Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jake the Savior, Part II

PurpleBaze
PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,325 Founders Club
That's all we have to look forward to. We have to cross our fingers that he's actually an excellent QB and can lead this team for 2-3 years.

FYFMFE
«1

Comments

  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311

    CAN'T WAIT to hate him in 2016.

    More like 2017.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,728 Founders Club
    edited January 2015

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    FUCK YOU ROAD!!!!
























    road's right.
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,325 Founders Club

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    Youth an rebuilding for 15 years... awesome!
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    LaZoris said:

    my god.... how bad are lindquist and williams if they cant beat out cylee

    Exactly.

    If not, we are overpaying Peterman.

    I hope it's the former.
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    H_D said:

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
    Was he a true freshman?
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098

    H_D said:

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
    Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.

    The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
    I didn't say "Savior", I just want "serviceable".
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    H_D said:

    H_D said:

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
    Was he a true freshman?
    I don't know. Stop trying to use facts to ruin my argument.
    You gave me a hope for a minute there.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    edited January 2015
    H_D said:

    H_D said:

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
    Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.

    The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
    I didn't say "Savior", I just want "serviceable".
    Me too, but serviceable won't get us contending when you look at the rest of the roster.
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098

    H_D said:

    H_D said:

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
    Was he a true freshman?
    I don't know. Stop trying to use facts to ruin my argument.
    You gave me a hope for a minute there.
    Besides, coming in early and participating in spring practice is just as good as redshirting.

    #DoogLogic
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098

    H_D said:

    H_D said:

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    81% chance you are right, but once in a blue moon, it does happen where a freshman QB comes in and has success.
    image
    Counting on a saviour at QB is ridiculous. Getting average QB play compared to the rest of the conference would be a success. That is especially true if it is Browning or KJCS.

    The young OL and DL will need a season to gel. I'm hopeful we don't completely suck next year. 5-4 or 6-3 would be a very good season. We all hate the youth excuse, but it will be a young team. Some youth is fine, but not for both lines.
    I didn't say "Savior", I just want "serviceable".
    Me too, but serviceable won't get us contending when you look at the rest of the roster.
    It will in all hypothetical January upcoming season debates.

    But yeah, seriously, you're right.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    After this game, I might give up my left nut for 6-3 in conference.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    I'll wager $20 Sven bucks that we'll get better after losing 4 of these OL.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,728 Founders Club
    edited January 2015
    Road is right. Reading the Thursday Speeches book recently has put a lot of shit in perspective. We are eager as shit to see a winner at U-dub. Our hated (used to be) rival down south is playing for all the marbles and will probably succeed. We just lost to OkL in a bowl game nobody gives a fuck about. It's frustrating as fuck.

    Couple that with the old joke 20XX is going to be special, and it's easy to mutiny. Next year IS a rebuilding year, by all measures, hall of fame coach or not. We are shit now, and lose legitimate talent in the trenches. If Browning is the future he'll be a true frosh, mistakes will be made.

    Pete gets 3, and he has some serious staff eval to do on the offensive side of the ball, but when next year looks similar or worse don't be surprised.

    Year 3 fellas.
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311

    After this game, I might give up my left nut for 6-3 in conference.

    Save that right nut for another 6-3 in conference for 2016, we'll need it.
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    Doogles said:

    Road is right. Reading the Thursday Speeches book recently has put a lot of shit in perspective. We are eager as shit to see a winner at U-dub. Our hated (used to be) rival down south is playing for all the marbles and will probably succeed. We just lost to OkL in a bowl game nobody gives a fuck about. It's frustrating as fuck.

    Couple that with the old joke 20XX is going to be special, and it's easy to mutiny. Next year IS a rebuilding year, by all measures, hall of fame coach or not. We are shit now, and lose legitimate talent in the trenches. If Browning is the future he'll be a true frosh, mistakes will be made. Pete gets 3, and he has some serious staff eval to do on the offensive side of the ball, but when next year looks similar or worse don't be surprised.

    Year 3 fellas.

    $2.99 shipped for your copy of the Thursday Speeches book, thanks in advance.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,728 Founders Club

    Doogles said:

    Road is right. Reading the Thursday Speeches book recently has put a lot of shit in perspective. We are eager as shit to see a winner at U-dub. Our hated (used to be) rival down south is playing for all the marbles and will probably succeed. We just lost to OkL in a bowl game nobody gives a fuck about. It's frustrating as fuck.

    Couple that with the old joke 20XX is going to be special, and it's easy to mutiny. Next year IS a rebuilding year, by all measures, hall of fame coach or not. We are shit now, and lose legitimate talent in the trenches. If Browning is the future he'll be a true frosh, mistakes will be made. Pete gets 3, and he has some serious staff eval to do on the offensive side of the ball, but when next year looks similar or worse don't be surprised.

    Year 3 fellas.

    $2.99 shipped for your copy of the Thursday Speeches book, thanks in advance.
    It was a gift. And i'm keeping it.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143

    Gladstone said:

    Jake or hyphen start week 1. Or the season is over.

    The season is already over. You don't lost your best players on defense and 4 OL and get drastically better. It's a rebuilding year.
    I'll wager $20 Sven bucks that we'll get better after losing 4 of these OL.
    Because I want us to be better, we will be post of the night.
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    Doogles said:

    Doogles said:

    Road is right. Reading the Thursday Speeches book recently has put a lot of shit in perspective. We are eager as shit to see a winner at U-dub. Our hated (used to be) rival down south is playing for all the marbles and will probably succeed. We just lost to OkL in a bowl game nobody gives a fuck about. It's frustrating as fuck.

    Couple that with the old joke 20XX is going to be special, and it's easy to mutiny. Next year IS a rebuilding year, by all measures, hall of fame coach or not. We are shit now, and lose legitimate talent in the trenches. If Browning is the future he'll be a true frosh, mistakes will be made. Pete gets 3, and he has some serious staff eval to do on the offensive side of the ball, but when next year looks similar or worse don't be surprised.

    Year 3 fellas.

    $2.99 shipped for your copy of the Thursday Speeches book, thanks in advance.
    It was a gift. And i'm keeping it.
    image
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    @whatshouldicareabout - I hope you are right and the OL is improved. Maybe it can happen by the middle to end of the season. They will need time though. Another worry is that none of the young guys/back ups have shown much. Coleman Shelton was bad when he played this year. Tufunga is JAG at best. Brostek has been terrible when he played and expecting him to be anything more than serviceable is probably wishful thinking.

    Sark whiffed on a lot of guys on the OL and most of the ones he did get aren't any good. I like some of the guys currently redshirting and it wouldn't shock me if Adams or Roberts saw the field, but it's a hard postion for a freshman to excel at. Where do you think this line will compare to the rest of the Pac?

    My hope is that it can be serviceable and the young guys improve as the season goes on. It's not a good situation and we might even need more than a year to get the OL right.


    At least on the DL, there are some young pups such as Mathis and Qualls who have shown they can play. Dissley was competing with Mathis and looked pretty good in limited time. Choate said Vita Vea was more talented than Shelton. Who knows if he will ever be as good, but I bet he will at worst be decent.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    After this game, I might give up my left nut for 6-3 in conference.

    Shut the program down right now.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991

    @whatshouldicareabout - I hope you are right and the OL is improved. Maybe it can happen by the middle to end of the season. They will need time though. Another worry is that none of the young guys/back ups have shown much. Coleman Shelton was bad when he played this year. Tufunga is JAG at best. Brostek has been terrible when he played and expecting him to be anything more than serviceable is probably wishful thinking.

    Sark whiffed on a lot of guys on the OL and most of the ones he did get aren't any good. I like some of the guys currently redshirting and it wouldn't shock me if Adams or Roberts saw the field, but it's a hard postion for a freshman to excel at. Where do you think this line will compare to the rest of the Pac?

    My hope is that it can be serviceable and the young guys improve as the season goes on. It's not a good situation and we might even need more than a year to get the OL right.


    At least on the DL, there are some young pups such as Mathis and Qualls who have shown they can play. Dissley was competing with Mathis and looked pretty good in limited time. Choate said Vita Vea was more talented than Shelton. Who knows if he will ever be as good, but I bet he will at worst be decent.

    The OL this year was experienced in a sense they had played in a lot of games but the OL was not very talented. In terms of experience, the 4 SR OL had played together for years, so you figured they'd continue right where they left off in 2013. However, the 4 SR OL had 4 years experience with zone blocking, meaning they were taught zone blocking for 4 years and played zone blocking for 4 years. When there was the coaching change, we shifted to a man blocking scheme, so in a sense, those 4 years of experience are somewhat misleading since they were now learning and trying to perfect a new blocking scheme. Yes, they have game experience, but it's not the same as if they had Petersen for 4 years and had practiced man blocking for 4 years.

    Of course, experience is integral to a successful OL, but there needs to be talent, too, and this OL lacked talent. For example, how many Pac-12 teams would have Atoe as a starter on their OL? How many teams would have Coleman Shelton as their first replacement for a RT that was injured for most of the year? How many players deep was our OL? Sark neglected OL recruiting, so it won't be for another year or so before we see a significant climb in talent.

    However, the reason why I have hope that the OL will be better than last year is due to a number of reasons. The first and foremost is that we'll have another year of Strausser and another year of Socha and another year of practicing man blocking. The OL next year will have had twice as much time as the current OL. I don't know what kind of line you work in, but think about where you were at the 1 year mark versus the 2 year mark. Or you can think of your podcasts, where you were at point A and at A x2. The second is that the offense should adjust next year. Petersen won't accept how the offense performed this year and he'll make it his mission this offseason to improve it. If he's the coach we think he is, the offense is his top priority. I don't think he'll pull the trigger on Smith after one season (though I wouldn't mind it), but they'll change their philosophy to reflect the personnel which will help mask the deficiencies of the OL next year. Whether we imitate Sark and go back to Bubble-screen City or what remains to be seen. However, I do know that Petersen will identify the weaknesses in from this season.

    As for the DL, we will be taking a step back from losing Shelton and Kikaha, but I think we'll see a step up in place of Hudson and Hudson. If it were up to me, we'd be seeing Vea at NT, Qualls at DT, Dissly at DE and Mathis at Buck.
  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    Chance that Browning starts. Get the boy some anabolics and meet up w/ Ivan in the weight room
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    This thread went from use of HeretoBeatmyChest's testicles to Tequilla long poasts.