Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Ken Griswold has a change of heart
Comments
-
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
His avatar is in line with Kim's pretend pimp-bachelor bullshit.jecornel said:Beezle is grinolds
COOK IT! -
Cleaned it up so Beezle could understand it.CheersWestDawg said:
Taeks 1 2 no one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better. -
I don't have time to use three letters so I just use r.
-
-
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen. -
About 2/3 of this board has been critical of Petersen.beelzebub said:
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.
But don't let that stop you from using terms like "scorched earth". -
Petersen isn't doing anything different this year, unless you're counting the fact that he's not just coming into the job in December. He's on record as saying that this is the system his staff runs, and it's the only system they know and they know it will work.beelzebub said:
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
And Kim has reason enough to dislike Petersen when he says his TBS star-stroking job is a bunch of bullshit that his staff wants no part of. -
Kill yourselfbeelzebub said:
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.CheersWestDawg said:
Takes one to know one.beelzebub said:
U really r an idiot.CheersWestDawg said:He bumped it because he hates Petersen.
If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen. -
Beezlecunt: He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Are you really that dumb or were you born yesterday? Everyone, including Kent (hi Kim) knows that fallacy holds zero water and is just a made up argument for those who get kicked out of Peterman's office. Peterman's first class, which he had less than 2 months to put it together, was ranked 35th and closed out with four 4star kids with an average star ranking of 3. Not spectacular but by any level-headed, impartial observer, a very solid first class, not even taking into account the extremely limited time period.
Comparing Peterman's class to Sark's 5th class is comparing apples to oranges. But you already knew that. Nevermind that Peterman signed as many 4star kids and a had a higher avg star ranking in his first full class than Sark did in his 5th. But if you want to compare apples to apples, Sark's 2009 class was ranked 66th, signed one 4star and averaged 2.5 stars per player. And that's without taking into account the benefit of hindsight, where we now know that the 2009 class is far, far worse than 66th in actual results.
But, I mean, 0-12, right?
