Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Who wins? Indy or Pats?
jecornel
Member Posts: 9,737
and why
Comments
-
No clue. I thought Denver would plunger Indy. I figured the Colts' lack of a run game would allow Miller and Ware to live in the Indy backfield, but I was clearly mistaken. I think that game was more about Denver shitting the bed than the Colts playing great. Then again, I'm not overly impressed with New England either. I wouldn't be surprised to see Indy win if Luck can play a clean game.
-
I agree, it seems like a hard game to predict. Indy's secondary was like glue. It was almost as if they knew exactly what was coming.
Though, the Bengals seemed to have the Broncos figured out as well.
Maybe it was obvious the routes Peyton was only able to throw. His body and arm failed him.
Gronk to me is the difference maker, but Herron can run but does fumble. If Indy can run the ball with success and Luck doesn't have his boneheaded turnovers Indy wins.
Should be great weekend of ball.
-
Pats, Denver lost that game more than the Colts won it.
-
Patriots...
-
Pats, rather easily
-
Pats. I didn't believe in the Colts before the Denver game. Still don't.
-
Denver would have won that game if John Fox wasn't so FS. Belichick won't make the same mistake of going away from the run, and Brady doesn't have the same track record of crapping the bed.
-
Pats
Noodlearm is done in Denver.
At this point, New England is a far better team than Denver with a far better QB. Plus, New England has already wiped the floor with Indy earlier this year in a game that wasn't as close as the score indicated. -
GRONK!
