Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

BOOM - Vernon Adams To Oregon

1235789

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,959 Founders Club

    Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?

    *snap* *gurgle* or *pop*

    Another cute on liner from Tommy Hill
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    AZDuck said:

    Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?

    *snap* *gurgle* or *pop*

    @bananasnblondes this made me LOL, because I always root against the kids
    This is hard for some people...
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    I think there are valid questions with Adams, but saying this means the Duck's have failed at QB development is wishful thinking. Lockie likely sucks. Mahallak is going to be a redshirt freshman coming off an injury and Waller will be a true freshman and is considered raw by the TBSers. Adams is a bridge guy for a team that wants to win another Pac 12 title instead of going through growing pains with a new QB. Great pick up for Oregon.

    Adams is a good pickup, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't show up in Eugene until July, he still has to graduate from EWU. Oregon losses a bunch of OLs and defenders. I think they have 6 returners on both sides. I think they'll still be good, but 10-2 is their ceiling in my opinion with Losses @Sparty and @Stanford. I don't think this Duck team is good enough to simply blow the doors off of teams like ASU, SC or UW, either. Just looking at the talent I think this may be the weakest Duck team since some of Chip's earliest versions, especially on defense.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?

    *snap* *gurgle* or *pop*

    Another cute on liner from Tommy Hill
    Hey cutie ;)
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    Doogles said:

    It's complete dooging to call this move by Helf a failure. Adams can ball and immediately helps Oregon. In the limited snaps I saw Lockie play, he was clearly not ready for primetime and shitting his pants. I don't know anything about that Mahalak guy but Adams can make throws in tight windows. Oregon's offense usually has someone streaking downfield open by 10 yards.

    True he is not as good of a runner as Mariota, but he is good enough. If anything it means more touches for Freeman--who is incredible--Tyner, and whatever 5 star Running Back they have riding pine over there.

    Darren Thomas wasn't very fast either. Vernon Adams is like Darren Thomas, but more lethal through he air. If there was one area where Mariota lacked, it was throwing in tight windows. Adams gives you that, while it makes up some for the lost of Mariota's feet, there's never going to be another Mariota at Oregon for atleast the next 20 years. Mariota is a once in a generation quarterback for most schools.

    Adams is the best that Oregon could have done right now. Oregon hasn't developed QB poorly as much as a lot of their future options transferred elsewhere when they realized how great Mariota was. Brain Bennett wasn't great, but he was serviceable. He won Oregon a few games while Darren Thomas was injured, including a nice road win at UCLA.

    Jake Rodriguez then transferred. Now he wasn't as good as Bennett, and was actually behind Locke on the depth chart, but he has much better measurables and thus a higher ceiling. Many thought he would actually overtake Locke if he stayed.

    There are disadvantages to having a solidified heisman QB or RBs, as some of the quality depth behind them won't stay because they can get playing time somewhere else. Don't be surprised if Oregon loses some high quality backs next year, because who wants to be 4th in line behind Freeman, Tyner, and Griffin? That's also not counting Lovette, Merritt, or Tony James who redshirted last year. I'm sure one or two will play receiver, but nonetheless.......
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,239 Standard Supporter

    Maybe it's just abundance, but I find it fascinating how some of you are more excited about a potential Oregon drop off than a potential rise in Husky football. Hate to break it to you, but even if Oregon flounders, Stanford is still better than you, and Kal (crazy I know) is improving, and not that far behind you. After that, there's 4 teams in the South that are better than UW. Oregon falling, would be sure nice for you to see, but unless you get your shit together, it's not going to help you one bit.

    Having a realistic shot at beating Oregon is what gets people excited (because nothing else matters).

    You Ducks are getting nervous because:

    - Warshington is actually serious about football and has a good coach

    - Kelly is gone and the replacement is coasting off of his success.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited February 2015


    I think there are valid questions with Adams, but saying this means the Duck's have failed at QB development is wishful thinking. Lockie likely sucks. Mahallak is going to be a redshirt freshman coming off an injury and Waller will be a true freshman and is considered raw by the TBSers. Adams is a bridge guy for a team that wants to win another Pac 12 title instead of going through growing pains with a new QB. Great pick up for Oregon.

    Adams is a good pickup, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't show up in Eugene until July, he still has to graduate from EWU. Oregon losses a bunch of OLs and defenders. I think they have 6 returners on both sides. I think they'll still be good, but 10-2 is their ceiling in my opinion with Losses @Sparty and @Stanford. I don't think this Duck team is good enough to simply blow the doors off of teams like ASU, SC or UW, either. Just looking at the talent I think this may be the weakest Duck team since some of Chip's earliest versions, especially on defense.
    I think ASU, UCLA, AZ, and USC are huge threats to Oregon next year. My problem with Stanford is that now without Montgomery, they have absolutely nobody on the outside that can threaten teams. They also still lack the bruising tailback needed in their system, maybe a year from now it will be different, but I'm thinking of next year only. UW's offense isn't scaring anybody, Kal is still a year away from challenging the upper North, and WSU and OSU are still WSU and OSU. Oregon is making the PAC 12 title game next year, but the champ could definitely come from the South.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    @BallSacked - early days to forecast how Oregon does this fall.

    Adams graduates from EWU on June 13 and will be in Eugene on June 14. There are those who think that Oregon's DL will actually be *better* next year, and that the OL should be about the same given that we play the OL in platoon fashion. I have lots of confidence in our line coaches, either way. Adams gives me confidence that Oregon will have a QB capable of managing the game next fall, and who will be able to distribute the ball to the very talented players in the backfield.

  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468

    Maybe it's just abundance, but I find it fascinating how some of you are more excited about a potential Oregon drop off than a potential rise in Husky football. Hate to break it to you, but even if Oregon flounders, Stanford is still better than you, and Kal (crazy I know) is improving, and not that far behind you. After that, there's 4 teams in the South that are better than UW. Oregon falling, would be sure nice for you to see, but unless you get your shit together, it's not going to help you one bit.

    Having a realistic shot at beating Oregon is what gets people excited (because nothing else matters).

    You Ducks are getting nervous because:

    - Warshington is actually serious about football and has a good coach

    - Kelly is gone and the replacement is coasting off of his success.
    Disagree.

    Peterman had a very mixed first year at UW. I guess the argument is that he kind of wrote off year one as rebuilding, but I don't understand the logic that goes into that.

    I haven't seen any significant indicators of regression by Helfrich.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    AZDuck said:

    @BallSacked - early days to forecast how Oregon does this fall.

    Adams graduates from EWU on June 13 and will be in Eugene on June 14. There are those who think that Oregon's DL will actually be *better* next year, and that the OL should be about the same given that we play the OL in platoon fashion. I have lots of confidence in our line coaches, either way. Adams gives me confidence that Oregon will have a QB capable of managing the game next fall, and who will be able to distribute the ball to the very talented players in the backfield.

    I'm going to wait to see if Canton is as good as advertised, he'll be a freshman afterall. Our defensive backs will be young and inexperienced. The biggest worry I have though, is for the third year in a row, Oregon will have the worst linebackers in D1.