New Husky Fan Podcast Episode
Comments
-
A number of them...plus a two dads line from chest.RaceBannon said:Have I ever got a shout out? #Drunk
-
Just wanted to chime in and say great podcast. Finally got around to listening to it and it's nice to hear football talk during the offseason. Keep up the good work. Enjoyed the worst local news guy stuff lol. Not sure why anyone goes to Doogman when you have the podcast and the boards here.
-
"He was a coin flip away"
-
Definitely one of ybe and I've listened to 90% of your podcasts since July of 2013.
Of course I am drunk off Jack and Jack n Cokes.. Cracked up at the end after the death2duck and puppy comments -
Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
-
Did Mike Leach tell you this?beelzebub said:Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
-
Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......beelzebub said:Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.
For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5. -
This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.HuskyInAZ said:
Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......beelzebub said:Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.
For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have. -
Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?beelzebub said:
This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.HuskyInAZ said:
Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......beelzebub said:Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.
For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have. -
Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?haie said:
Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?beelzebub said:
This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting.HuskyInAZ said:
Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......beelzebub said:Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.
For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.
i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.
