been saying this for awhilejecornel said:Beezle is grinolds
COOK IT! -
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
His avatar is in line with Kim's pretend pimp-bachelor bullshit.jecornel said:Beezle is grinolds
COOK IT! -
Cleaned it up so Beezle could understand it.CheersWestDawg said:
Taeks 1 2 no one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
I don't have time to use three letters so I just use r.
-
-
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen. -
About 2/3 of this board has been critical of Petersen.beelzebub said:
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.
But don't let that stop you from using terms like "scorched earth". -
Petersen isn't doing anything different this year, unless you're counting the fact that he's not just coming into the job in December. He's on record as saying that this is the system his staff runs, and it's the only system they know and they know it will work.beelzebub said:
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
And Kim has reason enough to dislike Petersen when he says his TBS star-stroking job is a bunch of bullshit that his staff wants no part of. -
Kill yourselfbeelzebub said:
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen. -
Beezlecunt: He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Are you really that dumb or were you born yesterday? Everyone, including Kent (hi Kim) knows that fallacy holds zero water and is just a made up argument for those who get kicked out of Peterman's office. Peterman's first class, which he had less than 2 months to put it together, was ranked 35th and closed out with four 4star kids with an average star ranking of 3. Not spectacular but by any level-headed, impartial observer, a very solid first class, not even taking into account the extremely limited time period.
Comparing Peterman's class to Sark's 5th class is comparing apples to oranges. But you already knew that. Nevermind that Peterman signed as many 4star kids and a had a higher avg star ranking in his first full class than Sark did in his 5th. But if you want to compare apples to apples, Sark's 2009 class was ranked 66th, signed one 4star and averaged 2.5 stars per player. And that's without taking into account the benefit of hindsight, where we now know that the 2009 class is far, far worse than 66th in actual results.
But, I mean, 0-12, right?
-
Beezlekim,beelzebub said:
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.you'reur really a stupid fuck.
You hate Petersen because he doesn't like you or others like you who hang around and onto the program expecting them to coddle and feed your desire to advance yourself as an insider.
The attacks on his recruiting in his first year were completely unwarranted and unjustifiable and showed right away that you were holding Petersen to a completely different standard than the previous crew of buffoons. Sark's first class was an epic failure that was defended because, well, it just shouldn't count because it shouldn't. Petersen's was a solid class by any measure, full of balance and stars, that was panned for not having enough...well, what was it lacking exactly?KimBeezlekim has called him out at every opportunity, showing a zeal for critiquing the coach. He has a zeal for it that far exceeds what he was willing to tolerate from posters when it came to the previous staff. It's really, really simple and obvious. You lost this one before it started because everyone here and even the dumb asses still paying on DM.c know it. You're just too fucking stupid to accept it and find a new argument. -
Awesomed for Beezlekim
-
seatownfunk said:
Awesomed
for4 Beezlekim -
Ur getin with the program. @beelzebub approves.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:seatownfunk said:Awesomed
for4 Beezlekim -
Are people in this thread really engaging and arguing with @beelzebub?
-
I'm old enough to remember when Kim's bored had so much traffic he didn't have time to post on a competitor's board... under an alias... posing as a retard.
-
A psych grad student could write a dissertation about the way Beez has become a Kim proxy for posters struggling to come to terms with how Doogman treated them.Dennis_DeYoung said:Are people in this thread really engaging and arguing with @beelzebub?
-
Fixed that for yousarktastic said:I'm old enough to remember when Kim's bored had so much traffic he didn't have time to post on a competitor's board... under an alias... posing as
a retardhimself. -
Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically. -
How the fuck can you call his first recruiting class dog shit right now? We've only seen 8 of them play (Pettis, Lenius, Dissly, Gardenhire, Hale, Jones, Baker, Vizcaino) because the other 15 players were redshirting. Additionally, that's 92 total player-years of football for this recruiting class and we've only seen 8 player-years, so effectively only 8.7% of this entire recruiting class.sarktastic said:Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
And even though we've only seen <10% of this recruiting class, I'd say Sidney Jones is already something, being the best CB on the team, and Budda Baker is our best safety, too.
It's way too early to say anything about Petersen's first recruiting class.