Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Prisco On Russell Wilson: Not That Good
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,372 
in NFL Talk
Comments
-
Prisco is a super secret 9er troll trying to make 12s look bad.
-
He knows how to get hits on his website.
-
He's good, not great. Lucky to have Lynch, Carroll, the defense, etc. I'll take Brady or Rogers any day.
Hate me now 12s. I insulted your sun god. -
I'm glad he sucked for 57 minutes against Green Bay. Got that out of his system. Champions come back with a vengeance.
-
I had almost forgotten how shitty he played for those 57 minutes.RaceBannon said:I'm glad he sucked for 57 minutes against Green Bay. Got that out of his system. Champions come back with a vengeance.
-
Biggest story line that nobody is talking about in this game.RaceBannon said:I'm glad he sucked for 57 minutes against Green Bay. Got that out of his system. Champions come back with a vengeance.
The other story line that nobody talks about is just HOW difficult it is to stop the running game of BOTH Lynch and Wilson because it's an inside/outside game. Plug the box to stop Lynch and the outside runs for Wilson become more open. Play wider to keep Wilson in the box and the lanes for Lynch to run become wider.
I think that there's a really good chance that you might find a flea flicker in the game for the Hawks as the Patriots are going to load up to stop the run. -
It's amazing how everyone's opinion of this game is completely based on ONLY the last two playoff games. I have never seen Wilson play as poorly as he did against Green Bay and will most likely never see him play that poorly again. We'll probably have no turnovers in the Superbowl. The Colts are terrible, aside from Vontae Davis they have literally no one good on defense. The Ravens handled New England and had 14 point leads two times before Flacco joked it away. No one is talking about that.
-
Russell Wilson does it without a very good OL and average WR's. Prisco is also FS for focusing soley on passing stats when he ran for 849 yards this year. Since Russell Wilson has thrown 17 TD's to 13 picks when losing it means he's not that good? That's some really fucking stupid analysis.
Russell Wilson is the best running QB in the NFL right now and possibly the best dual threat QB of all time. It all comes back to his height and where he was drafted. Some dumbfucks can't get over the fact that a 5'10" guy is a great QB.
If MIchael Vick produced like Russell Wilson, pundits would be calling him one of the greatest QB's of all time. Since it's Russell Wilson some don't want to admit that he's great. -
I think Browner is going to have a rough day. Nobody knows him better than the Hawks, and while he will win battles due to his strength, he's fucked if he whiffs on a jam. I'd try to get Baldwin on him as much as possible, because I think his quickness will give BB trouble. I like Tequilla's flea flicker suggestion, and I think that would be a great way to use Browner's aggressiveness against him.
-
Wilson will hear this shit throughout his entire career. But if he ends his career with 4-5 rings you think people will remember him for how "shitty" he was?
-
They'll probably mention how he relied on the greatest defense in NFL history for his wins. I honestly think he needs to win more than 4 rings for people to accept his greatness.CuntWaffle said:Wilson will hear this shit throughout his entire career. But if he ends his career with 4-5 rings you think people will remember him for how "shitty" he was?
-
I think Wilson will be remembered like Bradshaw. He'll have his defense and running game counted against him, which is FS. The Hawks' OL is fucking garbage, and he makes plays anyway. If Wilson and Lynch played behind the 2005 Hawks line, they'd skullfuck the world. If Russell wasn't a magician and Marshawn wasn't the equivalent of Tecmo Bowl Bo Jackson, we'd talk way more about how shitty their OL is.Doogles said:
They'll probably mention how he relied on the greatest defense in NFL history for his wins. I honestly think he needs to win more than 4 rings for people to accept his greatness.CuntWaffle said:Wilson will hear this shit throughout his entire career. But if he ends his career with 4-5 rings you think people will remember him for how "shitty" he was?
-
And why do people keep saying "wilson will never be a fantasy football star yet he will blah blah blah" he was one of the best fantasy players in the league
And whoa I forgot I had brady and wilson on my team -
I love the people that discredit Bradshaw as a QB and say he won because of his defense ... that was true early in his career ... but not so much later in his career. Moreover, if you take his 2nd to 4th Super Bowls, Bradshaw's stats were pretty damn good:
Super Bowl IX: 9 of 14 for 96; 5 carries for 33 yards;
Fran Tarkenton: 11 pf 26 for 103, 3 INTs
Super Bowl X: 9 of 19 for 209 and 2 TDs; 4 carries for 16 yards;
Roger Staubach: 15 of 24 for 203, 2 TDs, 3 INTs, 5 carries for 22
Super Bowl XIII: 17 of 30 for 318, 4 TDs, 1 INT (MVP)
Roger Staubach: 17 of 30 for 228, 3 TDs, 1 INT, 4 carries for 37
Super Bowl XIV: 14 of 21 for 309, 2 TDs, 3 INTs (MVP)
Vince Ferragamo: 15 of 22 for 212, 1 INT -
"[Russell Wilson] is not good in the pocket — in fact he’s downright awful in the pocket."
Any shred of credibility is gone after that statement.
Anyone who GAF what this tool think is Dawgman subscriber FS. -
"What pocket?"
-Seattle OL -
Such truth J
-
He's black, so yesCuntWaffle said:Wilson will hear this shit throughout his entire career. But if he ends his career with 4-5 rings you think people will remember him for how "shitty" he was?
-
-
Fuck that guy. He just wants Russell to fail so he can be right. Wilson's stats are identical to Brady's at this point in their careers, with the exception of Wilson's vastly superior rushing numbers. Prisco is gonna go down with his fucktarded ship on this one. I can't wait to see what that prick has to say if Russell beats his boy Brady on Sunday.dhdawg said: -
I hope Prisco is trolling in hopes of becoming the next Skip Bayless. Russell Wilson's first three years are better than just about every QB to play the game.
-
As I said after the Packers game, at his worst Russell Wilson is Time Tebow.dhdawg said:
At his best, he does shit no one has ever been able to do for any length of tim.
Fuck Prisco.
-
How is it Wilson's fault that he fits the Hawks system perfect. It's just click bait by Prisco, but there are lots of people out there that actually agree with Prisco, and they are really stupid.
As others have said, the start to Wilson's career (Just numbers themselves, not talking about wins or super bowls) is better than just about EVERYONE to EVER play the QB position. And he is doing that with shit for receivers and a crap OL.
Imagine if this Seahawk team had a big time WR and added a talented LG and RT onto the line.
But even without that luxury Wilson is re-writing the record books. -
Thanks for reading
-
Prisco knows that agitating the 12's will result in those idiots raging and going over to his website to post comments. More clicks for him.
-
What I find funny is that you see this with a lot of players on the Seahawks. Sherman only covers half the field put him on another team or man to man. Kam Chancellor is lucky he has Earl Thomas covering the spots he can't because he is slow. Russell is only good because he has a great RB and Defense.
It's like the only two good players on the team are Earl Thomas and Marshawn Lynch. Well they have both been on the team for awhile even when they sucked. So something had to happen to make them Super Bowl caliber. Are you telling me the Seahawks possibly go back to back with Tavaris Jackson? Kill yourself. -
-
This. Prisco is a decent analyst, but he's being a troll for his own purposes. Hubbuch needs to do the world a favor and chug bleach.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Prisco > Hubbuch though:
-
Of the Coney Island Hubbuchs?
-
When was the last time Wilson lost a game by more than 1 score?
Anybody that needs to understand why he is a great QB needs to start there
