Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fetters lists the 12 least "important" recruits from the class

I'm sure Myles Rice appreciates a 400 lb man listing him as the least important recruit from the class.

Also noteworthy was Hilbers, Roberts, and Adams at the bottom of the list and Carty is apparently one of the top 12 most important recruits.

Methinks F3 doesn't understand what "important" means
«1

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    You're kidding right?
  • DugtheDoog
    DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180

    I'm sure Myles Rice appreciates a 400 lb man listing him as the least important recruit from the class.

    Also noteworthy was Hilbers, Roberts, and Adams at the bottom of the list and Carty is apparently one of the top 12 most important recruits.

    Methinks F3 doesn't understand what "important" means

    Only the first 400 counts?

  • DeepSeaZ
    DeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    Is this real? What fat classy fuck does that?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    hmmm.. and all this time I thought tLPT, as fucked up as they are, actually liked UW.

    I guess I made another mistake.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    I'm sure Myles Rice appreciates a 400 lb man listing him as the least important recruit from the class.

    Also noteworthy was Hilbers, Roberts, and Adams at the bottom of the list and Carty is apparently one of the top 12 most important recruits.

    Methinks F3 doesn't understand what "important" means

    I doth think that the King of Nachos hath been brainwashed by Seven's gleeful disregard for the importance of bodyguards for the nobles on the football field
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Someone needs to tell @CFetters_Nacho_Lover that recruits families read these boreds!
  • claycha
    claycha Member Posts: 662
    hate to point out what may be obvious but... YOU paid to read that drivel
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,198 Founders Club
    what would be the point of such a list, other than to degrade Petersen?
  • BayDawg
    BayDawg Member Posts: 1,623
    Those morons are brainwashed by triple chins.

    The three OL are three of the least important recruits? Where oh where would they have gotten that idea?
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,501
    Here's the list in order from least important to most important (according to F3)
    24. Ryles Mice
    23. Jake Hilbers
    22. Jusstisss Warrrrren
    21. Who the hell names their kid Henry?
    20. Nike Meal
    19. Big Black-Kock
    18. Eaton Beavers
    17. Beavis Buttlett
    16. Vernon"Trey" Adams
    15. Cyler Manu
    14. Will Dissly Sterk
    13. Dick McCoy

    Stay tuned for the top 12 bottoms
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2015
    Have they ever run a list like this before? They never bash the kids. Honestly though I could see them doing this in rating potential recruits, but to do it with kids that just signed is fucked up and holds zero value. I hope Petersen just toys with these guys at pressers. If I'm Petersen I put this list on the bulletin board and in the weight room. Plus, if I'm on that list I don't answer a single question from those guys my entire UW career.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Seriously how can OL with MULTIPLE PAC offers be low on a recruiting list?

    And not that I'm for bashing a kid, but I do recall that we got a verbal from a slightly built slot WR that many weren't overly impressed with and that player is in the top 12?

    What I would like to see at the end of this list is not a ranking of the players themselves, but I'd like to see the 1-24 list based on what position said player plays. That will tell you all you need to know about the LPT.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    I'm really curious what he wrote about them.

    I mean, he didn't just put up a list like this, did he? He actually explained why these kids are the least important commits, right?
  • steelheader2
    steelheader2 Member Posts: 373
    They are the least important commits for 2015 season not really overall
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    This is why people are leaving in droves. Anyone who spends months telling people not to post bad things on recruiting threads and then rips off the most important players in the class is the epitome of classless. I almost feel bad for how moronic the leadership is with the LPT. The business is going down without any inside info which leads them to have to be real journalists, which of course they are not.

    Sad slow death, but i wouldn't mind getting back in there to be banned a few more times.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    How the fuck do these clowns even have press credentials?

    Anybody who ranks 6'0" 200 LBs above 4-star O-linemen doesn't know shit.
  • ScroteDawg
    ScroteDawg Member Posts: 238
    Methinks all that Sark semen has gone to their brains.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    TTJ said:

    How the fuck do these clowns even have press credentials?

    Anybody who ranks 6'0" 200 LBs above 4-star O-linemen doesn't know shit.

    Take it to the OL Bored!!
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,720 Founders Club
    i think banana is wooshing us. or the list counts down from the top and by default they are the "least" important.

    Otherwise credentials should be revoked.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,501
    No whoosh. What F3 is doing is listing the players who are most likely to immediately impact the team next year. First of all, this is retarded because 2/3 of these guys will redshirt. How do you rank order 16-18 kids who will be doing the exact same thing next year? Why is a redshirting Myles Rice ranked 11 spots lower than a redshirting Kyler Manu? It makes no sense. Second, he named this list the "most important signees of 2015" which is the worst title you could possibly have.
  • ScroteDawg
    ScroteDawg Member Posts: 238
    Doogles said:

    i think banana is wooshing us. or the list counts down from the top and by default they are the "least" important.

    Otherwise credentials should be revoked.

    It doesn't matter which end of the list you start on, having Roberts and Adams that low given the shit state of our OL is SarkFS.
  • DugtheDoog
    DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    If F3 did this last year, no doubt Dissly would have been in Rice's spot. Which really shows how much they actually know.
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    Hey, they are all in on having CP hate them. If there was any question before, this will just solidify their ranking as being a joke to the staff and the players. Another brilliant business move to piss off an already edgy coach about your site/business.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Doogles said:

    No whoosh. What F3 is doing is listing the players who are most likely to immediately impact the team next year. First of all, this is retarded because 2/3 of these guys will redshirt. How do you rank order 16-18 kids who will be doing the exact same thing next year? Why is a redshirting Myles Rice ranked 11 spots lower than a redshirting Kyler Manu? It makes no sense. Second, he named this list the "most important signees of 2015" which is the worst title you could possibly have.

    I'll probably get bashed, but Fetters isn't being quite as fucktarded as you led to believe.

    It's still dumb to rank it that way, probably better off writing an article titled "Recruits most likely to Suit up this season" and omit the list of guys he thinks will redshirt.

    But in the context you describe you can see his thought process is something like:

    Rice is greyshirting so by far the least impact. You have to put the guys in some order if you are going to make this fucked up list, but he's essentially saying the two OL are going to RS (probably true) but Trey would most likely play ahead of Roberts if one was needed (fair).

    Not trying to defend the way the article is structured or the way Fetters is doing it, but it's not a fireable offense. Not worth the HH pitchfork gathering you created.

    If this is what he was 'essentially trying to say' he should have said it. He didn't. He took the low road as if Scout's rankings actually mean shit.
  • ScroteDawg
    ScroteDawg Member Posts: 238

    Now more than ever:

    5hundy, you gave kim money. I gave the little queef money...Most here gave them money. It's the little Oliver twists here that are afraid the poorage will dry up should they leave dogman and play here full time.

    It's you guys that still give them money then come on here and beat them (the guys from dawgman) down. You guys are the very problem. Nut the fuck up and cut Kimmy's umbilical butt chord. It actually might be the 1st step for a lot of you in becoming a man. Your wives might even notice a new manhood and stop fucking your friends...who knows they might actually sit on your collective sorry excuses for weiners. Got to start somewhere slice, cocker...be men, stop paying dogman.

    The irony of that puppy rant never fades.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,197 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    Someone needs to tell @CFetters_Nacho_Lover that recruits families read these boreds!

    Huh?

    And FREE PUB!!!!!