Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Growing chorus of elite media now say Peterman blew Adams recruitment

first Kim, now Groz...
«134567

Comments

  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,865 Founders Club
    Oregon, UCLA, and Texas were all way more likely than Washington. Two title contenders loaded with talent and 1 of the biggest national brands with more exposure than any other school with a guaranteed starting spot.

    Yeah, Adams was knocking down the door.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    90sDawg said:

    You don't need a 1 year starter when your trying to build a program that will struggle to win 8 games next year no matter who the QB is. Give the reps to KJCS or Browning. No more reps for Miles and certainly not a one year transfer starter.

    Huskies are building for 2016 and beyond - Adams does nothing to help that.

    We got the in state Adams that we need - his name is Trey.

    this

  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,939 Founders Club

    first Kim, now Groz...

    I'm still waiting waiting what other elite media types like Softy and Gasman have to say.
  • Hippopeteamus
    Hippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958
    edited February 2015
    I'm fairly sure a coach can't contact a potential transfer, the player has to contact the school. I doubt Adams ever attempted to contact UW.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737

    first Kim, now Groz...

    Oh the horror. Groz? He doesn't watch college football?
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    Those clowns are unbelievable. Oregon's returning talent on the outside and at RB is rediculous. I don't think Oregon has ever been this deep at the skill poisitions. I think Adams realized if he can score 50+ agianst D1 teams with Eastern's talent, the sky is the limit with what Oregon has.

    UCLA and Texas I'd imagine were intriguing. But neither school offers the weapons that Oregon has. the one argument I'd make though, is that UCLA at least provides a better chance at winning since they actually have a defense.