Guliani is backtracking
Comments
-
1) O'Reilly is the same as your news source.
2) yes those are facts the debt went up that much. But let's look at why. Part of it is from additional tax cuts and the stimulus package, we are about a trillion in spending there. The rest is from the wars (which is partially him for extending them for so long), reduced revenues from the recession, and increased welfare from the recession. The recession started a full year before he was elected. I dont stroke Obama, I just dont make up shit and pretend all of the $8 trillion is on Obama. That's just FS.
3) yes and those things you rip Bush on, carried over to Obama. So you remember losing 800k jobs a month? The TARP bailout? Or just expect Obama to fix that on day 1.
The funny part is watching videos of the same news sources blasting Obama got the debt and recession in 2009 and then blaming the recession in 2001 on Clinton. Even tho it started well into Bush's term. That's my point. You parrot right wing talking points. -
1) *gurgle*.. *slurp*...*gurgle*. I think we've already shown you have no clue how to understand even the most basic of news sources including govt data (O'Reilly is now = to govt data...you should tell him and make his ego even bigger)...
2) So you (finally) agree its reality, but now its just not 'fair'. How liberal of you. He's the President...he can cancel/expand/add programs as he sees fit as he has in working with Congress (go look at the tab for Obamacare with the "taxes" that pay for it now being pushed out/repealed/etc...funny how your 501c fails to mention that...and its only going to climb). In addition, the economy should be booming as was beaten through your weak talking points in a previous thread. It hasn't because of his policies, so govt revenues haven't grown like they should. *Gurgle* and *slurp* away as you keep apologizing for it and explaining it away...
3) Really? We are still sending one-time checks out to people? Effin moron. And Obama quadrupled down on the medicare drug benefit with that ACA, but its great for Obama and bad for Bush. And yes, its been 6 YEARS, yet we are still running half a trillion $ deficits a year. Lemming.
Its truly is amazing you keep hitting reply... -
8 years into Bush and we ran a $1.5 trillion deficit. What's your point? Even Romney said 2020 was the best case for a balanced budget.HoustonHusky said:1) *gurgle*.. *slurp*...*gurgle*. I think we've already shown you have no clue how to understand even the most basic of news sources including govt data (O'Reilly is now = to govt data...you should tell him and make his ego even bigger)...
2) So you (finally) agree its reality, but now its just not 'fair'. How liberal of you. He's the President...he can cancel/expand/add programs as he sees fit as he has in working with Congress (go look at the tab for Obamacare with the "taxes" that pay for it now being pushed out/repealed/etc...funny how your 501c fails to mention that...and its only going to climb). In addition, the economy should be booming as was beaten through your weak talking points in a previous thread. It hasn't because of his policies, so govt revenues haven't grown like they should. *Gurgle* and *slurp* away as you keep apologizing for it and explaining it away...
3) Really? We are still sending one-time checks out to people? Effin moron. And Obama quadrupled down on the medicare drug benefit with that ACA, but its great for Obama and bad for Bush. And yes, its been 6 YEARS, yet we are still running half a trillion $ deficits a year. Lemming.
Its truly is amazing you keep hitting reply...
It would be nice if you skipped backed into reality. -
-
Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.
I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*. -
Houston is killing you Honda.
-
Interesting. Didn't know this was a contest. But he is much better at distorting facts then me, yes.Doogles said:Houston is killing you Honda.
-
And Bush sending checks directly to people didn't institutionalize spending? At least Obama made people work for their money.HoustonHusky said:Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.
I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*. -
I think the committee has seen enough
-
Every time I think we've hit rock bottom on your intelligence you prove it goes even lower with a gem like this...2001400ex said:
And Bush sending checks directly to people didn't institutionalize spending? At least Obama made people work for their money.HoustonHusky said:Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.
I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*.
Do you have a clue what you are talking about? The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 was a one-time "tax rebate" that in essence was the IRS mailing a check out to everybody ONLY ONE TIME. Institutionalizing means growing government bureaucracy and permanent programs (i.e. years and years of spending). And I'm glad you think all the folks with Obama-phones are "working" for their free money.
God I hope you aren't a UW grad...
