Colin Cowherd
Comments
-
Lots of people like to talk about all the times Cowherd is wrong
-
Does anyone know the last time an NFL team lost a playoff game when they lost turnover -3? I know the Jets turned the ball over 5 time in 1983 and beat the Raiders, but the Raiders also turned it over 5 times and some team had to win.
The GB game did not need anything extra ordinary (like the onside kick) even with the -2 difference.
Winning games when you lose turnovers -3 is really difficult, and the Seahawks did it. The Seahawks tried to give that game to the Packers, and the Packers were not good enough to take it. -
I was bored, so I decided to look at what ESPN's so-called experts are predicting.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/12244977/super-bowl-xlix-predictions-espn-staff-picks-big-game
Dan Graziano's "assessment" is FS.
Dan Graziano, ESPN New York Giants reporter
Patriots 26, Seahawks 17 -- Last year's Seahawks weren't beatable, but the NFC Championship Game showed that this year's clearly are, and the Patriots' the-world's-out-to-get-us week is just what Belichick needed to get the better team in the right frame of mind.
Really? The Seahawks weren't beatable last year? Now they are beatable, because they shot themselves in the foot in the NFCCG with stupid turnovers and still managed to win? The Seahawks won, idiot. If they were beatable, they would have lost the NFCCG.
Assholes like him didn't even watch the game. They just looked at the box score and called it a day. -
Maybe there's just lots of talking because he IS wrong so often.Tequilla said:Lots of people like to talk about all the times Cowherd is wrong
-
I saw a stat somewhere that read the seahawks haven't lost by 10+ 60 something games running. I think the next closest team is at 18.Tequilla said:Only way the Patriots win by that amount is IF the offense can't do anything and commits a ton of turnovers
We already saw what happens when that occurs in the NFC title game ...
When was the last time #3 lost a game by more than 1 score?
The streak goes through Russell's entire career, so he's never lost by more than 3 fgs. If that doesn't scream "winner" I don't know what does.
But to the point of thread, highly unlikely they lose by a double digit margin. -
People forget that the Seahawks barely won Super Bowl 48 over the 49ers.PurpleBaze said:I was bored, so I decided to look at what ESPN's so-called experts are predicting.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2014/story/_/id/12244977/super-bowl-xlix-predictions-espn-staff-picks-big-game
Dan Graziano's "assessment" is FS.
Dan Graziano, ESPN New York Giants reporter
Patriots 26, Seahawks 17 -- Last year's Seahawks weren't beatable, but the NFC Championship Game showed that this year's clearly are, and the Patriots' the-world's-out-to-get-us week is just what Belichick needed to get the better team in the right frame of mind.
Really? The Seahawks weren't beatable last year? Now they are beatable, because they shot themselves in the foot in the NFCCG with stupid turnovers and still managed to win? The Seahawks won, idiot. If they were beatable, they would have lost the NFCCG.
Assholes like him didn't even watch the game. They just looked at the box score and called it a day. -
Week 2Tequilla said:Only way the Patriots win by that amount is IF the offense can't do anything and commits a ton of turnovers
We already saw what happens when that occurs in the NFC title game ...
When was the last time #3 lost a game by more than 1 score?
But yeah, no fucking way Seattle loses by 17.
-
Fatigue makes cowards of us all. They run Lynch 5 or 10 times in the first half just to soften things up. Defenses are all geared up and they do a pretty good job. You also spread the field and run the defense around. Then in the second half the tired defense doesn't want to tackle Lynch anymore and you smash him into them time after time. There's a reason the Hawks do so well in the 4th quarter. It's not an accident
-
crispedRaceBannon said:Fatigue makes cowherds of us all. They run Lynch 5 or 10 times in the first half just to soften things up. Defenses are all geared up and they do a pretty good job. You also spread the field and run the defense around. Then in the second half the tired defense doesn't want to tackle Lynch anymore and you smash him into them time after time. There's a reason the Hawks do so well in the 4th quarter. It's not an accident
