Griswold already focusing on next year
He also wants to point out that he expects a top 15 class next year...even though the in-state crop aren't supposed to be as good and we're supposedly going to take less teen boys. He's already laying the groundwork to call next year a disappointment.
Methinks that he is extremely butthurt after Peterman nearly laughed at every question he asked.
Comments
-
The fans are PISSED about this recruiting class.
-
The narrative has moved from "this isn't the WAC anymore". So he signs a top 25 class with balance, lock down the state and no "sizzle" and the concern is that he can't recruit Cali like Grandmaster Sarkdashian. And before you little twisters start spinning, I said there are concerns; I never said he can't. It's time to learn the difference, maybe talk a walk and gain some perspective.
Lot of twisters out there. -
Just curious, how many "top-15 classes" did his man crush sign while at UW?
It's so obvious that he was grinding his teeth and seething over the fence that Petersen built around the state. Oh how the sand must have chafed kim when Benning Potoa'e committed to UW, and said that he would be elsewhere if floppy tits was still the coach. Potoa'e is just this year's version of Budda and McGary. -
Of course he's focusing on next year. He
jizzed in his pantsgot really excited when he realized that there is afresh cropnew group ofteen boyspotential student-athletes tostalkcoverwrite stories about. -
I'm sure you're right and the thought occurs to me how difficult is it to conjure up a decent question, especially in a field he's supposed to know something about. I bet any one of us could do it. His outright incompetence just never ceases to amaze me.DugtheDoog said:Again, he has to reiterate that this class was "not spectacular", especially compared to Sark.
He also wants to point out that he expects a top 15 class next year...even though the in-state crop aren't supposed to be as good and we're supposedly going to take less teen boys. He's already laying the groundwork to call next year a disappointment.
Methinks that he is extremely butthurt after Peterman nearly laughed at every question he asked. -
I would like to see posted a Q for Kim: Kim, when I look at the Scout database for 2010, it still shows 31 in the class and we all know they don't all appear on the 2010 roster. Is there any chance we can have the UW score and ranking recalculated for accuracy so just for fun, we can compare Peterman's second class with Sark's second?
-
Such a question would earn one a timeout and stern warning.sarktastic said:I would like to see posted a Q for Kim: Kim, when I look at the Scout database for 2010, it still shows 31 in the class and we all know they don't all appear on the 2010 roster. Is there any chance we can have the UW score and ranking recalculated for accuracy so just for fun, we can compare Peterman's second class with Sark's second?
-
SInce when does Kim believe in warnings, regardless of how stern?DerekJohnson said:
Such a question would earn one a timeout and stern warning.sarktastic said:I would like to see posted a Q for Kim: Kim, when I look at the Scout database for 2010, it still shows 31 in the class and we all know they don't all appear on the 2010 roster. Is there any chance we can have the UW score and ranking recalculated for accuracy so just for fun, we can compare Peterman's second class with Sark's second?
-
I caught the first 30 seconds or so of that shit show before switching over to Sandmeyer. All I heard was this exchange.
Shockey: So I hear the Huskies have a great class this year right?
KG: Nahhhh...but do you know who did?!? Sark down at USC!! -
Does anyone else think KG sounds eerily similar to this guy when he's talking to recruits?
-
Kim actually kind of reminds me of Little Carmine in The Sopranos.
-
Kim reminds me of a huge underachieving alcoholic faggot.
-
What would it take to get some haxx0rs to take that site down?
-
Caught another part of the show where Ektard proudly bragged that Gaskin "told me to not call that much but whenever I did, he always picked up!"
-
If those guys shared a brain, why not ask your readers to submit questions? They'd accomplish two things: their readers feel like they have access and the dopes have informed questions to ask.
-
2010 class was #10!!!!Passion said:Just curious, how many "top-15 classes" did his man crush sign while at UW?
It's so obvious that he was grinding his teeth and seething over the fence that Petersen built around the state. Oh how the sand must have chafed kim when Benning Potoa'e committed to UW, and said that he would be elsewhere if floppy tits was still the coach. Potoa'e is just this year's version of Budda and McGary.
And it turned out to be a AWFUL class, I mean just terrible as the re-rank showed. -
2010 was #10 on scout because we signed like 35 players and scout counted 2 guys that didn't even sign. There were a ton of 2 stars in that class and the star average was pathetic.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
2010 class was #10!!!!Passion said:Just curious, how many "top-15 classes" did his man crush sign while at UW?
It's so obvious that he was grinding his teeth and seething over the fence that Petersen built around the state. Oh how the sand must have chafed kim when Benning Potoa'e committed to UW, and said that he would be elsewhere if floppy tits was still the coach. Potoa'e is just this year's version of Budda and McGary.
And it turned out to be a AWFUL class, I mean just terrible as the re-rank showed.
On a Kim note, somebody over there posted that Petersen has shown that he can recruit. Kim's retort was "The people I've been getting texts and emails from today don't agree with you"
How the fuck has the university not clamped down on this little faggot and stripped him of his press credentials? -
Kim is a moron, but why do some of you get so butthurt over his criticisms of Petersen? We know why he does it and it won't stop until Petersen wins the PAC 12. It might not even stop then.
-
Would be deleted and gone with no warningDerekJohnson said:
Such a question would earn one a timeout and stern warning.sarktastic said:I would like to see posted a Q for Kim: Kim, when I look at the Scout database for 2010, it still shows 31 in the class and we all know they don't all appear on the 2010 roster. Is there any chance we can have the UW score and ranking recalculated for accuracy so just for fun, we can compare Peterman's second class with Sark's second?
-
I don't think criticism is connected to how many games or championships Chris Peterson wins or doesn't win at UW.RoadDawg55 said:Kim is a moron, but why do some of you get so butthurt over his criticisms of Petersen? We know why he does it and it won't stop until Petersen wins the PAC 12. It might not even stop then.
It is the lack of insider (mis)information Ken Griswold can offer his subscribers.
Unfortunately for K-Grizzle, Peterson doesn't give a flying F about any appearances of Dawgman.com's relevance.
-
Perhaps the financially strapped one is accepting coffee cups from a 'new money' wealthy one with a vested interest in seeing Washington and Peterman both fail. Somebody who walks up to that Washington fence with bolt cutters in hand.
(no, bettlebutt, not Leach)
