Fetters lists the 12 least "important" recruits from the class
Comments
-
i think banana is wooshing us. or the list counts down from the top and by default they are the "least" important.
Otherwise credentials should be revoked. -
No whoosh. What F3 is doing is listing the players who are most likely to immediately impact the team next year. First of all, this is retarded because 2/3 of these guys will redshirt. How do you rank order 16-18 kids who will be doing the exact same thing next year? Why is a redshirting Myles Rice ranked 11 spots lower than a redshirting Kyler Manu? It makes no sense. Second, he named this list the "most important signees of 2015" which is the worst title you could possibly have.
-
It doesn't matter which end of the list you start on, having Roberts and Adams that low given the shit state of our OL is SarkFS.Doogles said:i think banana is wooshing us. or the list counts down from the top and by default they are the "least" important.
Otherwise credentials should be revoked. -
I'll probably get bashed, but Fetters isn't being quite as fucktarded as you led to believe.bananasnblondes said:No whoosh. What F3 is doing is listing the players who are most likely to immediately impact the team next year. First of all, this is retarded because 2/3 of these guys will redshirt. How do you rank order 16-18 kids who will be doing the exact same thing next year? Why is a redshirting Myles Rice ranked 11 spots lower than a redshirting Kyler Manu? It makes no sense. Second, he named this list the "most important signees of 2015" which is the worst title you could possibly have.
It's still dumb to rank it that way, probably better off writing an article titled "Recruits most likely to Suit up this season" and omit the list of guys he thinks will redshirt.
But in the context you describe you can see his thought process is something like:
Rice is greyshirting so by far the least impact. You have to put the guys in some order if you are going to make this fucked up list, but he's essentially saying the two OL are going to RS (probably true) but Trey would most likely play ahead of Roberts if one was needed (fair).
Not trying to defend the way the article is structured or the way Fetters is doing it, but it's not a fireable offense. Not worth the HH pitchfork gathering you created.
-
If F3 did this last year, no doubt Dissly would have been in Rice's spot. Which really shows how much they actually know.
-
Hey, they are all in on having CP hate them. If there was any question before, this will just solidify their ranking as being a joke to the staff and the players. Another brilliant business move to piss off an already edgy coach about your site/business.
-
If this is what he was 'essentially trying to say' he should have said it. He didn't. He took the low road as if Scout's rankings actually mean shit.Doogles said:
I'll probably get bashed, but Fetters isn't being quite as fucktarded as you led to believe.bananasnblondes said:No whoosh. What F3 is doing is listing the players who are most likely to immediately impact the team next year. First of all, this is retarded because 2/3 of these guys will redshirt. How do you rank order 16-18 kids who will be doing the exact same thing next year? Why is a redshirting Myles Rice ranked 11 spots lower than a redshirting Kyler Manu? It makes no sense. Second, he named this list the "most important signees of 2015" which is the worst title you could possibly have.
It's still dumb to rank it that way, probably better off writing an article titled "Recruits most likely to Suit up this season" and omit the list of guys he thinks will redshirt.
But in the context you describe you can see his thought process is something like:
Rice is greyshirting so by far the least impact. You have to put the guys in some order if you are going to make this fucked up list, but he's essentially saying the two OL are going to RS (probably true) but Trey would most likely play ahead of Roberts if one was needed (fair).
Not trying to defend the way the article is structured or the way Fetters is doing it, but it's not a fireable offense. Not worth the HH pitchfork gathering you created. -
Now more than ever:
5hundy, you gave kim money. I gave the little queef money...Most here gave them money. It's the little Oliver twists here that are afraid the poorage will dry up should they leave dogman and play here full time.
It's you guys that still give them money then come on here and beat them (the guys from dawgman) down. You guys are the very problem. Nut the fuck up and cut Kimmy's umbilical butt chord. It actually might be the 1st step for a lot of you in becoming a man. Your wives might even notice a new manhood and stop fucking your friends...who knows they might actually sit on your collective sorry excuses for weiners. Got to start somewhere slice, cocker...be men, stop paying dogman. -
The irony of that puppy rant never fades.RoadDawg55 said:Now more than ever:
5hundy, you gave kim money. I gave the little queef money...Most here gave them money. It's the little Oliver twists here that are afraid the poorage will dry up should they leave dogman and play here full time.
It's you guys that still give them money then come on here and beat them (the guys from dawgman) down. You guys are the very problem. Nut the fuck up and cut Kimmy's umbilical butt chord. It actually might be the 1st step for a lot of you in becoming a man. Your wives might even notice a new manhood and stop fucking your friends...who knows they might actually sit on your collective sorry excuses for weiners. Got to start somewhere slice, cocker...be men, stop paying dogman. -
Huh?dnc said:Someone needs to tell @CFetters_Nacho_Lover that recruits families read these boreds!
And FREE PUB!!!!!
