The Re-Rank is Coming!
Comments
-
Again, probably the test submission... stupid Google.
-
Yes, we had to a do a test submission early on to see if it worked, sadly, I went through and just assigned numbers, so some of this is messed up. We have all the correct numbers, we just have to put them in our own excel spreadsheet which we will do this weekend.
-
Who is Sean Parker? If that was my only bad rank I'll be shocked. At least I had heard of him!MrsPetersen said:Oops, the 1 for Sean Parker was a test submission.... but @claycha gave him a 2.
-
@Dennis_DeYoung is going to tear that test submission a new a-hole
-
I blame @CokeGreaterThanPepsibrchco12 said:@Dennis_DeYoung is going to tear that test submission a new a-hole
-
Rapeculturedawg said:
Who the fuck gave Sean Parker a 1* or a 2*? I'm calling you out
RoadDawg55 said:Five retards gave Marcus Peters a 3.
Rapeculturedawg said:Someone voted Erich Wilson a 5*
WHO THE FUCK IS COMPROMISING OUR VOTING SYSTEM??????????doogsinparadise said:Who voted Bishop and Hauoli a 1? Assuming Derrick Brown as a 4 was a tongue in cheek vote.
YOU GUYS RUINED EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!11!!1 -
The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.
I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes. -
It's a subjective voting system based on the opinions of basement-dwelling, sweatpants-wearing, sock fuckers. What did you all expect?
-
It's subjective, but our thought is to pull the highest rating and the lowest rating (not counting idiot test submission) and then average it out. I think for the most part it will be pretty on the spot.
-
Agree on Kohler. I disagree about Kearse. He did nothing save for a couple plays his freshman year.Tequilla said:The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.
I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes.
