Hillary has been hiding documents for decades...
Comments
-
A vote for Hillary's opponent is a vote against women, and it means you are sexist. That's what I've heard.
-
We can find the emails. Don't worry!
-
... and I heard your boss, Obubba, doesn't like Bubba.NSA_Dawg said:We can find the emails. Don't worry!
-
That's ok. I've been a racist for 6 years now.greenblood said:A vote for Hillary's opponent is a vote against women, and it means you are sexist. That's what I've heard.
I couldn't decide between that one and this one...
-
I heard some Hillary apologist talking about how you can't write her off because the Clinton's have survived so many scandals and the people just keep ignoring them
I thought - she ain't Bill
People like Bill and didn't give a shit about what he did because he did a pretty good job or times were pretty good however you want to look at it.
I don't think Hillary measures very high on the likability meter. These attacks are not from the Republicans. The Democrats don't think she can win. -
Wait what? The attacks aren't from the Republicans? I mean I was with you until you said that. It's the Republicans congressional committee that subpoenaed these emails. And keeps reviving Benghazi.RaceBannon said:I heard some Hillary apologist talking about how you can't write her off because the Clinton's have survived so many scandals and the people just keep ignoring them
I thought - she ain't Bill
People like Bill and didn't give a shit about what he did because he did a pretty good job or times were pretty good however you want to look at it.
I don't think Hillary measures very high on the likability meter. These attacks are not from the Republicans. The Democrats don't think she can win.
Keep throwing shit and see what sticks. -
If by reviving you mean proving that she lied about the you tube video, then I guess that's an "attack" although I'm not sure why democrats would support the bullshit that Obama and Hillary pulled including an apology ad in Pakistan after the attack.
And if its an attack to prove that she broke the law with her emails, then yes but again not sure how that is a partisan issue. The rule of law should be bi partisan.
The White House hanging her out to dry on the emails and the leaks on other issues were what I was referring to.
But you're just here to combat republican lies you're not really a democrat stooge and you think both parties suck
Allegedly -
You talk like you've been around since the 70s. When have you ever known the rule of law to be bi partisan? From Watergate to Clinton's deal. Democrats screaming about patriot act being unconstitutional and Republicans screaming about obamacare being unconstitutional.RaceBannon said:If by reviving you mean proving that she lied about the you tube video, then I guess that's an "attack" although I'm not sure why democrats would support the bullshit that Obama and Hillary pulled including an apology ad in Pakistan after the attack.
And if its an attack to prove that she broke the law with her emails, then yes but again not sure how that is a partisan issue. The rule of law should be bi partisan.
The White House hanging her out to dry on the emails and the leaks on other issues were what I was referring to.
But you're just here to combat republican lies you're not really a democrat stooge and you think both parties suck
Allegedly
HTH -
*gurgle *
-
I don't understand how being on welfare makes you an expert on emailsAZDuck said:As a duck who has drawn a federal paycheck - this is a serious problem. Federal email systems are centrally backed up and archived so that emails can be retrieved for investigations and FOIA requests. If the SecState's email was located on a private server, this means that her communications aren't available. This is a clear violation of Federal policy. And it should be an issue if Hillary decides to run for President.
