ESPN: USC should follow Ohio State's blueprint on how to return to top
Comments
-
Step one: hire a real
coach.Corch. -
"...the Trojans will have to be extremely talented, physical, disciplined, dedicated, and well coached."
Yeah, right...
The talent will be there, but not the other stuff. -
It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
Why shouldn't UW follow the blueprint?
-
Agree .. but hope you're wrong about PatHadenFS's tolerance for losses.RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
St. Pat might not be there either when Sark falls on his face.Southerndawg said:
Agree .. but hope you're wrong about PatHadenFS's tolerance for losses.RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
I think Sark survives anything above 7-5, but if he wins less than 9 I think he'll be under a lot of pressure to make some changes (give up playcalling, fire Wilcox) and win big in 2016.
Then in 2016 he'll have a new QB and a schedule that includes: Alabama, ND, Oregon, @UW, @UCLA, @Stanford. Profiles in Courage: he'll be fired at some point before the bowl game in 2016.
From what I follow Sark is going to crush recruiting this year, he probably will finish with a class rated above Alabama on signing day. That class will either save his fat ass with 8/9 win mediocrity or, more likely, leave a fully stacked roster for a real coach -
section8 said:
St. Pat might not be there either when Sark falls on hisSoutherndawg said:
Agree .. but hope you're wrong about PatHadenFS's tolerance for losses.RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games.facegunt. -
LOL at the comments. "Sark is not cocky" "..has more knowledge of the game"
w,jw
Rodney Strong
USC with more depth next season will be a team that will be in the CFP. The difference from Kiffen to Sark is that Sark is not Cocky and been a head coach longer than kiffen has been and have more knowledge of the game than Kiffen. USC has had the issues of having less numbers than most of the college football FBS teams, ontop of that USC has not had a big physical practice since the 2011 season, and those that know and play football know that you cannot be successful when you are not practice the pace of the game. But this season USC will be able to and will be able to add more depth and star power. It will be good on good instead of good on walk-on or 3rd String -
Depth is the new Owen12. It makes me want to fucking puke.
-
Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah they should follow this shit:
get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their teamuse their RBs and OL to run over Oregon. -
We need USC back to win the conference some championships. UW coming back can help, too. I don't see any other programs that have what it takes to compete on the national stage.oregonblitzkrieg said:Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die.
#BacThePac -
Edited for the part that deserved an upvoteoregonblitzkrieg said:Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team.And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die. -
Quooks gonna quook. Blaming a 3rd string QB for having a +4 turnover ratio and losing by 22 lol.oregonblitzkrieg said:Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die.
-
fixedoregonblitzkrieg said:If you are a fan of any PAC 12 team and you want any other Pac 12 to return to the top, you need to die.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck
USCOregon. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you wantUSCOregon to return to the top, you need to die. -
Agreed.BallSacked said:I think Sark survives anything above 7-5, but if he wins less than 9 I think he'll be under a lot of pressure to make some changes (give up playcalling, fire Wilcox) and win big in 2016.
Then in 2016 he'll have a new QB and a schedule that includes: Alabama, ND, Oregon, @UW, @UCLA, @Stanford. Profiles in Courage: he'll be fired at some point before the bowl game in 2016.
From what I follow Sark is going to crush recruiting this year, he probably will finish with a class rated above Alabama on signing day. That class will either save his fat ass with 8/9 win mediocrity or, more likely, leave a fully stacked roster for a real coach
8-9 wins and he'll be in the hot seat in year 3. With that schedule and his coaching ability, its highly unlikely they get to 10 win. Wouldn't it be great if Sark just goes 9-4, 9-4, 9-4 and never matches Orgeron. -
Ohio st giving USC advice?
Section8, maybe if USC just had Timu at middle backer they'd be on top.section8 said:LOL at the comments. "Sark is not cocky" "..has more knowledge of the game"
w,jw
Rodney Strong
USC with more depth next season will be a team that will be in the CFP. The difference from Kiffen to Sark is that Sark is not Cocky and been a head coach longer than kiffen has been and have more knowledge of the game than Kiffen. USC has had the issues of having less numbers than most of the college football FBS teams, ontop of that USC has not had a big physical practice since the 2011 season, and those that know and play football know that you cannot be successful when you are not practice the pace of the game. But this season USC will be able to and will be able to add more depth and star power. It will be good on good instead of good on walk-on or 3rd String -
USC fans aren't very happy with Wilcox. Wonder if Sark will hire a new DC for 2016 and use that as an excuse for getting destroyed by everyone.
-
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year.RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year.RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
That's the ideal scenario, just good enough to not get fired.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Agreed.BallSacked said:I think Sark survives anything above 7-5, but if he wins less than 9 I think he'll be under a lot of pressure to make some changes (give up playcalling, fire Wilcox) and win big in 2016.
Then in 2016 he'll have a new QB and a schedule that includes: Alabama, ND, Oregon, @UW, @UCLA, @Stanford. Profiles in Courage: he'll be fired at some point before the bowl game in 2016.
From what I follow Sark is going to crush recruiting this year, he probably will finish with a class rated above Alabama on signing day. That class will either save his fat ass with 8/9 win mediocrity or, more likely, leave a fully stacked roster for a real coach
8-9 wins and he'll be in the hot seat in year 3. With that schedule and his coaching ability, its highly unlikely they get to 10 win. Wouldn't it be great if Sark just goes 9-4, 9-4, 9-4 and never matches Orgeron.
We all love seeing Sark fail, it's fucking awesome, but it's actually in the best interest of everyones teams, especially my own, if he stays employed by SC for a long time. -
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
" Wouldn't it be great if Sark just goes 9-4, 9-4, 9-4 and never matches Orgeron. "
This.
USC recruiting/intangibles mean two wins per year versus UW's intangibles.
Its the script.
-
How about someone besides me come up with original shit? Fuck you guys are more like sheep that Kim's crew of puckersuckers. Are you dorks gonna sell the couch everytiime someone goes pro? Thank the fuck underclassmen declaration ended today.CuntWaffle said:
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
Fucking Groundhog Day around here.dnc said:
How about someone besides me come up with original shit? Fuck you guys are more like sheep that Kim's crew of puckersuckers. Are you dorks gonna sell the couch everytiime someone goes pro? Thank the fuck underclassmen declaration ended today.CuntWaffle said:
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games. -
Ive said this before to you. Hetro men dont say say the word fuck in that context. Its super creepy Thomas. I know you are gay and im not trying to be funny. Only gay men talk like that. Its fucking weird and nobody on this forum has ever said what you just did for the second time. Steer clear of my posts dude, ick!dnc said:
How about someone besides me come up with original shit? Fuck you guys are more like sheep that Kim's crew of puckersuckers. Are you dorks gonna sell the couch everytiime someone goes pro? Thank the fuck underclassmen declaration ended today.CuntWaffle said:
Good post Race but Sark stays 3 years minimum. He'll pull a Pelini and win just enough games to stay on payroll for 3, maybe 4. I think he wins the South so he'll at least get 3. South too weak, USC too friggin good next year. Nobody in the South can match up. Hate to say it but Sark might win conference. Pac12 will suck hind-teat next year, right along with the SEC (sans tennessee and Arkansas upon early look, 1/15/'15 for you fags who bank my shit so you can "attempt" to pounce on pup a year later).)RaceBannon said:It is so blindingly obvious that USC needs the right coach. The players are always there. Carroll came in and went 6-6 then went 48-4. The players were there for him and he just kept adding to them.
I think Sark gets fired after next year if he loses more than 2 games.
