The Re-Rank is Coming!
Comments
-
Again, probably the test submission... stupid Google.
-
Yes, we had to a do a test submission early on to see if it worked, sadly, I went through and just assigned numbers, so some of this is messed up. We have all the correct numbers, we just have to put them in our own excel spreadsheet which we will do this weekend.
-
Who is Sean Parker? If that was my only bad rank I'll be shocked. At least I had heard of him!MrsPetersen said:Oops, the 1 for Sean Parker was a test submission.... but @claycha gave him a 2.
-
@Dennis_DeYoung is going to tear that test submission a new a-hole
-
I blame @CokeGreaterThanPepsibrchco12 said:@Dennis_DeYoung is going to tear that test submission a new a-hole
-
Rapeculturedawg said:
Who the fuck gave Sean Parker a 1* or a 2*? I'm calling you out
RoadDawg55 said:Five retards gave Marcus Peters a 3.
Rapeculturedawg said:Someone voted Erich Wilson a 5*
WHO THE FUCK IS COMPROMISING OUR VOTING SYSTEM??????????doogsinparadise said:Who voted Bishop and Hauoli a 1? Assuming Derrick Brown as a 4 was a tongue in cheek vote.
YOU GUYS RUINED EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!11!!1 -
The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.
I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes. -
It's a subjective voting system based on the opinions of basement-dwelling, sweatpants-wearing, sock fuckers. What did you all expect?
-
It's subjective, but our thought is to pull the highest rating and the lowest rating (not counting idiot test submission) and then average it out. I think for the most part it will be pretty on the spot.
-
Agree on Kohler. I disagree about Kearse. He did nothing save for a couple plays his freshman year.Tequilla said:The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.
I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes. -
Kearse was funny for me, I was going to give him a 1, but then I remembered he scored a TD on a fumble return in the Utah game on the road and I gave him a 2.RoadDawg55 said:
Agree on Kohler. I disagree about Kearse. He did nothing save for a couple plays his freshman year.Tequilla said:The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.
I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes. -
I don't remember what I ended up with Kearse...think I went 1 because his only contribution was on special teams.
-
93% 5 star on Bishop, highest % agreement unless I missed one.
-
I guess I value special team contributions more than most ... but I don't necessarily have a problem with a guy that is a depth LB/DB that is able to make solid plays on special teams ... particularly if you noticed that player on special teams.
-
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who had no idea who most of these guys were. I think I started giving ones just because I felt bad giving so many zeros.
-
Easiest way to get rid of outlier votes is to get rid of each player's highest and lowest vote.
-
That is what we will be doing.CheersWestDawg said:Easiest way to get rid of outlier votes is to get rid of each player's highest and lowest vote.
-
Pretty cool. I voted with the majority on all but a handful if I remember correctly. A couple of notable exceptions are on Andrew Hudson, who I gave 4*, and ASJ, who I gave 5*. I went back and forth a bit on both of them and wouldn't really argue too vehemently in favor of my vote.
-
Couldn't do ASJ at 5...and Hudson might have been a 4 for me. Will wait to see the publishing.
-
To whomever didn't vote Shaq, Danny or Hau'oli a 5, what the FRONK do you want? Being an All-American isn't good enough? For RHUBARB'S sake? If your criteria for 5 is Steve Emtman, then like 5 people in the history of the LAKE LUCERNE Washington Huskies were 5s.
I understand grading hard on players who suck (#jessecalliercomestomind), but who gives Des Trufant a 3? The guy was a four year starter and first round pick!
DIAF and get a curable disease, but die from it! -
After looking at the preliminary results...
-They give a good feel as to how feast and famine Sark's recruiting was.
-For the most recent classes, only the transfers/dropouts have really left the program so far. This makes things look worse than they actually are, since dropouts/transfers are primarily the only players we evaluated. -
That is true when comparing between classes that haven't finished yet, but it has some information for comparing within a class.Muttzen said:After looking at the preliminary results...
-They give a good feel as to how feast and famine Sark's recruiting was.
-For the most recent classes, only the transfers/dropouts have really left the program so far. This makes things look worse than they actually are, since dropouts/transfers are primarily the only players we evaluated.
