The Re-Rank is Coming!
Comments
-
Kearse was funny for me, I was going to give him a 1, but then I remembered he scored a TD on a fumble return in the Utah game on the road and I gave him a 2.RoadDawg55 said:
Agree on Kohler. I disagree about Kearse. He did nothing save for a couple plays his freshman year.Tequilla said:The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.
I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes. -
I don't remember what I ended up with Kearse...think I went 1 because his only contribution was on special teams.
-
93% 5 star on Bishop, highest % agreement unless I missed one.
-
I guess I value special team contributions more than most ... but I don't necessarily have a problem with a guy that is a depth LB/DB that is able to make solid plays on special teams ... particularly if you noticed that player on special teams.
-
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who had no idea who most of these guys were. I think I started giving ones just because I felt bad giving so many zeros.
-
Easiest way to get rid of outlier votes is to get rid of each player's highest and lowest vote.
-
That is what we will be doing.CheersWestDawg said:Easiest way to get rid of outlier votes is to get rid of each player's highest and lowest vote.
-
Pretty cool. I voted with the majority on all but a handful if I remember correctly. A couple of notable exceptions are on Andrew Hudson, who I gave 4*, and ASJ, who I gave 5*. I went back and forth a bit on both of them and wouldn't really argue too vehemently in favor of my vote.
-
Couldn't do ASJ at 5...and Hudson might have been a 4 for me. Will wait to see the publishing.
-
To whomever didn't vote Shaq, Danny or Hau'oli a 5, what the FRONK do you want? Being an All-American isn't good enough? For RHUBARB'S sake? If your criteria for 5 is Steve Emtman, then like 5 people in the history of the LAKE LUCERNE Washington Huskies were 5s.
I understand grading hard on players who suck (#jessecalliercomestomind), but who gives Des Trufant a 3? The guy was a four year starter and first round pick!
DIAF and get a curable disease, but die from it!
