Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
For the SEC West haters, a simple challenge
Comments
-
ACC Coastal. Georgia Tech thunder fucks the team that many were actually thinking would play for the title.
Bam! -
This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit. -
During out of conference and bowl games, the SEC's best win is either Georgia over Louisville in the bowl game or LSU over Wisconsin (same one who lost 59-0 two weeks ago). Maybe Missouri over Minnesota can be mentioned too. The SEC beat nobody.
Every single conference has better out of conference and/or Bowl wins.
Pac 12- Michigan State, Florida State
Big 10- Alabama, Baylor
Big 12- Ole Miss
ACC- Georgia, Ohio State
I'm missing many more and not putting mediocre teams like Notre Dame on there. -
Georgia Tech lost to Dukecreepycoug said:ACC Coastal. Georgia Tech thunder fucks the team that many were actually thinking would play for the title.
Bam!
Duke lost to ASU.
Everybody else in that division was 7-6 or worse.
Solid answer. -
Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.Doogles said:
This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football? -
Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.Doogles said:
This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average. -
Oh, Mr. Em is back with his magic button.
You done cleaning yourself up down there Sally? -
fuck, don't explain it. every fucking body knows that teams look like shit at some point in the season. and conference play is weird and unpredictable. that's where 80% of the upsets happen, except those who follow any particular conference are never half as surprised as the outsiders are.RoadDawg55 said:
Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.Doogles said:
This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
it's just the fucking way it is. that's how a 3-8 USC team played Washington close for 50 minutes in 1991. just the nature of conference play. it's how a shit BC team almost beat the 2001 Miami Hurricanes, who needed a true fucking miracle to pull that game out of their asses.
Oregon may not be an all-time great team, but the Pac 12 is no more "Down" this year than it was in 1991 or 1984 or 2000. Give me a fucking break. -
Arizona won their division. Stanford lost three games to the Pac-12 South, so they're worse than Arizona too.RoadDawg55 said:
Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.Doogles said:
This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
The Pac-12 fucking sucks too. Fortunately its one good team is better than the ACC's best. We'll find out if it's better than the B1G's best soon. -
You literally have no idea what you're talking about.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Arizona won their division. Stanford lost three games to the Pac-12 South, so they're worse than Arizona too.RoadDawg55 said:
Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.Doogles said:
This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
The Pac-12 fucking sucks too. Fortunately its one good team is better than the ACC's best. We'll find out if it's better than the B1G's best soon.
