@beelzebub - I know I can't be the only one here that knows this is a LPT account. Nut up dipshits and stand behind the dumpster fire you fuckers turned a once great site into. You motherfuckers suck at everything other than being "the biggest loser" and a sad/creepy/perv KIm.
U r very misguided son let me educate u. It doesn't matter if my account is lpt approved or not,fact remains ur anger, frustration what ever u want to call it needs to be directed towards University administration and coaching staff not a site that covers the team.
I understand most of u wanted Sark gone, 7 wins for multiple years seemed to imply ur program had stalled but Sark had u in an upward trajectory. it was Petersen who severly underperformed. 2014 was supposed to be the year(according to whom? More wins were expected but everyone knew the roster was full of huge holes. Plus who would have expected Sark's 3 top 20 QBs to have zero development?), a seasoned oline(a piss poor Oline recruited and developed by a staff who didn't give a fuck about the Oline), experienced D , there was no excuse for the underperformance(is this a fact?). If he was half the coach y'all crowed about when he was hired at minimum u would have gotten 10 wins(more facts here?). The amateur coaching job in the Arizona game should have made it crystal clear to this board the dude was in way over his head(this must be one of the facts you mentioned).
U guys really had unrealistic expectations from the start, some here even had the termerity (fucking idiot) to call Petersen best coach in country which is laughable (ummm...dude your writing hurts my eyes and brain). Boise was a very good program when he took over. The two previous coaches that tried to make the jump to big leagues completely flamed out, history is ur guide, pay attention!(fuck dude, take some lessons in sentence structure)
Now u overpaid for this guy who couldn't win more games than he lost in conference who just brought u a middling recruiting class(better than any class at UW in about 10 years, but hey that's just my opinion and I realize you only deal in facts)
Kim had nothing to do with any of that but he is absolutely right to air his concerns Fight the real power!
Kim's concern is that he doesn't get to rub elbows with coaches anymore. He doesn't have any pretend, inside info strategically imparted to him by a staff who was more concerned about image than results. Kim doesn't give half a fuck about the success of the UW program. He cares what it does for him and his public image.
You suck worse than ever.
U really r a dumbass, u need things spelled out 4 u dont u? Sark went from 0 to 7 to 9 wins , Petersen dropped down to 7 wins with 1 extra game and is looking at 5 this year.
Middling recruiting class would be sixth in conference, 7th if u rely on rivals When u have no ammunition to make counter arguments make fun of sentence structure. Good job u truly r a great representative 4 this board
@beelzebub - I know I can't be the only one here that knows this is a LPT account. Nut up dipshits and stand behind the dumpster fire you fuckers turned a once great site into. You motherfuckers suck at everything other than being "the biggest loser" and a sad/creepy/perv KIm.
U r very misguided son let me educate u. It doesn't matter if my account is lpt approved or not,fact remains ur anger, frustration what ever u want to call it needs to be directed towards University administration and coaching staff not a site that covers the team.
I understand most of u wanted Sark gone, 7 wins for multiple years seemed to imply ur program had stalled but Sark had u in an upward trajectory. it was Petersen who severly underperformed. 2014 was supposed to be the year(according to whom? More wins were expected but everyone knew the roster was full of huge holes. Plus who would have expected Sark's 3 top 20 QBs to have zero development?), a seasoned oline(a piss poor Oline recruited and developed by a staff who didn't give a fuck about the Oline), experienced D , there was no excuse for the underperformance(is this a fact?). If he was half the coach y'all crowed about when he was hired at minimum u would have gotten 10 wins(more facts here?). The amateur coaching job in the Arizona game should have made it crystal clear to this board the dude was in way over his head(this must be one of the facts you mentioned).
U guys really had unrealistic expectations from the start, some here even had the termerity (fucking idiot) to call Petersen best coach in country which is laughable (ummm...dude your writing hurts my eyes and brain). Boise was a very good program when he took over. The two previous coaches that tried to make the jump to big leagues completely flamed out, history is ur guide, pay attention!(fuck dude, take some lessons in sentence structure)
Now u overpaid for this guy who couldn't win more games than he lost in conference who just brought u a middling recruiting class(better than any class at UW in about 10 years, but hey that's just my opinion and I realize you only deal in facts)
Kim had nothing to do with any of that but he is absolutely right to air his concerns Fight the real power!
Kim's concern is that he doesn't get to rub elbows with coaches anymore. He doesn't have any pretend, inside info strategically imparted to him by a staff who was more concerned about image than results. Kim doesn't give half a fuck about the success of the UW program. He cares what it does for him and his public image.
You suck worse than ever.
U really r a dumbass, u need things spelled out 4 u dont u? Sark went from 0 to 7 to 9 wins , Petersen dropped down to 7 wins with 1 extra game and is looking at 5 this year.
Middling recruiting class would be sixth in conference, 7th if u rely on rivals When u have no ammunition to make counter arguments make fun of sentence structure. Good job u truly r a great representative 4 this board
@beelzebub - I know I can't be the only one here that knows this is a LPT account. Nut up dipshits and stand behind the dumpster fire you fuckers turned a once great site into. You motherfuckers suck at everything other than being "the biggest loser" and a sad/creepy/perv KIm.
U r very misguided son let me educate u. It doesn't matter if my account is lpt approved or not,fact remains ur anger, frustration what ever u want to call it needs to be directed towards University administration and coaching staff not a site that covers the team.
I understand most of u wanted Sark gone, 7 wins for multiple years seemed to imply ur program had stalled but Sark had u in an upward trajectory. it was Petersen who severly underperformed. 2014 was supposed to be the year(according to whom? More wins were expected but everyone knew the roster was full of huge holes. Plus who would have expected Sark's 3 top 20 QBs to have zero development?), a seasoned oline(a piss poor Oline recruited and developed by a staff who didn't give a fuck about the Oline), experienced D , there was no excuse for the underperformance(is this a fact?). If he was half the coach y'all crowed about when he was hired at minimum u would have gotten 10 wins(more facts here?). The amateur coaching job in the Arizona game should have made it crystal clear to this board the dude was in way over his head(this must be one of the facts you mentioned).
U guys really had unrealistic expectations from the start, some here even had the termerity (fucking idiot) to call Petersen best coach in country which is laughable (ummm...dude your writing hurts my eyes and brain). Boise was a very good program when he took over. The two previous coaches that tried to make the jump to big leagues completely flamed out, history is ur guide, pay attention!(fuck dude, take some lessons in sentence structure)
Now u overpaid for this guy who couldn't win more games than he lost in conference who just brought u a middling recruiting class(better than any class at UW in about 10 years, but hey that's just my opinion and I realize you only deal in facts)
Kim had nothing to do with any of that but he is absolutely right to air his concerns Fight the real power!
Kim's concern is that he doesn't get to rub elbows with coaches anymore. He doesn't have any pretend, inside info strategically imparted to him by a staff who was more concerned about image than results. Kim doesn't give half a fuck about the success of the UW program. He cares what it does for him and his public image.
You suck worse than ever.
U really r a dumbass, u need things spelled out 4 u dont u? Sark went from 0 to 7 to 9 wins , Petersen dropped down to 7 wins with 1 extra game and is looking at 5 this year.
Middling recruiting class would be sixth in conference, 7th if u rely on rivals When u have no ammunition to make counter arguments make fun of sentence structure. Good job u truly r a great representative 4 this board
I actually took the time to address some of your points in parenthesis and italics. None of them were fact based.
Sark won eight games with a senior QB and the best running back in the nation. He didn't beat one good team. Petersen won eight games the same way, by beating the bad teams, with the dreck OL and QB situation that Sark left for him.
This wasn't about Sark and Petersen though really. It was about you and the LPT. I addressed that too. I simply couldn't get through it without getting a little distracted by your horrific writing though.
@beelzebub - I know I can't be the only one here that knows this is a LPT account. Nut up dipshits and stand behind the dumpster fire you fuckers turned a once great site into. You motherfuckers suck at everything other than being "the biggest loser" and a sad/creepy/perv KIm.
U r very misguided son let me educate u. It doesn't matter if my account is lpt approved or not,fact remains ur anger, frustration what ever u want to call it needs to be directed towards University administration and coaching staff not a site that covers the team.
I understand most of u wanted Sark gone, 7 wins for multiple years seemed to imply ur program had stalled but Sark had u in an upward trajectory. it was Petersen who severly underperformed. 2014 was supposed to be the year(according to whom? More wins were expected but everyone knew the roster was full of huge holes. Plus who would have expected Sark's 3 top 20 QBs to have zero development?), a seasoned oline(a piss poor Oline recruited and developed by a staff who didn't give a fuck about the Oline), experienced D , there was no excuse for the underperformance(is this a fact?). If he was half the coach y'all crowed about when he was hired at minimum u would have gotten 10 wins(more facts here?). The amateur coaching job in the Arizona game should have made it crystal clear to this board the dude was in way over his head(this must be one of the facts you mentioned).
U guys really had unrealistic expectations from the start, some here even had the termerity (fucking idiot) to call Petersen best coach in country which is laughable (ummm...dude your writing hurts my eyes and brain). Boise was a very good program when he took over. The two previous coaches that tried to make the jump to big leagues completely flamed out, history is ur guide, pay attention!(fuck dude, take some lessons in sentence structure)
Now u overpaid for this guy who couldn't win more games than he lost in conference who just brought u a middling recruiting class(better than any class at UW in about 10 years, but hey that's just my opinion and I realize you only deal in facts)
Kim had nothing to do with any of that but he is absolutely right to air his concerns Fight the real power!
Kim's concern is that he doesn't get to rub elbows with coaches anymore. He doesn't have any pretend, inside info strategically imparted to him by a staff who was more concerned about image than results. Kim doesn't give half a fuck about the success of the UW program. He cares what it does for him and his public image.
You suck worse than ever.
U really r a dumbass, u need things spelled out 4 u dont u? Sark went from 0 to 7 to 9 wins , Petersen dropped down to 7 wins with 1 extra game and is looking at 5 this year.
Middling recruiting class would be sixth in conference, 7th if u rely on rivals When u have no ammunition to make counter arguments make fun of sentence structure. Good job u truly r a great representative 4 this board
100-18
That's about .840.
That's my argument.
He beat Oregon twice, blOwU, VT, and other top 25 teams.
The Pac is tougher than the WAC Mt. Worst so he's not going to do .840 in three years.
You need to worry about Leach getting to .500. Good luck with that pal.
The 2014 UW Football season was very simple ... Cyler Miles ranks highly in the listing of starting QBs to ever take the majority of snaps during the year for downright shittiness. The difference between the team being an 8 to 10 or 11 win team last year starts and ends with the QB position.
The idiots go back and criticize the fake punt call against Stanford. Not the greatest decision in the world. But I get the decision. I get that Petersen was anxious and knew that he wasn't going to get anywhere with his QB and needed to manufacture a score. Of the 2 TDs scored in the game, one was a defensive score from Shaq and the offense had 1 legit drive of the game. Miles threw for 98 yards during the game. The running game had 81 yards on the day. That's symptomatic of an offense without a reasonable QB. Simple execution on an extra point would have made a MASSIVE difference in how that game played out (we'll get to Arizona in a second).
Everybody talks about how great the defense was all year. Yet, the defense didn't always come through like the top unit that everybody talked about. After getting the game into a tie and having all momentum on their side, the defense just needed to get a quick stop to flip the ball back to the offense with a chance to run it on a gassed ASU defense into FG range and the game winning score. Instead, they let ASU walk down the field on them.
Against Arizona, that loss basically boiled down to the team just flat out not executing simple in-game situations including an extra point that rolled back from center and then fumbling the ball when the first objective of the RB in that situation is to not fumble under any situation.
We've heard Petersen talk over and over about culture and change. We've got a strong glimpse from Seven's running that the program was edgy, fast, loose, and probably most importantly, great front runners but shrivel up and hide when the going got tough. There was no such thing as embracing the difficult. There was limited focus on doing the fundamentals right over and over so that when in pressure situations they are just flat out automatic. Fundamentals don't get you on SportsCenter ... they don't get you FREE PUB!!! ... they don't fit with the dude brah culture. Fundamentals do make you great and win championships. If you look at any great player in any sport, they are gifted with a number of different and unique athletic advantages ... but in almost every single case the greatest not only are the most athletically gifted, but also the most fundamentally sound.
Winning is hard. Winning is something you have to be committed to. Winning is finding a way to make the play that the common player wouldn't make. Winning is being prepared for all situations. Winning is embracing the difficult and the process. Winning is stemmed from a hatred of failure/losing. Winning is having a trust and belief in EVERYBODY that is on your team (from the top to the bottom) that they will do their jobs and are all pulling the same rope in the same direction. Winning is the culmination of the hard work that nobody on the outside sees. Winning is what makes you legendary.
Love all the insults I give u the facts and not one loser can argue otherwise Just proves my point u clowns would rather communicate in juvenile pictures than defend this current state of husky football
The 2014 UW Football season was very simple ... Cyler Miles ranks highly in the listing of starting QBs to ever take the majority of snaps during the year for downright shittiness. The difference between the team being an 8 to 10 or 11 win team last year starts and ends with the QB position.
The idiots go back and criticize the fake punt call against Stanford. Not the greatest decision in the world. But I get the decision. I get that Petersen was anxious and knew that he wasn't going to get anywhere with his QB and needed to manufacture a score. Of the 2 TDs scored in the game, one was a defensive score from Shaq and the offense had 1 legit drive of the game. Miles threw for 98 yards during the game. The running game had 81 yards on the day. That's symptomatic of an offense without a reasonable QB. Simple execution on an extra point would have made a MASSIVE difference in how that game played out (we'll get to Arizona in a second).
Everybody talks about how great the defense was all year. Yet, the defense didn't always come through like the top unit that everybody talked about. After getting the game into a tie and having all momentum on their side, the defense just needed to get a quick stop to flip the ball back to the offense with a chance to run it on a gassed ASU defense into FG range and the game winning score. Instead, they let ASU walk down the field on them.
Against Arizona, that loss basically boiled down to the team just flat out not executing simple in-game situations including an extra point that rolled back from center and then fumbling the ball when the first objective of the RB in that situation is to not fumble under any situation.
We've heard Petersen talk over and over about culture and change. We've got a strong glimpse from Seven's running that the program was edgy, fast, loose, and probably most importantly, great front runners but shrivel up and hide when the going got tough. There was no such thing as embracing the difficult. There was limited focus on doing the fundamentals right over and over so that when in pressure situations they are just flat out automatic. Fundamentals don't get you on SportsCenter ... they don't get you FREE PUB!!! ... they don't fit with the dude brah culture. Fundamentals do make you great and win championships. If you look at any great player in any sport, they are gifted with a number of different and unique athletic advantages ... but in almost every single case the greatest not only are the most athletically gifted, but also the most fundamentally sound.
Winning is hard. Winning is something you have to be committed to. Winning is finding a way to make the play that the common player wouldn't make. Winning is being prepared for all situations. Winning is embracing the difficult and the process. Winning is stemmed from a hatred of failure/losing. Winning is having a trust and belief in EVERYBODY that is on your team (from the top to the bottom) that they will do their jobs and are all pulling the same rope in the same direction. Winning is the culmination of the hard work that nobody on the outside sees. Winning is what makes you legendary.
Someone get James Earl Jones on the horn. We need him to voice over the tl,dr post about winning.
U really r a dumbass, u need things spelled out 4 u dont u? Sark went from 0 to 7 to 9 wins , Petersen dropped down to 7 wins with 1 extra game and is looking at 5 this year.
Middling recruiting class would be sixth in conference, 7th if u rely on rivals When u have no ammunition to make counter arguments make fun of sentence structure. Good job u truly r a great representative 4 this board
This place is such a joke. What a bunch of sweatpants generals. Some of us have actual coaching experience. I've been coaching linebackers at the 7th and 8th grade special ed level since 1978.
Comments
It doesn't seem to be a particularly lucrative occupation, especially when you have no prior connection to the university or the sport.
Sark went from 0 to 7 to 9 wins ,
Petersen dropped down to 7 wins with 1 extra game and is looking at 5 this year.
Middling recruiting class would be sixth in conference, 7th if u rely on rivals
When u have no ammunition to make counter arguments make fun of sentence structure.
Good job u truly r a great representative 4 this board
Sark won eight games with a senior QB and the best running back in the nation. He didn't beat one good team. Petersen won eight games the same way, by beating the bad teams, with the dreck OL and QB situation that Sark left for him.
This wasn't about Sark and Petersen though really. It was about you and the LPT. I addressed that too. I simply couldn't get through it without getting a little distracted by your horrific writing though.
That's about .840.
That's my argument.
He beat Oregon twice, blOwU, VT, and other top 25 teams.
The Pac is tougher than the WAC Mt. Worst so he's not going to do .840 in three years.
You need to worry about Leach getting to .500. Good luck with that pal.
The idiots go back and criticize the fake punt call against Stanford. Not the greatest decision in the world. But I get the decision. I get that Petersen was anxious and knew that he wasn't going to get anywhere with his QB and needed to manufacture a score. Of the 2 TDs scored in the game, one was a defensive score from Shaq and the offense had 1 legit drive of the game. Miles threw for 98 yards during the game. The running game had 81 yards on the day. That's symptomatic of an offense without a reasonable QB. Simple execution on an extra point would have made a MASSIVE difference in how that game played out (we'll get to Arizona in a second).
Everybody talks about how great the defense was all year. Yet, the defense didn't always come through like the top unit that everybody talked about. After getting the game into a tie and having all momentum on their side, the defense just needed to get a quick stop to flip the ball back to the offense with a chance to run it on a gassed ASU defense into FG range and the game winning score. Instead, they let ASU walk down the field on them.
Against Arizona, that loss basically boiled down to the team just flat out not executing simple in-game situations including an extra point that rolled back from center and then fumbling the ball when the first objective of the RB in that situation is to not fumble under any situation.
We've heard Petersen talk over and over about culture and change. We've got a strong glimpse from Seven's running that the program was edgy, fast, loose, and probably most importantly, great front runners but shrivel up and hide when the going got tough. There was no such thing as embracing the difficult. There was limited focus on doing the fundamentals right over and over so that when in pressure situations they are just flat out automatic. Fundamentals don't get you on SportsCenter ... they don't get you FREE PUB!!! ... they don't fit with the dude brah culture. Fundamentals do make you great and win championships. If you look at any great player in any sport, they are gifted with a number of different and unique athletic advantages ... but in almost every single case the greatest not only are the most athletically gifted, but also the most fundamentally sound.
Winning is hard. Winning is something you have to be committed to. Winning is finding a way to make the play that the common player wouldn't make. Winning is being prepared for all situations. Winning is embracing the difficult and the process. Winning is stemmed from a hatred of failure/losing. Winning is having a trust and belief in EVERYBODY that is on your team (from the top to the bottom) that they will do their jobs and are all pulling the same rope in the same direction. Winning is the culmination of the hard work that nobody on the outside sees. Winning is what makes you legendary.
Last year wins 10 maybe 11 games with Keith Price. Stanford, Arizona, and Okie lite if we played them in whatever bowl.
Are you new here?
At the end of the day ...
Pealing the layers of the onion back ...
Winning is hard ...
Items that should work their way into the lexicon of the The World According to Tequilla Board.