Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For the SEC West haters, a simple challenge

Tell me which division/conference is better.

It's a simple question, ANSWER IT.
«1

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Revenge of the nerds around here.
    So glad I don't give a shit about this.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,676 Standard Supporter
    No fair, nobody knows or cares what the ACC divisions are
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    That's what I thought.

  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Wow @TierbsHsotBoobs‌ is a total pussy.

    Your teams got destroyed in bowl season, that means they are dreckfest. Don't go changing the rules Obama.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,476 Founders Club

    It's all subjective. How can you say the SEC West is best when the top 5 teams lost? Answer that. Because Sagarian says so?

    Alabama- lost
    #7 MSU- Plungered. The score looks a lot closer than it was.
    #9 Ole Miss- Plungered
    Auburn- Lost to Big 10 supposed dreck coming off 59-0 loss
    LSU- Lost to Notre Dame who was recently plungered by both ASU and USC.

    There is irony in you saying doogs hate facts.

    Boobs gonna boob.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    It's all subjective. How can you say the SEC West is best when the top 5 teams lost? Answer that. Because Sagarian says so?

    Alabama- lost
    #7 MSU- Plungered. The score looks a lot closer than it was.
    #9 Ole Miss- Plungered
    Auburn- Lost to Big 10 supposed dreck coming off 59-0 loss
    LSU- Lost to Notre Dame who was recently plungered by both ASU and USC.

    There is irony in you saying doogs hate facts.

    5 games don't make a season.

    answer the fucking question.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Wow @TierbsHsotBoobs‌ is a total pussy.

    Your teams got destroyed in bowl season, that means they are dreckfest. Don't go changing the rules Obama.

    I totally agree they are a dreckfest. I said so before the Sugar Bowl even kicked off:



    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/16859/hello-there
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,730 Founders Club
    Sven needs to step away from the keyboard for a second. He clearly cares that the bored knows he was wrong.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,144

    It's all subjective. How can you say the SEC West is best when the top 5 teams lost? Answer that. Because Sagarian says so?

    Alabama- lost
    #7 MSU- Plungered. The score looks a lot closer than it was.
    #9 Ole Miss- Plungered
    Auburn- Lost to Big 10 supposed dreck coming off 59-0 loss
    LSU- Lost to Notre Dame who was recently plungered by both ASU and USC.

    There is irony in you saying doogs hate facts.

    5 games don't make a season.

    answer the fucking question.
    image
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,216

    It's all subjective. How can you say the SEC West is best when the top 5 teams lost? Answer that. Because Sagarian says so?

    Alabama- lost
    #7 MSU- Plungered. The score looks a lot closer than it was.
    #9 Ole Miss- Plungered
    Auburn- Lost to Big 10 supposed dreck coming off 59-0 loss
    LSU- Lost to Notre Dame who was recently plungered by both ASU and USC.

    There is irony in you saying doogs hate facts.

    5 games don't make a season.

    answer the fucking question.
    You're moving the goal poasts further than Auburndoog
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,730 Founders Club
    Add another conference game to the SEC schedule and then I might take their records seriously.

    Less opportunities for loss + inflated rankings = Booby J drool.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    It's all subjective. How can you say the SEC West is best when the top 5 teams lost? Answer that. Because Sagarian says so?

    Alabama- lost
    #7 MSU- Plungered. The score looks a lot closer than it was.
    #9 Ole Miss- Plungered
    Auburn- Lost to Big 10 supposed dreck coming off 59-0 loss
    LSU- Lost to Notre Dame who was recently plungered by both ASU and USC.

    There is irony in you saying doogs hate facts.

    5 games don't make a season.

    answer the fucking question.
    You're moving the goal poasts further than Auburndoog
    I'm still waiting for an answer. I've gotten Big Sky so far. If you had said Missouri Valley, you might have won the thread.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,676 Standard Supporter
    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    Fine. Tell me who the best conference was instead. I'll accept that as an alternative, because the XII might be better than the SEC.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,676 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2015
    Also, I thought we judged by championships? You three said that a ton. Overall strength is for Doog losers right?

    This conference can't even make a championship.

    Goalposts be moving
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Two indisputable truths we know in 2015:
    1. Boobs cares
    2. Boobs was wrong

    I was absolutely wrong. The SEC sucked this year. I've admitted that.

    Here's the thing though:

    Everyone else sucked too.

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    ACC Coastal. Georgia Tech thunder fucks the team that many were actually thinking would play for the title.

    Bam!
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,730 Founders Club

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.

    Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,144
    edited January 2015
    During out of conference and bowl games, the SEC's best win is either Georgia over Louisville in the bowl game or LSU over Wisconsin (same one who lost 59-0 two weeks ago). Maybe Missouri over Minnesota can be mentioned too. The SEC beat nobody.

    Every single conference has better out of conference and/or Bowl wins.

    Pac 12- Michigan State, Florida State
    Big 10- Alabama, Baylor
    Big 12- Ole Miss
    ACC- Georgia, Ohio State

    I'm missing many more and not putting mediocre teams like Notre Dame on there.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    ACC Coastal. Georgia Tech thunder fucks the team that many were actually thinking would play for the title.

    Bam!

    Georgia Tech lost to Duke
    Duke lost to ASU.
    Everybody else in that division was 7-6 or worse.

    Solid answer.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Doogles said:

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.

    Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
    Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.

    Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,144

    Doogles said:

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.

    Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
    Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.

    Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
    Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.

    Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    Oh, Mr. Em is back with his magic button.

    You done cleaning yourself up down there Sally?
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067

    Doogles said:

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.

    Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
    Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.

    Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
    Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.

    Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
    fuck, don't explain it. every fucking body knows that teams look like shit at some point in the season. and conference play is weird and unpredictable. that's where 80% of the upsets happen, except those who follow any particular conference are never half as surprised as the outsiders are.

    it's just the fucking way it is. that's how a 3-8 USC team played Washington close for 50 minutes in 1991. just the nature of conference play. it's how a shit BC team almost beat the 2001 Miami Hurricanes, who needed a true fucking miracle to pull that game out of their asses.

    Oregon may not be an all-time great team, but the Pac 12 is no more "Down" this year than it was in 1991 or 1984 or 2000. Give me a fucking break.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Doogles said:

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.

    Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
    Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.

    Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
    Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.

    Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
    Arizona won their division. Stanford lost three games to the Pac-12 South, so they're worse than Arizona too.

    The Pac-12 fucking sucks too. Fortunately its one good team is better than the ACC's best. We'll find out if it's better than the B1G's best soon.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067

    Doogles said:

    Conferences aren't usually judged by divisions. BSPN started doing it when the Miss. schools weren't their normal pile of garbage, and we also heard how Arkie was almost a great team who just needed to shake a 347 gayme SEC losing streak.

    This. The whole division thing started as a spin device to keep the rest of the college football world in awe of the SEC. Best conference top to bottom is probably the pac/acc depending on how the rest of bowl season shakes out.

    Also I think there is merit to understanding the concept of good teams getting better as the season progresses. Saying shit like "we have two teams playing for the title to Arizona and Vtech at home so it's all dreck" is the dumbest fucking concept. Serious 4th grade shit.
    Boise State is better than 11 of the 12 teams in the Pac-12.

    Why is it that losing to Arizona or Virginia Tech early is fine but losing a bowl game makes you Big Sky fodder? I thought the whole season mattered, isn't that the beauty of college football?
    Arizona to the Pac is Missouri to the SEC. Everyone knows Arizona sucks and had an extremely lucky season.

    Arizona got Oregon at a great time when Oregon was playing shitty and had some key injuries. They beat UTSA by 3. At home, needed a hail mary to beat Cal, and got really fucking lucky to beat UW. They had a couple nice wins, but they were really average.
    Arizona won their division. Stanford lost three games to the Pac-12 South, so they're worse than Arizona too.

    The Pac-12 fucking sucks too. Fortunately its one good team is better than the ACC's best. We'll find out if it's better than the B1G's best soon.
    You literally have no idea what you're talking about.